Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 845-851

Psychology Department, University of Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (Impact Factor: 5.08). 01/2006; 89(6):845-51. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.845
Source: PubMed


The authors propose that experiments that utilize mediational analyses as suggested by R. M. Baron and D. A. Kenny (1986) are overused and sometimes improperly held up as necessary for a good social psychological paper. The authors argue that when it is easy to manipulate and measure a proposed psychological process that a series of experiments that demonstrates the proposed causal chain is superior. They further argue that when it is easy to manipulate a proposed psychological process but difficult to measure it that designs that examine underlying process by utilizing moderation can be effective. It is only when measurement of a proposed psychological process is easy and manipulation of it is difficult that designs that rely on mediational analyses should be preferred, and even in these situations careful consideration should be given to the limiting factors of such designs.

Full-text preview

Available from:
  • Source
    • "Experiment 5 (a laboratory experiment involving UK university students) used an experimental-causal-chain design (Spencer et al., 2005) to manipulate self-continuity (the mediator) and assess its causal impact on eudaimonic wellbeing (the dependent variable). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Nostalgia, a sentimental longing for one’s past, is an emotion that arises from self-relevant and social memories. Nostalgia functions, in part, to foster self-continuity, that is, a sense of connection between one’s past and one’s present. This article examined, in six experiments, how nostalgia fosters self-continuity and the implications of that process for wellbeing. Nostalgia fosters self-continuity by augmenting social connectedness, that is, a sense of closeness, belongingness, and acceptance (Experiments 1-4). Nostalgia-induced self-continuity, in turn, confers eudaimonic wellbeing, operationalized as subjective vitality (i.e., a feeling of aliveness and energy; Experiments 5-6). The findings clarify and expand the benefits of nostalgia for both the self-system and psychological adjustment.
    Emotion 12/2015; · 3.88 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "To avoid this potential problem, in our Study 3, we measured, rather than manipulated, impression management. An extension would require two additional studies, one with getting along measured as a final outcome and another one where getting along is manipulated and its effect on interpersonal citizenship is assessed (MacKinnon, Coxe, & Baraldi, 2012; Spencer et al., 2005). Such a design is desirable in the future. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Extraversion has exhibited inconsistent relationships with employees’ interpersonal citizenship. Across three studies, we integrate literature on personality with impression management and socioanalytic theories to propose that employees’ impression management motives act as a contingency, strengthening the relationship between extraversion and interpersonal citizenship. First, in Studies 1 and 2, across two settings (field and university) and two designs (nonexperimental and experimental), we confirm that extraverted individuals engage in citizenship to a greater extent when they are also either predisposed (Study 1) or cued (Study 2) to manage others’ impressions. In Study 3, we extend these findings by using a conditional mediation process model to develop and test the hypothesis that an individual’s strategy to get along serves as an explanatory mechanism to the interactive effect of extraversion and impression management motives on interpersonal citizenship. Overall, our results suggest that the prediction of interpersonal citizenship can be improved when considering the conjoint influence of employees’ extraversion and impression management motives.
    Journal of Management 11/2015; 41(7). DOI:10.1177/0149206312471396 · 6.86 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Prior research (Hoorens et al., 2012) has not provided conclusive evidence for the full path. We set out to test unequivocally the three-step path via mediation (Hayes, 2013) and experimentation (Spencer, Zanna, & Fong, 2005). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Most people believe that they are in many respects superior to others. When they publicly express their superiority, they may do so in an explicitly or implicitly comparative manner (“I am better than others” vs. “I am good”). According to the hubris hypothesis, observers dislike explicit self-superiority claims, because these suggest a negative view of others and hence of the observers. The results of two experiments were consistent with the hubris hypothesis. Participants evaluated explicit self-superiority claimants more unfavorably than implicit self-superiority claimants (Experiments 1-2). They attributed less warmth, but not less competence, to explicit than implicit self-superiority claimants (Experiment 2), and this occurred to the extent that participants inferred a negative view of others (Experiments 1-2) and hence of them (Experiment 2).
    Self and Identity 11/2015; DOI:10.1080/15298868.2015.1095232 · 1.42 Impact Factor
Show more