Article

Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 845-851

Psychology Department, University of Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (Impact Factor: 5.08). 01/2006; 89(6):845-51. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.845
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The authors propose that experiments that utilize mediational analyses as suggested by R. M. Baron and D. A. Kenny (1986) are overused and sometimes improperly held up as necessary for a good social psychological paper. The authors argue that when it is easy to manipulate and measure a proposed psychological process that a series of experiments that demonstrates the proposed causal chain is superior. They further argue that when it is easy to manipulate a proposed psychological process but difficult to measure it that designs that examine underlying process by utilizing moderation can be effective. It is only when measurement of a proposed psychological process is easy and manipulation of it is difficult that designs that rely on mediational analyses should be preferred, and even in these situations careful consideration should be given to the limiting factors of such designs.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Steven J Spencer, Aug 17, 2015
1 Follower
 · 
160 Views
  • Source
    • "eded to examine the effects of behavioral disinhibition on private conformity as well as its effects on additional other - oriented reactions , including relevant cognitions , feelings , and other internalized responses . Although we believe that the effects of reminders of behavioral disinhibition are better studied using a chain of experiments ( Spencer et al . , 2005 ) , rather than by attempting to tap intervening variables that may disturb the effects of the reminders , we do want to note explicitly that future research is needed to examine relevant moderators and mediators of the processes suggested by our findings . For example , in earlier research we found that differences in social value orie"
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper argues that being in the Asch situation, where there is a felt need to conform to others' faulty behaviors, poses a social threat to people. Furthermore, participating in a psychology experiment in which you will have to interact with other participants might trigger sense-making processes. The paper proposes that these assumed threats or sense-making processes are likely to activate the behavioral inhibition system, making people respond in more inhibited ways than they normally would be inclined to do. As a result, people's tendency to affiliate behaviorally with persons who are similar to them can be inhibited. The implication is that lowering behavioral inhibition (by experimentally reminding people about having acted without behavioral inhibitions) should lead to more public conformity in the Asch situation and stronger behavioral affiliation with ingroup members than not being reminded about behavioral disinhibition. Findings of four experiments support this line of reasoning. These findings are discussed in terms of behavioral inhibition and behavioral affiliation. Alternative accounts of the data that focus on social belongingness threats and optimal distinctiveness are also considered.
    Frontiers in Psychology 06/2015; 6:837. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00837 · 2.80 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "If the effect of an independent on a dependent variable depends on the process, the latter should moderate the association between the independent and dependent variables. This experimental approach is the preferred way of establishing a causal chain when the process can be easily manipulated (Spencer et al., 2005). Because the motivation to act early can easily be manipulated , we chose to test our hypothesis using a moderationof-process design. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Model of Action Phases (Gollwitzer, 1990, 2012) distinguishes an implemental mindset evoked by planning goal-directed actions, from a deliberative mindset evoked by pondering pros/cons of adopting a particular goal. The present research demonstrates that mindsets affect time predictions. In Study 1 (N = 151), participants in an implemental mindset made shorter time predictions with respect to completing personal goals than participants in a deliberative mindset. In Study 2 (N = 78), we tested a mediating mechanism for the mindset effect by varying the motivation to return a report. The mindset effect was replicated in the low-but not in the high-motivation condition with participants in an implemental mindset returning the report earlier, and being as accurate in their predictions as participants in a deliberative mindset. Results indicate that an implemental (vs. deliberative) mindset increases motivation and therefore leads to shorter, but equally biased time predictions.
    Social Psychology 03/2015; 46(2):104-115. DOI:10.1027/1864-9335/a000231 · 1.89 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "On the other hand, these designs can strategically be difficult to employ. Although the use of experimental design to test for mediation is not new, only recently has this approach received more attention in the literature (Imai, Tingley, & Yamamoto, 2013; MacKinnon, 2008; Spencer et al., 2005). New developments in modern causal methods can be combined with experimental designs to achieve more evidence for mediated effects. "
    01/2015;
Show more