Article

Actigraphy scoring reliability in the study of osteoporotic fractures.

San Francisco Coordinating Center and California Pacific Medical Center Research Institute, San Francisco, CA 94107, USA.
Sleep (Impact Factor: 5.1). 12/2005; 28(12):1599-605.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The editing and scoring of actigraphy data are important for calculating variables that describe sleep. Scoring is dependent on marking time points for when a participant got in and out of bed, plus time when the actigraph was removed. This placement of time points is subject to error. We examined interscorer reliability to determine if files scored by 2 different people were comparable.
Observational study.
Community-based.
A subset of 36 women taken from the latest biannual visit of the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures. All women had actigraphy data scored by 1 scorer for the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures staff, plus a blinded rescoring by an expert scorer at a different site.
N/A.
The outcomes of interest from actigraphy are duration of in-bed interval, total sleep time, sleep latency, sleep efficiency, wake after sleep onset, total nap time, and total daytime minutes of watch removal. Clearly documented actigraphy scoring procedures were used. There were no significant differences between the expert scorer and the study scorer in sleep outcomes (all P values >.16 from a paired t test). There was a small but statistically significant difference between scorers for watch removal times (mean absolute difference 3.4 minutes +/- 5.4, P=.02). The intraclass correlation coefficients showed a high level of agreement (range, 0.84-0.99).
Even in a large study with 2 scorers, it is possible to use actigraphy as a measure of sleep without introducing interscorer measurement error. Using well-documented scoring and data-gathering procedures are essential for data quality control.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
94 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Sleep disorders are common in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). An important aspect of intervention studies in patients with sleep disorders is the choice of assessment strategy. This paper presents a literature review concerning assessment strategies for measuring sleep in intervention studies with AD patients, with a focus on actigraphy. Thirty-seven articles were selected for this review, having analysis of sleep/nocturnal rhythm disturbances by actigraphy as the primary or secondary outcome. The advantages and limitations of actigraphy were discussed vis-à-vis polysomnography and subjective interventions. The following methodological aspects were addressed: impact of experimental design and patient setting, inclusion and exclusion criteria, placement of the actigraphy device, adherence to the regimen, duration of recordings and the choice of sleep parameters. Our analyses suggest that the methods used in intervention studies encompassing sleep disorders and dementia could be improved by increasing accuracy of diagnosis, categorization of sleep disturbances, adherence to actigraphy, and by clearly defining the variables and endpoints in each study. Also, controlling variables that could interfere with sleep and describing the data processing and analysis might improve interpretation of results.
    Sleep Medicine Reviews 05/2013; · 8.68 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Short sleep duration is associated with adverse health outcomes, but the mechanisms involved are unknown. It has been postulated that short sleep duration may elevate cortisol levels, but studies have had conflicting results. It is unclear whether these differing findings may be due to methodological issues, such as assessment of sleep duration. Specifically, objective versus subjective methods of measuring habitual sleep duration may account for the conflicting results found in epidemiological studies. Our goal was to determine whether habitual sleep duration, measured objectively (by actigraphy) and subjectively (by self-report), was associated with 24-hour urine free cortisol (UFC), a measure of integrated cortisol secretion. Our secondary goal was to determine whether slow wave sleep (SWS, determined by polysomnography) was associated with 24-hour UFC. Cross sectional study of community dwelling older men. 325 men (mean age = 76.6 years, SD = 5.5) from the Portland site of the MrOS Sleep Study, who underwent 24-hour urine collection, polysomnography, actigraphy and sleep questionnaire. 24-hour UFC. In this study of community dwelling older men, self-reported sleep duration was inversely related to 24-hour UFC levels. Participants reporting <5 hours of habitual sleep had an adjusted mean 24-hour UFC of 29.8 ug, compared to 28.0 ug in participants reporting >5 to <8 hours of sleep 25.5 ug in those reporting >8 hours of habitual sleep. However, sleep duration determined by actigraphy was not associated with 24-hour UFC in either univariable or multivariable regression models. SWS was not associated with 24-hour UFC. Objectively measured (i.e., actigraphic) sleep duration is not associated with 24-hour UFC in these community dwelling older men. This finding, together with prior studies, suggests that elevated levels of integrated cortisol secretion is not the mechanisms by which short sleep duration leads to adverse health outcomes.
    PLoS ONE 01/2013; 8(9):e75205. · 3.53 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To test the hypothesis that subjective and objective sleep disturbances are associated with risk of incident falls in older men. The prospective observational MrOS Sleep Study. Six academic clinical centers in the United States. Community-dwelling men aged 67 and older (mean 76) (n = 3,101). Subjective sleep measurements included daytime sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)), sleep quality (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)), and total sleep time (TST). Objective sleep measurements included actigraphic TST and sleep efficiency (an index of fragmentation) and sleep disordered breathing (measured using in-home polysomnography). Fall frequency during the subsequent year was ascertained three times per year using questionnaires. Recurrent falling was defined as having two or more falls in the subsequent year. In multivariable-adjusted models, participants with excessive daytime sleepiness (ESS > 10) but not poor subjective sleep quality (PSQI > 5) had greater odds of experiencing two or more falls in the subsequent year (odds ratio (OR) = 1.52 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.14-2.03). Based on actigraphic recordings, the odds of having recurrent falls was higher for men who slept 5 hours or less (OR = 1.79, 95% CI = 1.22-2.60) than for those who slept 7 to 8 hours. Actigraphically measured sleep efficiency was also associated with greater risk of falls, as was nocturnal hypoxemia (≥10% of sleep time with arterial oxygen saturation <90%; OR = 1.62, 95% CI = 1.17-2.24) but not apnea hypopnea index. Subjective and objective sleep disturbances were associated with risk of falls in older men, independent of confounders.
    Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 02/2014; 62(2):299-305. · 4.22 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

View
81 Downloads
Available from
May 20, 2014