[A phase I study of combination chemotherapy using TS-1 and weekly paclitaxel for advanced gastric cancer].
Dept. of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University.Gan to kagaku ryoho. Cancer & chemotherapy 02/2006; 33(1):45-8.
The safety of chemotherapy combining TS-1 and weekly paclitaxel for the treatment of unresectable and recurrent gastric cancer was evaluated in this study. Paclitaxel was administered by intravenous drip infusion at a starting dose (level 1) of 50 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15. TS-1 was administered orally at a dose of 40 mg/m2twice a day for 2 weeks (days 1-14) followed by 2 weeks rest. A total of 9 patients were enrolled in this study. Two out of 6 patients treated with level 1 suffered from leukocytopenia and neutropenia, which were determined as dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Three patients were treated with level 2, in which the dose of paclitaxel was increased up to 60 mg/m2. One of 3 patients suffered from grade 3 diarrhea and one patient from grade 4 leukocytopenia, eutrocytopenia, anemia, and stomatitis, which were determined as DLT. According to these results,level 1 of this regimen was recommended as a safe treatment for gastric cancer patients. A phase II study will be performed to evaluate the efficacy of the combination chemotherapy.
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: This study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of S-1 and paclitaxel combination therapy for patients with advanced gastric cancer. Eligible patients had previously untreated advanced or relapsed gastric cancer with measurable lesion(s) and an ECOG PS of 0-2. Treatment consisted of S-1 35 mg/m(2) p.o. b.i.d. on days 1-14 followed by a 7-day off plus paclitaxel 70 mg/m(2) i.v. on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. Fifty-six patients (M/F = 37/19) were enrolled. The median age was 59 years. The median number of cycles administered was six (range 1-18). Out of the 53 patients evaluated, there was 1 (1.9%) CR, 20 (37.7%) confirmed PRs, 5 (9.4%) unconfirmed PRs, 21 (39.6%) SDs, and 6 (11.3%) PDs. The objective tumor response was 39.6%. The median time to progression was 29 weeks. The median survival was 51 weeks. All 56 patients were assessed for treatment safety. The treatment was well tolerated with grade 3/4 neutropenia in 20%/13%, grade 3 febrile neutropenia in 7%, grade 2/3 diarrhea in 9%/4%, vomiting in 11%/0%, stomatitis in 4%/4%, and neuropathy in 4%/0% of patients. S-1 and paclitaxel combination treatment is an effective regimen with a favorable toxicity profile in patients with advanced gastric cancer.Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 10/2008; 63(6):1083-90. DOI:10.1007/s00280-008-0818-3 · 2.77 Impact Factor
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: A multicenter phase II study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a combination regimen of weekly paclitaxel plus S-1 in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Patients with previously untreated metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer received intravenous paclitaxel 50 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15, plus oral S-1 40 mg/m(2) b.i.d. on days 1 to 14 followed by 2 weeks off, in a 28-day cycle. A total of 54 patients were registered. All of them had measurable disease and were determined to be eligible for the present study. Two complete responses and 23 partial responses were confirmed, giving an overall response rate of 46.3%. At a final follow up of 3 years, the median progression-free survival and median overall survival were 6.0 and 14.3 months, respectively. Grade 3 neutropenia occurred in 14 patients, and grade 4 in 1 patient (total, 27.8%). The most serious nonhematological toxicity was diarrhea, where grade 3 occurred in 5 patients (9.3%). There were no treatment-related deaths. A combination of weekly paclitaxel plus S-1 was found to be well tolerated and effective in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Further investigation with comparative trials is needed for confirmation.Gastric Cancer 08/2010; 13(3):149-54. DOI:10.1007/s10120-010-0548-1 · 3.72 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.