Gastric Bypass as Treatment for Obesity: Trends, Characteristics, and Complications

RTI International, National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Washington, DC 20036-3209, USA.
Obesity research (Impact Factor: 4.95). 01/2006; 13(12):2202-9. DOI: 10.1038/oby.2005.273
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This paper describes national trends in gastric bypass procedures from 1998 through 2003 and explores the demographic and health profile of those who receive this procedure. Short-term outcomes such as length of stay and in-hospital complication rates are also examined.
Data on obese hospital inpatients who had gastric bypass were obtained from the 1998 to 2003 National Hospital Discharge Survey. Gastric bypass was reported for an estimated 288,000 discharges during the 6-year study period. Trends within the 6-year period were tested using weighted regression. Characteristics of gastric bypass patients were compared with those of other inpatients using a chi(2) test of independence and the two-sided t test.
The estimated number of hospital discharges with gastric bypass increased significantly, from 14,000 in 1998 to 108,000 in 2003. During this period, the average length of stay declined by 56% from 7.2 to 3.2 days. Gastric bypass patients were primarily women (84%), 25 to 54 years of age (82%), and privately insured (76%). A 1 in 10 complication rate was found for discharges with gastric bypass.
Gastric bypass procedures in the United States have increased rapidly since 1998, whereas the average hospital stay has decreased. The decreasing length of stay needs to be evaluated in conjunction with potential complication rates and the permanent change in anatomy and lifestyle that must accompany this procedure. Monitoring trends in use of this procedure is important, especially if reimbursement policies change and the epidemic of obesity continues.

Download full-text


Available from: Maria F Owings, Dec 17, 2014
1 Follower
38 Reads
  • Source
    • "Many of the financial costs to the health care system from our current food production system are hidden or have been purposefully externalized. Though we know that the costs associated with antibiotic resistance,67–69 pesticides,11,12 and obesity2,70 are significant, and unquestionably negatively impact the cost of health care, we do not have a sufficient economic analysis to understand the magnitude of these costs to engage the health care community from a strict economic perspective. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Health care leaders are broadening their awareness to include the need to address the food system as a means to individual, public, and global health, above and beyond basic nutritional factors. Key voices from the health care sector have begun to engage in market transformation and are aggregating to articulate the urgency for engagement in food and agricultural policy. Systemic transformation requires a range of policies that complement one another and address various aspects of the food system. Health care involvement in policy and advocacy is vital to solve the expanding ecological health crises facing our nation and globe and will require an urgency that may be unprecedented.
    Journal of Hunger & Environmental Nutrition 07/2009; 4(3-4):409-429. DOI:10.1080/19320240903329055
  • Source
    • "Late mortality rates remained low at 0.6% to 1.1% for RYGB and 0.1% for AGB. The true incidence of morbidity is more difficult to calculate, but may occur in 10% to 20% of patients [18] [51a]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Bariatric surgery, although not a cure for obesity, can help selected extremely obese adolescents achieve significant weight loss and improvement of obesity-related comorbidities, in conjunction with continued dietary and behavioral interventions. This article summarizes the current guidelines for selection of adolescent candidates for bariatric surgery and discusses the types of bariatric procedures presently available for this age group. Data on the complications and outcomes of bariatric surgery in this special population are reviewed.
    Adolescent Medicine Clinics 11/2006; 17(3):589-612; abstract x. DOI:10.1016/j.admecli.2006.06.001
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: With the failure of traditional weight loss plans, bariatric surgery has become the treatment of choice for morbid obesity. The primary objective of this study was to track body composition and metabolic changes for 1 year following bariatric surgery. 19 bariatric patients (14 female, 5 male) began the study and completed 12 months of testing, which included data collection within 1 week preoperatively and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. 2 female subjects were lost to the study between 6 months and 1 year, resulting in 17 subjects (12 female, 5 male) completing the entire 12-month follow-up. Variables measured in this study included weight, lean body mass (LBM), fat mass (FM), % body fat and basal metabolic rate (BMR). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) using the general linear model indicated significant (P<.05) losses for weight, FM, and % fat for all time periods. Significant losses in LBM were observed in all time periods except 6-12 months, where no change in LBM (60.6 vs 61.1 kg) was observed. A significant decrease (P<.05) in BMR (2091 vs 1758) was observed only from pre-surgery to 1 month post-surgery. Thereafter, there was no significant change in BMR (1758 vs 1647 vs 1651 vs 1674) respectively. Changes in LBM were correlated with changes in BMR at both 6-12 months (r=.545, P=.024) and preoperatively to 12 months postoperatively (r=.608, P=.01). There were no significant changes in the BMR/LBM ratio over the 12-month period (28.3 vs 25.0 vs 27.3 vs 27.2 vs 27.4), indicating no adaptation of the body to an energy-conserving mechanism. Bariatric surgery appears to have been highly successful over the 12-month follow-up period, with 50.9 kg weight loss, 38.3 kg (75.2%) FM loss, and 12.6 kg (24.8%) LBM loss. The 417 kcal loss in BMR (2091 to 1674), while significant, was not greater than what would be predicted from loss of LBM.
    Obesity Surgery 12/2006; 16(12):1602-8. DOI:10.1381/096089206779319347 · 3.75 Impact Factor
Show more