Article

Characterization of host-guest complexes of cucurbit[n]uril (n = 6, 7) by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry.

Department of Applied Chemistry, Kansai University, Yamatecho, Suita 564-8680, Japan.
Journal of Mass Spectrometry (Impact Factor: 2.71). 03/2006; 41(2):202-7. DOI: 10.1002/jms.978
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT When an intramolecular cavity exists in a molecule, it can trap another chemical species to form a host-guest complex. We examine the formation of such an inclusion complex with cucurbit[n]uril (CBn, n = 6, 7) as the host to trap alkali metal or ammonium ions as the guest, by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS). The results show that the inclusion complexes are formed between the three-dimensional cylinder of CBn hosts and the guest cations. Selectivity of the complex formation is dependent both on (1) ion-dipole interactions between the cylindrical portal of the CBn hosts and the guest cations and (2) the hydrophobic interactions at the inner cavity of CBn.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
83 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This work investigates the interaction between cadmium(II) and cucurbit[6]uril. When the effect of the scan rate on the cadmium(II)/cucurbit[6]uril complex was investigated, it was concluded that the conditions used were not suitable for calculating cadmium(II)/cucurbit[6]uril stoichiometries as the results were influenced by the adsorption of cucurbit[6]uril on the working electrode. Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry was used to verify the cadmium(II)/cucurbit[6]uril interaction. Competitive experiments with cations fromthe electrolyte and guests, such as acetic acid, isobutylammonium, and 1,5-pentanediammonium, were performed. The results showed that the larger the Group I element cation used in the supporting electrolyte, the higher the interference produced. Acetic acid and 1,5-pentanediammonium guests impeded the cadmium(II)/cucurbit[6]uril interaction, whereas isobutylammonium partially impeded this interaction, suggesting that cucurbit[6]uril bound two acetic acid molecules due to its short alkyl chain.
    Analytical Letters 01/2015; 48(5). · 0.98 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Inclusion compound of a macrocyclic cavitand cucurbit[8]uril (C48H48N32O16, CB[8]) with a square-planar palladium(II) complex of a polyamine ligand cyclam, {[Pd(cyclam)]@CB[8]}Cl2·16⅓H2O (1), was synthesized and characterized by X-ray crystallography, elemental analysis, IR, and electrospray ionization (ESI) mass spectrometry. The complex [Pd(cyclam)]2+ undergoes chemical oxidation within the CB[8] cavity leading to the formation of the palladium(IV) inclusion compound {trans-[Pd(cyclam)Cl2]@CB[8]}Cl2·14H2O (2). The Pd(II) and Pd(IV) complexes are completely encapsulated within the CB[8] cavity. The cyclam ring in 1 and 2 adopts the most stable configuration (trans-III (S,S,R,R)).
    Inorganica Chimica Acta 12/2010; 363(15):4387-4391. · 2.04 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Using the isothermal calorimetric titration technique, we determined the stability constants (K), reaction enthalpy (ΔH°), and entropy (ΔS°) for complexation of cucurbit[6]uril (CB[6]) with a series of aliphatic alcohols, mono- and diamines, as well as spermidine and spermine, in aqueous solutions of alkali metal chlorides. The K for spermine reached 5.4 × 10 M in 0.2 M LiCl, which is the largest amongst the values reported for CB[6]. Propylamine forms the strongest 1:1 complex with CB[6] (K = 21000 M) in 0.1 M Na acetate buffer, which is driven exclusively by entropy. A comparison of K for 1,3-propanediamine versus 1,4-butanediamine reveals an extraordinary >60000-fold enhancement in affinity, which is the largest increment/CH2 ever observed in supramolecular chemistry. The present results in combination with our ESI-MS data reported recently unambiguously demonstrate that CB[6] exists in aqueous solution of alkali metal salts exclusively as a dicationic species, e.g. [CB[6]·2Na].
    Supramolecular Chemistry 03/2007; 19:39-46. · 2.13 Impact Factor