Medical expulsive treatment of distal-ureteral stones using tamsulosin: a single-center experience.

Department of Urology, Second University, Naples, Italy.
Journal of Endourology (Impact Factor: 2.1). 02/2006; 20(1):12-6. DOI: 10.1089/end.2006.20.12
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To evaluate the efficacy of the addition of tamsulosin to our standard expulsive pharmacologic therapy for the treatment of distal-ureteral stones.
A series of 96 patients referred to our department for the management of symptomatic distal-ureteral calculi were randomly divided into group 1 (N = 46) who received diclofenac (100 mg/daily) plus aescin (80 mg/daily) and group 2 (N = 50) who received the same therapy plus tamsulosin (0.4 mg/daily) for a maximum of 2 weeks. There were no differences between the groups with respect to age, sex, or stone size. The primary endpoint was the expulsion rate. Expulsion time, need for analgesics, need for hospitalization, and drug side effects were the secondary endpoints.
The expulsion rate was significantly higher in group 2 (90%) than in group 1 (58.7%; P = 0.01), and group 2 achieved stone passage in a shorter time (mean 4.4 v 7.5 days, respectively; P = 0.005). Lower analgesic use was found in group 2 (P = 0.003), as well as significantly fewer hospitalizations for recurrent colic (P = 0.01). Both groups experienced few side effects associated with expulsive therapy.
A conservative approach should be considered as an option in the management of uncomplicated distal-ureteral stones. Even if the best pharmacologic expulsive regimen remains to be established, the use of the selective alpha-blocker tamsulosin is recommended in this setting.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We evaluate the efficiency of α-adrenergic antagonists on stone clearance after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) in patients with lower ureteral stones. A total of 356 patients with solitary lower ureteral stones who underwent single ESWL sessions were divided into 2 groups. Group 1 received our standard medical therapy, and Group 2 was treated with 0.4 mg/day tamsulosin for a maximum of 2 weeks. All patients were re-evaluated with plain film radiography and ultrasound each week during the treatment period. A computed tomography scan was systematically performed 3 months after ESWL. In total, 82 of the 170 patients in Group 1 (48.2%) and 144 of the 186 patients in Group 2 (77.4%) (p = 0.002) were stone-free. Among the patients with stones 10 to 15 mm in diameter, the stone-free rate was 38.4% in Group 1 and 77.1% in Group 2 (p = 0.003). Average stone expulsion time was 10.6 days and 8.4 days in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. Ureteral colic occurred in 40 patients (23.5%) in Group 1, but only in 10 patients (5.3%) in Group 2 (p = 0.043). The only side effect of tamsulosin was slight dizziness in 5 of the 186 patients in Group 2 (2.6%). Adjunctive therapy with α1-adrenergic antagonists after ESWL is more efficient than, and equally as safe as, lithotripsy alone to manage patients with lower ureteral stones. The adding of α-blockers is more reliable and helpful for stones with a large dimension, and can also decrease stone elimination time and episodes of ureteral colic.
    Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada 01/2014; 8(1-2):E8-E11. · 1.92 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Medical expulsive therapy (MET) using alpha-blockers is effective for distal ureteral calculi (UC). We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of tamsulosin for proximal UC expulsion. An open-label randomized controlled trial was conducted with 108 patients who agreed to conservative management for single, radiopaque, proximal UC ≤ 6 mm and were randomized into group A (n = 54, conservative managements only) or B (n = 54, 0.2 mg tamsulosin once a day). The primary end-point was stone passage rates (SPR) in the intention-to-treat population in 4 treatment weeks. The secondary end-points were estimated in per-protocol population and were time to stone passage, post-trial Euro-quality-of-life (EuroQOL) score, oral analgesic requirements, and willingness to undergo conservative treatment again. The two groups were well balanced in terms of baseline patient and stone characteristics. Seventy nine patients (73.2%; 35 of group A and 44 of group B) completed the study protocol. The overall SPR was 60.2% (65/108). Group B had a higher SPR (74.1%; 40/54) than group A (46.3%; 25/54; p = 0.003) and a significantly shorter time to stone passage (mean days, A: 19.6 vs. B: 14.3, p = 0.005). The groups did not differ in post-trial EuroQOL score or oral analgesic requirements, whereas 74.3% (26/35) of group A and 90.9% (40/44) of group B were willing to undergo conservative treatment again (p = 0.048). Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that stone size (OR = 1.447, p = 0.045) and tamsulosin treatment (OR = 3.314, p = 0.004) significantly predicted stone expulsion. On multivariate analysis, only tamsulosin was statistically significant (OR=3.198, p = 0.021). Tamsulosin was associated with significantly higher stone expulsion rate and shorter expulsion time in proximal UC ≤ 6 mm compared with conservative managements only. Our results indicate that similar to patients with distal UC, MET using tamsulosin is a reasonable treatment option for patients with proximal UC.
    International Journal of Clinical Practice 12/2013; · 2.54 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Medical expulsive therapy (MET) has been described as an effective conservative treatment option in the initial management of small distal ureteral stones. Therapies that have been investigated include alpha-blockers, calcium channel blockers, corticosteroids, and most recently phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (PDE5) inhibitors. While alpha-blockers are currently the only recommended monotherapy, corticosteroids have received increased attention as a potential useful adjunct in the medical management of distal stones. PDE5 inhibitors are a novel treatment alternative, requiring further investigation. This review provides an overview of recent MET best practices, with a focus on novel therapies beyond alpha-blockers.
    11/2014; 8(11-12):442-5.

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Jun 6, 2014