Young adult outcome of hyperactive children: adaptive functioning in major life activities.
ABSTRACT The authors report the adaptive functioning of hyperactive and control children in southeastern Wisconsin (Milwaukee) followed to young adulthood.
Interviews with participants concerning major life activities were collected between 1992 and 1996 and used along with employer ratings and high school records at the young adult follow-up (mean = 20 years, range 19-25) for this large sample of hyperactive (H; n = 149) and community control (CC; n = 72) children initially seen in 1978-1980 and studied for at least 13 years. Age, duration of follow-up, and IQ were statistically controlled as needed.
The H group had significantly lower educational performance and attainment, with 32% failing to complete high school. H group members had been fired from more jobs and manifested greater employer-rated attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and oppositional defiant disorder symptoms and lower job performance than the CC group. Socially, the H group had fewer close friends, more trouble keeping friends, and more social problems as rated by parents. Far more H than CC group members had become parents (38% versus 4%) and had been treated for sexually transmitted disease (16% versus 4%). Severity of lifetime conduct disorder was predictive of several of the most salient outcomes (failure to graduate, earlier sexual intercourse, early parenthood) whereas attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and oppositional defiant disorder at work were predictive of job performance and risk of being fired.
These findings corroborate prior research and go further in identifying sexual activity and early parenthood as additional problematic domains of adaptive functioning at adulthood.
Full-textDOI: · Available from: Russell A Barkley, Jan 21, 2014
Click to see the full-text of:
Article: Young adult outcome of hyperactive children: adaptive functioning in major life activities.
SourceAvailable from: Maria A Rogers
Article: The Ecology of ADHD in the Schools[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Overwhelming evidence suggests that a diagnosis of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in childhood has profound and far-reaching effects on children's functioning in the school environment. In this article, we draw on a wide range of research studies to summarize the state of our knowledge about the academic functioning of children with ADHD and discuss intervention approaches that align with these areas. We use ecological systems theory to outline the various factors that are related to school functioning for children with ADHD at the child, classroom, and family levels. We place a particular emphasis on the importance of high-quality relationships within the delivery of interventions and highlight the need for sustainable, collaborative, and contex-tual interventions if we are to meet the complex and heterogeneous needs of children with ADHD in the school setting.02/2015; 2(1). DOI:10.1007/s40474-015-0038-6
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to assess the role of protective factors as mediators and/or moderators of the relationship between coexisting emotional and conduct problems and quality of life (QoL) among adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The sample consisted of 194 adolescents with ADHD. Participants completed measures of individual competencies, family cohesion and social support, and QoL. Coexisting emotional and conduct problems were assessed using the Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire. Individual competencies and social support mediated the association between emotional and conduct problems and QoL. Family cohesion was associated with both emotional and conduct problems. No moderating effects of protective factors and coexisting problems were found. The assessment of individual competencies, social resources, and family cohesion may identify potential treatment goals for adolescents with ADHD and coexisting problems, and may contribute to improvements in QoL.BMC Psychiatry 05/2015; 15(1):108. DOI:10.1186/s12888-015-0491-0 · 2.24 Impact Factor