Article

Probing the surface adsorption and photocatalytic degradation of catechols on TiO2 by solid-state NMR spectroscopy.

Institute of Scientific and Industrial Research (SANKEN), Osaka University, Mihogaoka 8-1, Ibaraki, Osaka 567-0047, Japan.
Langmuir (Impact Factor: 4.38). 02/2006; 22(3):893-6. DOI: 10.1021/la051967p
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The local structure of the TiO2 surface modified with electron-donating bidentate ligands, such as catechols, has been investigated by solid-state NMR spectroscopy. The adsorption and degradation processes of catechols at the TiO2 surface were observed. The photocatalytic degradation mechanism of catechols at the TiO2 surface was interpreted in terms of the interfacial charge recombination reaction with conduction band electrons.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
45 Views
  • Chemistry Letters 01/2010; 39(1):44-45. · 1.59 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Nanoscale mapping of adsorption sites for molecules or ions at solid–liquid interfaces has not been explored in detail because of the difficulty in probing both stochastic adsorption/desorption events and heterogeneous surface structures. We report here the application of single-molecule-based super-resolution fluorescence microscopy using a catechol-modified boron–dipyrromethene dye (CA-BODIPY), which serves as a fluorescent reporter, to identify the locations of effective adsorption sites on metal oxide surfaces. Upon adsorption on a TiO2 nanoparticle, individual CA-BODIPY molecules exhibited detectable fluorescence because of the formation of chelating complexes between the catechol moiety and the surface Ti sites. Interestingly, a significant effect of the crystal face on the adsorption preference for CA-BODIPY was found in the case of anatase TiO2 microcrystals in neutral water: {101} > {001} ≈ {100}. In an aprotic solvent such as acetonitrile, however, the opposite crystal face effect was observed; this implies a significant contribution of solvent molecules to the adsorption of organic compounds on specific surfaces. From the quantitative analysis of the formation rate of fluorescent complexes per unit area, it was found that nanometer-sized TiO2 crystals have superior adsorptivity over micrometer-sized TiO2 crystals and an atomically flat TiO2 surface. This observation is consistent with the higher density of surface defects on the nanoparticles. Furthermore, it was revealed that CA-BODIPY molecules are preferentially adsorbed on the top branches of α-Fe2O3 micropines, where a high density of exposed Fe cations is expected. Our methodology and findings yield new insights into the mechanisms underlying the synthesis and (photo)catalytic activity of metal oxide particles with different sizes and shapes.
    The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 05/2013; 117(21):11219–11228. · 4.84 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Different surface morphologies of TiO2 thin films were prepared by hydrothermal synthesis method on Ti substrates through changing reaction time. The microstructure, composition, optical properties and photocatalytic properties of TiO2 thin films were systematically investigated by x-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, x-ray photoelectron spectrometer and ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy. As the reaction time increases, anatase structure and brookite structure of TiO2 films respectively increases and decreases, corresponding to surface morphology changes from irregular structure to regular geometrical shape structure. These structural changes are accompanied by significant variations of optical properties and photocatalytic properties including a widening of the band gap from 2.86 to 3.19 eV, photocatalytic degradation efficiency from 92.5 to 98.1% and photocatalytic degradation rate from 0.032 to 0.048 min−1. Among all samples, TiO2-1 shows the best photocatalytic properties. Compositional analysis indicates that TiO2 surface layer contains Ti and O elements, the ratio of Ti:O is 1:2.28 which is close to the atom ratio of TiO2.
    Applied Surface Science 10/2014; 315:299–306. · 2.54 Impact Factor