The SH4-Unique-SH3-SH2 domains dictate specificity in signaling that differentiate c-Yes from c-Src

Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Cell Biology, West Virginia University School of Medicine, PO Box 9300, Morgantown 26506, USA.
Journal of Cell Science (Impact Factor: 5.33). 07/2003; 116(Pt 12):2585-98. DOI: 10.1242/jcs.00466
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT c-Src and c-Yes are highly homologous members of the Src family of non-receptor tyrosine kinases. The overall sequence similarity between c-Src and c-Yes allows them to perform many overlapping functions. However, the phenotypes of the c-src and c-yes knockout mice, and cells derived from them, are quite different, indicating functional specificity between the two proteins. Specifically, c-src-/- cells are deficient in several processes that require dynamic regulation of the actin cytoskeleton. In order to begin to understand why c-Yes is unable to compensate for c-Src signaling, we used a series of Src/Yes chimeras in which the non-catalytic functional domains of Src527F were replaced by those of c-Yes. Using chicken embryo fibroblasts as a model system, our results indicate that the c-Yes N-terminal SH4-Unique domains are sufficient to inhibit the ability of Src527F to alter cell morphology, induce actin filament rearrangements or stimulate motility or invasive potential. The data also indicate that the SH4-Unique-SH3-SH2 domains of c-Yes work cooperatively and prevent activation of signaling proteins associated with Src527F transformation, including activation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, phosphorylation of c-Raf and Akt and downregulation of RhoA-GTP. These data indicate that c-Yes may not modulate signals associated with c-Src-induced changes in actin filament integrity and may explain why c-Yes fails to compensate for c-Src signaling in src-/- cells.

Download full-text


Available from: Xianglin Shi, Aug 19, 2014
1 Follower
  • Source
    • "RecombinantSTYkinasewasincubatedwithrecombinantsubstrateinthe presenceof3mCiof[ 32 P]ATPand2.5mMATPinatotalvolumeof50mLof kinasebuffer(20mMTris-HCl,pH7.5,5mMMgCl2,and0.5mMMnCl2).Exact amountsofkinaseandsubstrateproteinsusedfortheindividualexperiments aregiveninthefigurelegends.Thereactionwascarriedoutfor10minat23°C andstoppedbyadding12mLofSDSsamplebuffer.Kinasereactionswith CPK4wereaccomplishedinkinasebuffercontaining7mMCaCl2and1mM DTTinsteadofMnCl2,andYeskinasereactionswereperformedin20mM MOPS,pH7.9,and5mMMgCl2.PurifiedYeskinase(Summyetal.,2003)was polyacrylamidegelfollowedbyautoradiography.Fortheinhibitionstudies, theSTYkinasewaspreincubatedfor10minwiththeinhibitorsJNJ-10198409, tyrphostin,andJanex1(Cayman)attheindicatedconcentrations.Thereaction wasthencarriedoutasdescribedbefore.Thereactionproductwasseparated ona12%SDS-polyacrylamidegel,theCoomassieblue-stainedproteinbands werecutoutfromthegel,andtheradioactivitywasdeterminedbyliquid scintillationcounting. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), transit peptides for chloroplast-destined preproteins can be phosphorylated by the protein kinases STY8, STY17, and STY46. In this study, we have investigated the in vitro properties of these plant-specific kinases. Characterization of the mechanistic functioning of STY8 led to the identification of an essential threonine in the activation segment, which is phosphorylated by an intramolecular mechanism. STY8 is inhibited by specific tyrosine kinase inhibitors, although it lacked the ability to phosphorylate tyrosine residues in vitro. In vivo analysis of sty8, sty17, and sty46 Arabidopsis knockout/knockdown mutants revealed a distinct function of the three kinases in the greening process and in the efficient differentiation of chloroplasts. Mutant plants displayed not only a delayed accumulation of chlorophyll but also a reduction of nucleus-encoded chloroplast proteins and a retarded establishment of photosynthetic capacity during the first 6 h of deetiolation, supporting a role of cytosolic STY kinases in chloroplast differentiation.
    Plant physiology 07/2011; 157(1):70-85. DOI:10.1104/pp.111.182774 · 7.39 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "It has been reported that c-Yes and c-Src are differentially regulated during the cell cycle progression of colorectal carcinoma cells [16]. Studies in fibroblasts indicate that c-Yes is unable to compensate for c-Src signaling in several processes that require dynamic regulation of the actin cytoskeleton and that this can be attributed to the diverse structure of SH4- Unique-SH3-SH2 domains of these proteins [30]. Differences in c-Src and c-Yes signaling with respect to a variety of intracellular processes have also been described in several other cell types (reviewed in Summy et al. [11]). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Increases in the levels and/or activity of nonreceptor tyrosine kinases c-Src and c-Yes are often associated with colorectal carcinogenesis. The physiological consequences of increased c-Yes activity during the early and late stages of tumorigenesis, in addition to the degree of redundancy between c-Yes and c-Src in colorectal cancer cells, remain elusive. To study the consequences of increases in c-Yes levels and activity in later stages of colorectal carcinogenesis, we developed human colorectal cancer cell lines in which c-Yes levels and activity can be inducibly increased by a tightly controlled expression of wild-type c-Yes or by constitutively active mutants of c-Yes, c-YesY537F, and c-Yes Delta t6aa. c-Yes induction resulted in increased cell motility but did not promote proliferation either in vitro or in vivo. These results suggest that in later stages of colorectal carcinogenesis, elevations in c-Yes levels/activity may promote cancer spread and metastasis rather than tumor growth.
    Neoplasia (New York, N.Y.) 10/2007; 9(9):745-54. DOI:10.1593/neo.07442 · 5.40 Impact Factor
  • Source
Show more