Case-finding for depression among medical outpatients in the Veterans Health Administration.

Mental Illness Research, Education, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut 06516, USA.
Medical Care (Impact Factor: 2.94). 03/2006; 44(2):175-81. DOI: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000196962.97345.21
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT We sought to determine the rates and predictors of screening, screening positive, follow-up evaluation, and subsequent diagnosis of depression among medical outpatients.
This was a cross-sectional study using chart-review data from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) 2002 External Peer Review Program merged with administrative data.
We studied a national sample of VA medical outpatients with no depression diagnosis or mental health visits in the past 6 months (n = 21,489) and used chart-review and administrative data to follow the chain of events from depression screening to diagnosis.
Overall, 84.9% of eligible patients (n = 18,245) were screened for depression in the past year. Of the 8.8% who screened positive, only 54.0% received follow-up evaluation and, of these, 23.6% (n = 204) subsequently were diagnosed with a depressive disorder (representing 1.1% of the originally screened sample). Patients who were younger, unmarried, and had more medical comorbidities were less likely to be screened; however, if screened, they were more likely to screen positive. Male gender and greater medical comorbidity were associated with decreased odds of follow-up evaluation after a positive screen. At the facility level, likelihood of depression screening was inversely associated with spending on teaching and research but positively associated with spending on mental health care.
VA's depression case-finding activities yielded relatively few positive cases, raising questions about cost-effectiveness. Targeted strategies may increase the value of case-finding among patients at greatest risk for depression and at more academically affiliated medical centers. Targeted efforts also are needed to ensure proper follow-up evaluation of suspected cases, particularly among male patients and those with increased medical comorbidity.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A new method for characterizing surface topography using a 2-dimensional discrete wavelet transform (2-D DWT) has been developed. The wavelet transform (WT) is the basis for a wide range of techniques applied in image processing and pattern recognition. Its main advantages over other feature extraction methods are the space-frequency localization, and the multi-resolution view of the frequency components of a signal. In this paper, an automatic grinding modes classification technique using a 2-D DWT is introduced, and comparisons of automatic grinding modes classification and human eye inspection are also examined
    Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation, 1996. EFTA '96. Proceedings., 1996 IEEE Conference on; 12/1996
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Electronic medical records systems (EMR) contain many directly analyzable data fields that may reduce the need for extensive chart review, thus allowing for performance measures to be assessed on a larger proportion of patients in care. This study sought to determine the extent to which selected chart review-based clinical performance measures could be accurately replicated using readily available and directly analyzable EMR data. A cross-sectional study using full chart review results from the Veterans Health Administration's External Peer Review Program (EPRP) was merged to EMR data. Over 80% of the data on these selected measures found in chart review was available in a directly analyzable form in the EMR. The extent of missing EMR data varied by site of care (P<0.01). Among patients on whom both sources of data were available, we found a high degree of correlation between the 2 sources in the measures assessed (correlations of 0.89-0.98) and in the concordance between the measures using performance cut points (kappa: 0.86-0.99). Furthermore, there was little evidence of bias; the differences in values were not clinically meaningful (difference of 0.9 mg/dL for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, 1.2 mm Hg for systolic blood pressure, 0.3 mm Hg for diastolic, and no difference for HgbA1c). Directly analyzable data fields in the EMR can accurately reproduce selected EPRP measures on most patients. We found no evidence of systematic differences in performance values among these with and without directly analyzable data in the EMR.
    Medical Care 01/2007; 45(1):73-9. DOI:10.1097/01.mlr.0000244510.09001.e5 · 2.94 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We sought to describe the proportion of veterans with diabetes screened for depression compared with the general population of veterans. Electronic medical records (fiscal years 2001-2004) from a Midwestern Veterans Health Administration (VHA) facility and VHA External Peer Review Program (EPRP) data were used for the study. Facility-level data included inpatient and outpatient encounters, which included depression screen results. EPRP data were facility-level summary data, which detailed the proportion of general population veterans nationwide and patients at the Midwestern facility who were screened for depression. Logistic regression tested for associations between depression screen receipt and screening positive and demographic/clinical characteristics among patients with diabetes. Depression screening among those with diabetes improved from 62% in fiscal year 2001 to 83% in 2004. Screening was 9-23% lower and 11-22% lower in patients with diabetes compared with the general population of veterans nationwide and patients at the Midwestern facility, respectively. Seventeen percent of subjects with diabetes screened positive, which is two times higher than in the general population. Women (odds ratio 0.45 [95% CI 0.35-0.60]) and subjects with unknown A1C (0.40 [0.34-0.46]) were less likely to be screened for depression. A >or=50% service-connected disability rating was inversely associated with screening (0.84 [0.72-0.99]) but positively associated with screening positive for depression (1.56 [1.33-1.82]). Screening for depression among veterans with diabetes improved 21% but is considerably lower than the proportion of general population veterans screened nationally and at the facility of interest. Targeted interventions to improve screening in patients with diabetes are required based on evidence that screening translates into increased provider recognition and treatment of depression.
    Diabetes care 09/2007; 30(9):2216-21. DOI:10.2337/dc07-0350 · 8.57 Impact Factor
Show more