Article

Universal scaling of respiratory metabolism, size and nitrogen in plants

Department of Biology, Swarthmore College, Swarthmore, Pennsylvania, United States
Nature (Impact Factor: 42.35). 02/2006; 439(7075):457-61. DOI: 10.1038/nature04282
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The scaling of respiratory metabolism to body size in animals is considered to be a fundamental law of nature, and there is substantial evidence for an approximate (3/4)-power relation. Studies suggest that plant respiratory metabolism also scales as the (3/4)-power of mass, and that higher plant and animal scaling follow similar rules owing to the predominance of fractal-like transport networks and associated allometric scaling. Here, however, using data obtained from about 500 laboratory and field-grown plants from 43 species and four experiments, we show that whole-plant respiration rate scales approximately isometrically (scaling exponent approximately 1) with total plant mass in individual experiments and has no common relation across all data. Moreover, consistent with theories about biochemically based physiological scaling, isometric scaling of whole-plant respiration rate to total nitrogen content is observed within and across all data sets, with a single relation common to all data. This isometric scaling is unaffected by growth conditions including variation in light, nitrogen availability, temperature and atmospheric CO2 concentration, and is similar within or among species or functional groups. These findings suggest that plants and animals follow different metabolic scaling relations, driven by distinct mechanisms.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Mark Tjoelker, Aug 30, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
160 Views
  • Source
    • "Alternative explanations that are inconsistent with quarter-power scaling involve the influence of nutrient and/or water relations on coupled carbon, nutrient, and water scaling (e.g. Reich et al., 2006; Savage et al., 2010). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We compiled a global database for leaf, stem and root biomass representing c. 11 000 records for c. 1200 herbaceous and woody species grown under either controlled or field conditions. We used this data set to analyse allometric relationships and fractional biomass distribution to leaves, stems and roots. We tested whether allometric scaling exponents are generally constant across plant sizes as predicted by metabolic scaling theory, or whether instead they change dynamically with plant size. We also quantified interspecific variation in biomass distribution among plant families and functional groups. Across all species combined, leaf vs stem and leaf vs root scaling exponents decreased from c. 1.00 for small plants to c. 0.60 for the largest trees considered. Evergreens had substantially higher leaf mass fractions (LMFs) than deciduous species, whereas graminoids maintained higher root mass fractions (RMFs) than eudicotyledonous herbs. These patterns do not support the hypothesis of fixed allometric exponents. Rather, continuous shifts in allometric exponents with plant size during ontogeny and evolution are the norm. Across seed plants, variation in biomass distribution among species is related more to function than phylogeny. We propose that the higher LMF of evergreens at least partly compensates for their relatively low leaf area : leaf mass ratio. © 2015 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2015 New Phytologist Trust.
    New Phytologist 07/2015; DOI:10.1111/nph.13571 · 7.67 Impact Factor
    • "Under a simpler, geometric similarity model (Galilei 1638; Niklas 1994) in which leaf number and mass are assumed proportional to the surface area of an idealized geometric shape, a2 is predicted to be 2/3. The models generating these predictions have been tested across taxonomically diverse communities, but remain contentious (Reich et al. 2006; Enquist et al. 2007; Price et al. 2009). At the whole plant scale, studies have reported both positive and negative relationships between wood density and plant size (Niklas 1995; Falster & Westoby 2005; Aiba & Nakashizuka 2009). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: 1.Recent studies have reported a consistent tradeoff between leaf size (mass) and leafing intensity (the number of leaves produced per unit of supporting stem tissue volume), however, a theoretical basis for this tradeoff has not been described.2.We explore the mechanistic basis for this tradeoff and assess the relationship in light of other prominent theories for allometric biomass partitioning. We show algebraically how the allocation of mass to leaves versus stems and the density of stem tissue can potentially influence this tradeoff. To assess these possible effects, we compared the relationship between leaf size and leafing intensity, expressed on both mass and volume basis, at the level of a single branch as well as the entire above-ground plant in 61 forbs over a 3-year period.3.Our results support the idea that the tradeoff between leaf size and volume-based leafing intensity depends on both biomass investment (leaves vs. stems) and stem bulk density (mass vs. volume), whereas the tradeoff between leaf size and mass-based leafing intensity only depends on the biomass investment. Similar exponents in the scaling of leaf mass vs. stem mass and stem mass vs. stem volume at branch- and whole plant-level lead to similar tradeoffs. An isometric tradeoff between leaf size and volume-based leafing intensity is consistent with a constant biomass partitioning between leaves and stems as well as constant stem tissue density. Conversely, an allometric tradeoff between leaf size and volume-based leafing intensity arises when biomass allocation is allometric and stem bulk density varies with plant size.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
    Functional Ecology 06/2015; DOI:10.1111/1365-2435.12491 · 4.86 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "There is growing acceptance, however, that leaf R dark is not adequately represented in TBMs and ESMs (Huntingford et al., 2013; Smith & Dukes, 2013), resulting in substantial uncertainty in future climate predictions (Leuzinger & Thomas, 2011); consequently, there is a need to improve representation of leaf R dark in predictions of future vegetation–climate interactions for a range of possible fossil fuel-burning scenarios (Atkin et al., 2014). Achieving this requires an analysis of variation in leaf R dark along global climate gradients and among taxa within ecosystems; and establishing whether relationships between leaf R dark and associated leaf traits vary predictably among environments and PFTs (Wright et al., 2004, 2006; Reich et al., 2006; Atkin et al., 2008). PFTs enable a balance to be struck between the computational requirements of TBMs to minimize the number of plant groups and availability of sufficient data to fully characterize functional types, and the reality that plant species differ widely in trait values. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Leaf dark respiration (Rdark ) is an important yet poorly quantified component of the global carbon cycle. Given this, we analyzed a new global database of Rdark and associated leaf traits. Data for 899 species were compiled from 100 sites (from the Arctic to the tropics). Several woody and nonwoody plant functional types (PFTs) were represented. Mixed-effects models were used to disentangle sources of variation in Rdark . Area-based Rdark at the prevailing average daily growth temperature (T) of each site increased only twofold from the Arctic to thetropics, despite a 20°C increase in growing T (8-28°C). By contrast, Rdark at a standard T (25°C, Rdark (25) ) was threefold higher in the Arctic than in the tropics, and twofold higher at arid than at mesic sites. Species and PFTs at cold sites exhibited higher Rdark (25) at a given photosynthetic capacity (Vcmax (25) ) or leaf nitrogen concentration ([N]) than species at warmer sites. Rdark (25) values at any given Vcmax (25) or [N] were higher in herbs than in woody plants. The results highlight variation in Rdark among species and across global gradients in T and aridity. In addition to their ecological significance, the results provide a framework for improving representation of Rdark in terrestrial biosphere models (TBMs) and associated land-surface components of Earth system models (ESMs). © 2015 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2015 New Phytologist Trust.
    New Phytologist 01/2015; 206(2). DOI:10.1111/nph.13253 · 7.67 Impact Factor
Show more