Article

Comparison of AIMS2-SF, WOMAC, x-ray and a global physician assessment in order to approach quality of life in patients suffering from osteoarthritis

Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University of Heidelberg, 69115 Heidelberg, Germany.
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders (Impact Factor: 1.9). 02/2006; 7:6. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-7-6
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Chronic diseases like osteoarthritis (OA) substantially affect different dimensions of quality of life (QoL). The aim of the study was to reveal possible factors which mainly influence general practitioners (GPs) assessment of patients' QoL.
220 primary care patients with OA of the knee or the hip treated by their general practitioner for at least one year were included. All GPs were asked to assess patients' QoL based on the patients' history, actual examination and existing x-rays by means of a visual analog scale (VAS scale), resulting in values ranging from 0 to 10. Patients were asked to complete the McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scale2 Short Form (AIMS2-SF) questionnaire.
Significant correlations were revealed between "GP assessment" and the AIMS2-SF scales "physical" (rho = 0.495) and "symptom" (rho = 0.598) as well as to the "pain" scale of the WOMAC (rho = 0.557). A multivariate ordinal regression analysis revealed only the AIMS2-SF "symptom" scale (coefficient beta = 0.2588; p = 0.0267) and the x-ray grading according to Kellgren and Lawrence as significant influence variables (beta = 0.6395; p = 0.0004).
The results of the present study suggest that physicians' assessment of patients' QoL is mainly dominated by physical factors, namely pain and severity of x-ray findings. Our results suggest that socioeconomic and psychosocial factors, which are known to have substantial impact on QoL, are underestimated or missed. Moreover, the overestimation of x-ray findings, which are known to be less correlated to QoL, may cause over-treatment while important and promising targets to increase patients' QoL are missed.

0 Followers
 · 
87 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study aims to evaluate the correlations between common clinical osteoarthritis (OA) diagnostic tools in order to determine the value of each. A secondary goal was to investigate the influence of gender differences on the findings. Five hundred and eighteen patients with knee OA were evaluated using the Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) questionnaire, short form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey, and plain radiographs. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the different domains of the WOMAC and SF-36 questionnaires between genders and the radiographic scale. Higher knee OA x-ray grade were associated with worse clinical outcome: for women, higher scores for the WOMAC pain, function and final scores and lower scores in the SF-36 final score; in men, lower SF-36 overall and physical domains scores. Gender differences were found in all clinical scores that were tested, with women having worse clinical scores for similar radiographic grading (p values <0.001). Knee radiographs for OA have an important role in the clinical evaluation of the patient. Patients with higher levels of knee OA in x-ray have a higher probability of having a worse clinical score in the WOMAC and SF-36 scores. The gender differences suggest that for similar knee OA x-ray grade, women's clinical scores are lower.Trial registration: NCT00767780.
    Clinical Rheumatology 01/2015; DOI:10.1007/s10067-015-2871-8 · 1.77 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Pain is the primary outcome measurement in osteoarthritis, and its assessment is mostly based on its intensity. The management of this difficult chronic condition could be improved by using pain descriptors to improve analyses of painful sensations. This should help to define subgroups of patients based on pain phenotype, for more adapted treatment. This study draws upon patients' descriptions of their pain, to identify and understand their perception of osteoarthritis pain and to categorize pain dimensions. This qualitative study was conducted with representative types of patients suffering from osteoarthritis. Two focus groups were conducted with a sample of 14 participants, with either recent or chronic OA, at one or multiple sites. Focus groups were semi-structured and used open-ended questions addressing personal experiences to explore the experiences of patients with OA pain and the meanings they attributed to these pains. TWO MAIN POINTS EMERGED FROM CONTENT ANALYSES: -A major difficulty in getting patients to describe their osteoarthritis pain: perception that nobody wants to hear about it; necessity to preserve one's self and social image; notion of self-imposed stoicism; and perception of osteoarthritis as a complex, changing, illogical disease associated with aging. -Osteoarthritis pains were numerous and differed in intensity, duration, depth, type of occurrence, impact and rhythm, but also in painful sensations and associated symptoms. Based on analyses of the verbatim interviews, seven dimensions of OA pain emerged: pain sensory description, OA-related symptoms, pain variability profile, pain-triggering factors, pain and physical activity, mood and image, general physical symptoms. In osteoarthritis, pain analysis should not be restricted to intensity. Our qualitative study identified pain descriptors and defined seven dimensions of osteoarthritis pain. Based on these dimensions, we aim to develop a specific questionnaire on osteoarthritis pain quality for osteoarthritis pain phenotyping: the OsteoArthritis Symptom Inventory Scale (OASIS).
    PLoS ONE 11/2013; 8(11):e79988. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0079988 · 3.53 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Japanese Orthopaedic Association hip disease evaluation questionnaire (JHEQ) was developed to evaluate the quality of life (QOL) in patients with hip disease. This questionnaire consists of three subscales: pain; movement; and mental. The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability and validity of the JHEQ for use as a clinical evaluation tool. We investigated patients who visited the outpatient department at our hospital and affiliated hospital between April and May 2010. The study population comprised 286 patients (239 women) with a mean age of 56.8 years. The diagnosis was osteoarthritis of the hip in 230 patients, avascular osteonecrosis of the femoral head in 49 patients, and other conditions in 7 patients. The JHEQ questionnaire, the SF-36 questionnaire as a generic QOL scale, and the Oxford hip score (OHS) as a disease-specific scale, were filled out by the patient while waiting in the outpatient department. Pearson's correlation coefficients of 0.6 were observed between JHEQ pain and SF-36 bodily pain (BP) subscales, and between JHEQ movement and SF-36 physical functioning (PF) subscales. The JHEQ mental subscale correlated with SF-36 social functioning (SF) and BP subscales. A strong negative correlation was seen between JHEQ pain and OHS pain subscales (r = -0.817). JHEQ movement subscale also showed a strong negative correlation with the OHS function subscale (r = -0.715). These results indicated the convergent validity of JHEQ. The internal consistency of pain, movement, and mental subscales of JHEQ was satisfactory, indicated by Cronbach's α coefficients of 0.92, 0.91, and 0.94, respectively. Each subscale also showed high test-retest reliability with intra-class correlation coefficients of 0.89, 0.93, and 0.85, respectively. We determined the reliability and validity of JHEQ as a self-administered questionnaire that evaluates hip disease. JHEQ is useful as a tool for evaluating patients with hip disease.
    Journal of Orthopaedic Science 07/2013; 18(5). DOI:10.1007/s00776-013-0436-8 · 1.01 Impact Factor

Full-text (3 Sources)

Download
16 Downloads
Available from
May 16, 2014