Article

Comparison of AIMS2-SF, WOMAC, x-ray and a global physician assessment in order to approach quality of life in patients suffering from osteoarthritis

Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University of Heidelberg, 69115 Heidelberg, Germany.
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders (Impact Factor: 1.9). 02/2006; 7:6. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-7-6
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Chronic diseases like osteoarthritis (OA) substantially affect different dimensions of quality of life (QoL). The aim of the study was to reveal possible factors which mainly influence general practitioners (GPs) assessment of patients' QoL.
220 primary care patients with OA of the knee or the hip treated by their general practitioner for at least one year were included. All GPs were asked to assess patients' QoL based on the patients' history, actual examination and existing x-rays by means of a visual analog scale (VAS scale), resulting in values ranging from 0 to 10. Patients were asked to complete the McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scale2 Short Form (AIMS2-SF) questionnaire.
Significant correlations were revealed between "GP assessment" and the AIMS2-SF scales "physical" (rho = 0.495) and "symptom" (rho = 0.598) as well as to the "pain" scale of the WOMAC (rho = 0.557). A multivariate ordinal regression analysis revealed only the AIMS2-SF "symptom" scale (coefficient beta = 0.2588; p = 0.0267) and the x-ray grading according to Kellgren and Lawrence as significant influence variables (beta = 0.6395; p = 0.0004).
The results of the present study suggest that physicians' assessment of patients' QoL is mainly dominated by physical factors, namely pain and severity of x-ray findings. Our results suggest that socioeconomic and psychosocial factors, which are known to have substantial impact on QoL, are underestimated or missed. Moreover, the overestimation of x-ray findings, which are known to be less correlated to QoL, may cause over-treatment while important and promising targets to increase patients' QoL are missed.

0 Followers
 · 
92 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Osteoarthritis (OA) has a high prevalence in primary care. Patient satisfaction is an important indicator for the quality of care provided to OA patients. Little is known about satisfaction of patients with this condition in a primary care setting in Germany. The aim of the study was to assess current satisfaction of patients and reveal possible disease and quality of life related predictors. Seventy-five German GPs approached 1250 patients with OA consecutively. Sociodemographics, OA-specific quality of life (GERMAN-AIMS2-SF), co-morbidities and depression (using PHQ-9) were assessed. Patient satisfaction was measured by means of the European Task Force on Patient Evaluations of General Practice (EUROPEP) instrument. A stepwise linear regression analysis with the EUROPEP score as dependent variable controlled for the amount of GP visits was performed to assess predictors of satisfaction. A total of 1021 OA patients returned the questionnaire. The adjusted R(2) of the final model was 0.270 (P < 0.001). The main predictors were the PHQ-9 score (beta = -0.372; P < 0.001), age (beta = -0.185; P < 0.001), living alone (beta = -0.209; P < 0.001) and number of co-morbidities (beta = -0.152; P < 0.001). The only disease-related factor which remained as predictor of patient satisfaction was duration of OA (beta = -0.105; P = 0.008). The finding that depression and social factors are more important for patient satisfaction with provided care than disease-related aspects suggests that these factors need to be considered carefully in treatment. This represents a big challenge within an increasingly specialized health care system. The General Practitioner as the regular and first-choice provider of health care seems to be the most appropriate instance who can accomplish this.
    Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 04/2009; 15(3):486-91. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.01047.x · 1.58 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Chronic Care Model (CCM) and the 5A approach have achieved widespread acceptance and reflect the core elements of patient-centred care in chronic diseases, including osteoarthritis (OA). The aim was to assess to what extent current care for patients with osteoarthritis accords with the CCM in Germany and to reveal possible predictors to assess whether certain patients are more likely to receive care complying with the CCM than others. Cross-sectional observational study, addressing 1250 patients from 75 primary care practices in Germany. 1021 (81.7%) of the administered 1250 questionnaires were returned. The Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC-5A) was used to assess accordance to the CCM and the 5A-approach. The impact of OA was assessed by means of the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scale (AIMS2-SF); the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) was used to assess depression symptoms. Two stepwise multiple linear regression models with the PACIC sum score and the 5A score as dependents were performed to reveal predictors of a high accordance to the CCM and to the 5A approach, respectively. With a mean (SD) of 2.79 (0.83) in men and 2.67 (0.89) in women (p for difference = 0.89), the PACIC sum score was notably lower than in previous studies conducted in health maintenance organisation settings in the US. The PACIC score was associated with a higher educational level (beta = 0.421; p = 0.008) and younger age (beta = -0.319; p = 0.016); the 5A score was predicted by educational level (beta = 0.344; p = 0.002), age (beta = -0.386; p = 0.004) and the PHQ-9 score (beta = -0.288; p = 0.005). Younger and better educated patients achieve higher scores on the PACIC score, indicating that their care accords to a higher degree with the CCM. Whether this reflects differences in physician behaviour toward different patient groups or rather different demands of these patient groups cannot be concluded from the presented data. Further research is needed to confirm our results and assess possible implications for implementing the Chronic Care Model in primary care.
    Quality and Safety in Health Care 01/2009; 17(6):442-6. DOI:10.1136/qshc.2007.022822 · 2.16 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Pain is the primary outcome measurement in osteoarthritis, and its assessment is mostly based on its intensity. The management of this difficult chronic condition could be improved by using pain descriptors to improve analyses of painful sensations. This should help to define subgroups of patients based on pain phenotype, for more adapted treatment. This study draws upon patients' descriptions of their pain, to identify and understand their perception of osteoarthritis pain and to categorize pain dimensions. This qualitative study was conducted with representative types of patients suffering from osteoarthritis. Two focus groups were conducted with a sample of 14 participants, with either recent or chronic OA, at one or multiple sites. Focus groups were semi-structured and used open-ended questions addressing personal experiences to explore the experiences of patients with OA pain and the meanings they attributed to these pains. TWO MAIN POINTS EMERGED FROM CONTENT ANALYSES: -A major difficulty in getting patients to describe their osteoarthritis pain: perception that nobody wants to hear about it; necessity to preserve one's self and social image; notion of self-imposed stoicism; and perception of osteoarthritis as a complex, changing, illogical disease associated with aging. -Osteoarthritis pains were numerous and differed in intensity, duration, depth, type of occurrence, impact and rhythm, but also in painful sensations and associated symptoms. Based on analyses of the verbatim interviews, seven dimensions of OA pain emerged: pain sensory description, OA-related symptoms, pain variability profile, pain-triggering factors, pain and physical activity, mood and image, general physical symptoms. In osteoarthritis, pain analysis should not be restricted to intensity. Our qualitative study identified pain descriptors and defined seven dimensions of osteoarthritis pain. Based on these dimensions, we aim to develop a specific questionnaire on osteoarthritis pain quality for osteoarthritis pain phenotyping: the OsteoArthritis Symptom Inventory Scale (OASIS).
    PLoS ONE 11/2013; 8(11):e79988. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0079988 · 3.53 Impact Factor