Empirical evidence for symbiotic medical education: a comparative analysis of community and tertiary-based programmes

Flinders University Rural Clinical School, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Medical Education (Impact Factor: 3.62). 03/2006; 40(2):109-16. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02366.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Flinders University has developed the Parallel Rural Community Curriculum (PRCC), a full year clinical curriculum based in rural general practice in South Australia. The examination performance of students on this course has been shown to be higher than that of their tertiary hospital-based peers.
To compare the learning experiences of students in the community-based programme with those of students in the tertiary hospital in order to explain these improved academic outcomes.
A case study was undertaken, using an interpretivist perspective, with 3 structured interviews carried out over 2 academic years with each of 6 students from the community-based programme and 16 students from the tertiary hospital. The taped interviews were transcribed and analysed thematically using NUD*IST software.
The community-based programme was successful in immersing the students in the clinical environment in a meaningful way. Four key themes were found in the data. These represented clear differences between the experiences of the community-based and hospital-based students. These differences involved: the value that students perceived they were given by supervising doctors and their patients; the extent to which the student's presence realised a synergy between the work of the university and the health service; opportunities for students to meet the aspirations of both the community and government policy, and opportunities for students to learn how professional expectations can mesh with their own personal values.
This study has provided empirical evidence for the importance of the concept of symbiosis in understanding quality in medical education.

Download full-text


Available from: Roger Strasser, Jul 01, 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Traditionally, clinical learning for medical students consists of short-term and opportunistic encounters with primarily acute-care patients, supervised by an array of clinician preceptors. In response to educational concerns, some medical schools have developed longitudinal placements rather than short-term rotations. Many of these longitudinal placements are also integrated across the core clinical disciplines, are commonly termed longitudinal integrated clerkships (LICs) and often situated in rural locations. This review aimed to explore, analyse and synthesise evidence relating to the effectiveness of longitudinal placements, for medical students in particular to determine which aspects are most critical to successful outcomes. Method: Extensive search of the literature resulted in 1679 papers and abstracts being considered, with 53 papers ultimately being included for review. The review group coded these 53 papers according to standard BEME review guidelines. Specific information extracted included: data relating to effectiveness, the location of the study, number of students involved, format, length and description of placement, the learning outcomes, research design, the impact level for evaluation and the main evaluation methods and findings. We applied a realist approach to consider what works well for whom and under what circumstances. Findings: The early LICs were all community-based immersion programs, situated in general practice and predominantly in rural settings. More recent LIC innovations were situated in tertiary-level specialist ambulatory care in urban settings. Not all placements were integrated across medical disciplines but were longitudinal in relation to location, patient base and/or supervision. Twenty-four papers focussed on one of four programs from different viewpoints. Most evaluations were student opinion (survey, interview, focus group) and/or student assessment results. Placements varied from one half day per week for six months through to full time immersion for more than 12 months. The predominant mechanism relating to factors influencing effectiveness was continuity of one or more of: patient care, supervision and mentorship, peer group and location. The success of LICs and participation satisfaction depended on the preparation of both students and clinical supervisors, and the level of support each received from their academic institutions. Conclusion: Longitudinal placements, including longitudinal integrated placements, are gaining in popularity as an alternative to traditional block rotations. Although relatively few established LICs currently exist, medical schools may look for ways to incorporate some of the principles of LICs more generally in their clinical education programmes. Further research is required to ascertain the optimum length of time for placements depending on the defined learning outcomes and timing within the programme, which students are most likely to benefit and the effects of context such as location and type of integration.
    Medical Teacher 07/2013; 35(8). DOI:10.3109/0142159X.2013.806981 · 2.05 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Recent studies indicate that students may encounter problems when they have to apply clinical skills learned in a skills laboratory to patients. To facilitate this transition, it has been advised to include patient contacts early in the pre-clinical curriculum. To compare clinical skills performance and level of preparedness for entering the clerkships between students who were prepared exclusively in a skills laboratory and peers for whom part of their skills training program was substituted by training in a primary health care (PHC) center. Pre-clinical students either trained clinical skills exclusively in a skills laboratory while their peers attended a mixed program of laboratory trainings and practice in PHC centers. Students' perception of preparedness for the clerkships was explored through the Preparation for Hospital Practice Questionnaire. Students' clinical skills were assessed by an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) and by supervisors in PHC centers. Students following the mixed program felt better prepared for their clerkships than skills lab-trained peers. Students' perceptions were supported by assessments by their supervisors. However, mean OSCE scores of both groups did not differ significantly. PHC centers can be involved to better prepare pre-clinical students for their clerkships.
    Medical Teacher 06/2011; 33(6):e313-7. DOI:10.3109/0142159X.2011.565829 · 2.05 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Thesis (M.S.)--Cornell University, May, 2007. Includes bibliographical references.