Inequality in the built environment underlies key health disparities in physical activity and obesity

Department of Nutrition, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
PEDIATRICS (Impact Factor: 5.3). 02/2006; 117(2):417-24. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2005-0058
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Environmental factors are suggested to play a major role in physical activity (PA) and other obesity-related behaviors, yet there is no national research on the relationship between disparity in access to recreational facilities and additional impact on PA and overweight patterns in US adolescents.
In a nationally representative cohort, we sought to assess the geographic and social distribution of PA facilities and how disparity in access might underlie population-level PA and overweight patterns.
Residential locations of US adolescents in wave I (1994-1995) of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (N = 20745) were geocoded, and a 8.05-km buffer around each residence was drawn (N = 42857 census-block groups [19% of US block groups]). PA facilities, measured by national databases and satellite data, were linked with Geographic Information Systems technology to each respondent. Logistic-regression analyses tested the relationship of PA-related facilities with block-group socioeconomic status (SES) (at the community level) and the subsequent association of facilities with overweight and PA (at the individual level), controlling for population density.
Outcome measures were overweight (BMI > or = 95th percentile of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/National Center for Health Statistics growth curves) and achievement of > or = 5 bouts per week of moderate-vigorous PA.
Higher-SES block groups had a significantly greater relative odds of having 1 or more facilities. Low-SES and high-minority block groups were less likely to have facilities. Relative to zero facilities per block group, an increasing number of facilities was associated with decreased overweight and increased relative odds of achieving > or = 5 bouts per week of moderate-vigorous PA.
Lower-SES and high-minority block groups had reduced access to facilities, which in turn was associated with decreased PA and increased overweight. Inequality in availability of PA facilities may contribute to ethnic and SES disparities in PA and overweight patterns.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Optimal sleep is integral to health but is commonly not obtained. Despite its wide-ranging public health impact, sleep health is considered only rarely by policy makers, employers, schools, and others whose policies and structures can adversely affect sleep. An inadequate duration of sleep and poor-quality sleep are prevalent in minority and low-income populations, and may be fundamental to racial and socioeconomic status inequities that contribute to a range of health conditions, including cardiovascular disease (CVD). This review examines the relationship between sleep and disparities in CVD. We describe the public health importance of sleep and the role of sleep duration, as well as the two most common disorders (sleep apnea and insomnia) as risk factors for a number of chronic diseases. We use a multilevel model focused on population health and health disparities, which is based on the notion that individual behaviors, such as sleep, are influenced by complex and dynamic interrelations among individuals and their physical and social environments. We also describe modifiable factors that contribute to insufficient sleep and circadian misalignment, propose potential interventions in various sectors (e.g., neighborhoods, schools, workplaces) that can address social structures that contribute to disparities, and recommend areas for future research. Integrating sleep into public health research will identify novel approaches for closing gaps in health disparities.
    Annual Review of Public Health 03/2015; 36:417-40. DOI:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031914-122838 · 6.63 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this paper I explore the nature of economic inequality in the United States and its implications for the delivery of park and recreation resources to poorer Americans. The first part of this paper shows that economic wealth and poverty are increasingly concentrated, resulting in persistent poverty among segments of the U.S. population. Growing economic inequality over the last 35 years is linked to the weakening of trade unions, the loss of high paying manufacturing jobs, declining tax rates levied on wealthy Americans, the erosion of unemployment benefits and public spending on social services, the loss of public sector jobs, and a scaling back of progressive government policies that have historically benefited poorer Americans. Growing economic inequality has led to the rise of an underclass, primarily minority, which is stuck in poverty. In the second part of the paper I present six ideas about how to better serve poorer Americans. Public parks and recreation leaders are encouraged first to develop positive relationships with influential allies when advocating for improved leisure service delivery. A related strategy is to work with allies to improve accessibility of park and recreation resources. Redressing access inequities may be couched as environmental justice and civil rights issues. A third strategy is to offer leisure education programs that include basic instruction associated with different recreation activities. They key here is provide poorer Americans formative experience in leisure activities; many of these experiences are taken for granted by more affluent Americans. Another tactic is to increase safety so that poorer Americans are more likely to access parks and community facilities. A fifth course of action is to ensure poorer Americans are made to feel welcome when visiting recreation areas. Principles of inclusion must permeate all levels of the organization so that every citizen feels welcome. A final and obvious consideration in these economically challenging times is to make services affordable.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Research on the association between the physical environment and physical activity in children has focused on built and developed features or total green space. The impact of natural, undeveloped green spaces is unknown. The objective of this study was to determine whether the presence of undeveloped green spaces in the home neighborhood are associated with physical activity in 11 to 13-year-olds. This was a cross-sectional study of grade 6 to 8 urban residing Canadian students who participated in the 2009/10 Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children survey. Children self-reported the frequency they participated in physical activity in their free-time outside of school hours. Geographic Information Systems (GIS) were used to assess the proportion of land area within 1 km of participants' homes that was devoted to publicly accessible meadows (i.e., field vegetated primarily by grass and other non-woody plants) and treed areas (i.e., field vegetated primarily by trees and shrubs). Ordinal logistic regression models were used to examine the relationships between the undeveloped green space areas and free-time physical activity. Several intrapersonal, family, and neighborhood environment factors were controlled for in these regression models. The proportion of neighborhood land covered by meadows was not associated with the physical activity outcome (p > 0.6). However, the proportion of neighborhood land covered by treed areas was independently associated with the physical activity outcome (p = 0.02). For each additional 5% increase in the proportion of neighborhood land covered by treed areas there was a corresponding 5% increase (95% confidence interval: 1-10% increase) in the relative odds of increasing free-time physical activity outside of school hours. The physical activity levels of 11 to 13-year-old children was associated with the amount of space in their home neighborhood devoted to treed areas.
    International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 12/2015; 12(1). DOI:10.1186/s12966-015-0187-3 · 3.68 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Jan 27, 2015