Article

Prolonging contact lens wear and making contact lens wear safer

University of Louisville, School of Medicine, Louisville, Kentucky 40202, USA.
American Journal of Ophthalmology (Impact Factor: 4.02). 03/2006; 141(2):369-373. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2005.08.047
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To summarize the present status of safety and efficacy of contact lens wear.
Literature review.
Ovid Medline searches were performed on records from 1966 through 2005 using keywords: keratitis, contact lens complications, extended-wear contact lenses, and silicone-hydrogel contact lenses.
Patients desire comfort, clarity of vision, and prolonged contact lens wear when contact lenses are used to correct refractive error. Practitioners desire patient satisfaction but also require maintenance of the integrity of the eye and no complications that jeopardize vision or health of the eye. Improvements in the oxygen permeability of the contact lens materials, design of the contact lens and its surface, and solutions for the maintenance of the lens have reduced but not eliminated the risks of infection, inflammation, and conjunctival papillary reaction associated with contact lens wear. The lessons of past and recent history suggest that patient education and practitioner participation in the management of contact lens wear continue to be critical factors for patient satisfaction and safety in the extended wear of contact lenses.
The availability of highly oxygen permeable contact lenses has increased the tolerance and safety of extended contact lens wear, but patient instruction and education in proper use and care of lenses is required and caution is advised.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
82 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To examine the types of contact lenses used as bandage lenses in the postoperative management of patients with Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis (K-Pro). We examined the lens parameters, the number of trial lenses used to achieve successful fit, and lens replacement schedule. The strategies to achieving a successful fit in these complex patients are reviewed. This was a single-center, retrospective chart review of patients who had undergone implantation of the Boston keratoprosthesis in 1 or more eyes from January 2006 to December 2011. Patients included male and female subjects aged 18 years or older who had been fit with bandage contact lenses as part of their postoperative management. Twenty-two eyes of 15 patients met the criteria for this review. The age range was 30 to 90 years. There were eight men and seven women. The average number of lenses to achieve a successful fit varied from 1 to 8, with an average of 2.22 trial lenses used per patient. By 6 months after the surgery, 12 K-Pro eyes showed visual acuity of 20/200 or better, with 7 of those eyes attaining better than 20/80 best-corrected Snellen distance acuity. Our results show that it is often necessary to use custom contact lenses for K-Pro patients. Management of poor tear film quality, protein deposition, inflammation, lens replacement schedule, and antibiotic resistance are related considerations.
    Eye & contact lens 02/2014; DOI:10.1097/ICL.0000000000000021 · 1.68 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this study, high oxygen permeable transparent hybrid copolymers were prepared with hydrophilic monomer such as 2-hydroxyethylmethacrylate (HEMA) or N,N-dimethylacrylamide (DMAA) and mono- or difunctional silicone macro-monomer introduced methacryl groups. In HEMA-based hybrid copolymers, difunctional silicone macro-monomer and ethylene glycol dimethacrylate (EGDMA) as cross-linker were required in order to prepare transparent hybrid materials, while high transparent DMAA-based hybrid copolymers could be prepared without EGDMA cross-linker. The polymerization kinetics investigation revealed that this difference between HEMA and DMAA in preparation condition to transparent hybrid material originated to monomer reactivity in copolymerization and DMAA showed high reactivity compared with HEMA. Moreover, DMAA-based hybrid copolymers indicated high water content and high oxygen permeability as against HEMA-based hybrid copolymers because of its low cross-linking density.
    Colloid and Polymer Science 01/2011; 290(2). DOI:10.1007/s00396-011-2538-1 · 2.41 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of two silicone hydrogel (SiH) contact lenses, approved for continuous wear for one week, following photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). METHODS: Forty seven myopic patients (94 eyes) undergone bilateral PRK were enrolled in this prospective, double-masked, comparative study. One eye of each patient was fitted with a Lotrafilcon B lens (Ciba Vision, Duluth, US; 30-day recommended replacement) whereas the fellow eye was fitted with an Asmofilcon A lens (Menicon, Nagoya, Japan; 14-day recommended replacement). Epithelial defect size was assessed using slit lamp biomicroscopy on the day of surgery and at days 1-4 post-operatively. Uncorrected and best-corrected visual acuity and retinal straylight (C-Quant, Oculus Optigerate, Germany) were evaluated pre-operatively and one month post-operatively. RESULTS: Average epithelial defect size for Asmofilcon A and Lotrafilcon B was 25.5±11.0mm(2) vs. 27.1±9.9mm(2) at day 1 (p=0.007) and 6.3±7.0mm(2) vs. 9.2±9.5mm(2) at day 2 (p=0.012) post-operatively. Re-epithelialization at day 3 was completed in 87.2% of the eyes fitted with Asmofilcon A lenses, compared to 74.5% with Lotrafilcon B lenses (p=0.012). At the 3rd post-operative day 29.8% of re-epithelialized eyes showed irregular suture with Lotrafilcon B, compared to 12.8% eyes with Asmofilcon A lenses (p<0.001). Finally, no statistically significant differences were found post-operatively between the two lenses retinal straylight (p=0.98) and best-corrected visual acuity (p=0.68). CONCLUSIONS: SiH lenses can be used as an effective bandage after PRK due to the limited time requested for achieving complete corneal re-epithelialization. Faster and smoother epithelial healing is provided with Asmofilcon A over Lotrafilcon B lenses.
    Contact lens & anterior eye: the journal of the British Contact Lens Association 03/2013; 36(5). DOI:10.1016/j.clae.2013.02.015