Improving the Recognition and Management of Dementia in Long-term Care: Obstacles and Opportunities
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association (Impact Factor: 4.94). 03/2006; 7(2):128-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2005.10.002
- Journal of the American Medical Directors Association 02/2007; 8(1):65-7. DOI:10.1016/j.jamda.2006.10.003 · 4.94 Impact Factor
- Journal of the American Medical Directors Association 04/2008; 9(3):139-46. DOI:10.1016/j.jamda.2007.12.008 · 4.94 Impact Factor
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To test the accuracy of a brief cognitive assessment of nursing home (NH) residents and to determine whether facility nurses can reliably perform this assessment. Cross-sectional, independent cognitive screening tests with NH residents. Six Department of Veteran Affairs nursing facilities. Three hundred seventy-four residents from six regionally distributed Veteran Affairs NHs. Three cognitive assessment instruments: the Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS), created for this study; the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 2.0 Cognitive Performance Scale (CPS), and the Modified Mini-Mental State Examination (3MS) as the criterion standard. The 15-point BIMS tests memory and orientation and includes free and cued recall items. Research assistants administered the 3MS and BIMS to all subjects. Facility nurses administered the same BIMS to a subsample. Three hundred seventy-four of 417 (89.7%) residents approached completed the 3MS and research assistant-administered BIMS (BIMS-R); 212 residents also received a facility nurse-administered BIMS (BIMS-N). The BIMS-R was more highly correlated with the 3MS than was the CPS (Pearson correlation coefficient (r)=0.79 vs 0.62; P<.01 for difference). For the subset who received facility assessments, the BIMS-N was also more highly correlated with the 3MS (Pearson r=0.74 vs 0.65; P<.01 for difference). For any impairment (3MS<78), the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.86 for the BIMS, versus 0.77 for the CPS. For severe impairment (3MS<48) the AUC was 0.94, versus 0.85 for the CPS. In this population, a brief cognitive test is a more accurate approach to cognitive assessment than the current observational methods employed using the MDS 2.0.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 11/2008; 56(11):2069-75. DOI:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01944.x · 4.57 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.