Article

Auditory responses in cochlear implant users with and without GJB2 deafness.

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and the Molecular Genetics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
The Laryngoscope (Impact Factor: 1.98). 02/2006; 116(2):317-27. DOI: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000199401.26626.4b
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT It is reasonable to suppose that the pattern of sensorineural damage along the length of the cochlea depends on the etiology of a hearing loss (HL). In GJB2-related deafness, we hypothesize that gap junction deficits are uniformly distributed and will result in similar damage along the length of the cochlea as compared with non-GJB2 subjects. We assessed this by measuring patterns of neural activity and hearing from apical versus basal cochlear implant electrode regions.
This was a prospective, blind, controlled study.
Blood from 301 pediatric cochlear implant users was analyzed for mutations in GJB2 by direct sequencing. After exclusion of patients with monoallelic GJB2 mutations, associated syndromes, or risk factors for HL that were not congenital, 39 children with biallelic GJB2 mutations and 58 without GJB2 mutations were evaluated. Hearing was measured before implantation at frequencies ranging from 250 Hz to 8 kHz. After implantation, neural activity at the apical and basal ends of the implanted array was measured using electrically evoked compound action potentials of the auditory nerve (ECAPs) and evoked stapedius reflexes (ESRs).
GJB2 and non-GJB2 groups were not significantly different with respect to sex, age at implantation, duration of auditory deprivation, hearing aid use, duration of aided hearing, ear implanted, implant model, or depth of insertion (P>.05). Children with GJB2-related HL had greater similarities between low- and high-frequency residual hearing and between neural activity electrically evoked at apical and basal regions of the cochlea as compared with children with non-GJB2-related HL who demonstrated larger deficits in basal regions.
Results suggest more consistent spiral ganglion survival along the length of the cochlea in GJB2-related HL as compared with non-GJB2-related HL, which appears to involve a decreasing gradient of spiral ganglion survival from the apex to the base of the cochlea. Our findings support our premise that in GJB2-related HL, dysfunction of gap junctions likely occurs to a similar degree in the apical and basal regions of the cochlea. This knowledge might be used to customize implantable devices for patients with HL in the future.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
160 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We have explored both the benefits and detriments of providing electrical input through a cochlear implant in one ear to the auditory system of young children. A cochlear implant delivers electrical pulses to stimulate the auditory nerve, providing children who are deaf with access to sound. The goals of implantation are to restrict reorganization of the deprived immature auditory brain and promote development of hearing and spoken language. It is clear that limiting the duration of deprivation is a key factor. Additional considerations are the onset, etiology, and use of residual hearing as each of these can have unique effects on auditory development in the pre-implant period. New findings show that many children receiving unilateral cochlear implants are developing mature-like brainstem and thalamo-cortical responses to sound with long term use despite these sources of variability; however, there remain considerable abnormalities in cortical function. The most apparent, determined by implanting the other ear and measuring responses to acute stimulation, is a loss of normal cortical response from the deprived ear. Recent data reveal that this can be avoided in children by early implantation of both ears simultaneously or with limited delay. We conclude that auditory development requires input early in development and from both ears.
    Frontiers in Psychology 01/2013; 4:719. · 2.80 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To determine whether a change in cochlear implant technology and electrode array design affects electrophysiological, behavioral, and functional measures of audition in pediatric cochlear implant users. Prospective nonrandomized control study over 6 months postimplantation. Tertiary referral pediatric hospital. A total of 115 children using unilateral cochlear implants were included in this study. Subjects were divided into 3 groups: 1) 38 using the Nucleus 24M straight array device, 2) 20 using the perimodiolar Nucleus 24RCS Contour array, and 3) 57 using the perimodiolar Nucleus 24RE array with advance off stylet insertion. The mean ages at implantation were 4.85 +/- 4 (24M), 3.88 +/- 3.4 (24RCS), and 5.41 +/- 4.36 years (24RE; not significant, p > 0.05). The electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) and the electrically evoked stapedius reflex and behavioral measures of stimulation threshold were evoked by stimulation of basal, mid, and apical electrodes. These measures were completed at regular intervals over 6 to 12 months of implantation. Age-appropriate speech perception skills were also assessed during this period. The 24RE array group had significantly lower ECAP and behavioral thresholds compared with the 24M and 24RCS array groups. The largest reductions of ECAP thresholds in the precurved array group were observed upon apical and basal electrode stimulation. Electrically evoked stapedius reflex thresholds were significantly higher in the 24RE group as compared with 24M and 24RCS groups. Comparing age-matched groups, open- and closed-set speech perception test scores were significantly higher in the 24RE array group. The precurved Freedom 24RE cochlear implant potentially provides a wider range of stimulation levels and better functional results than the straight electrode 24M and the precurved 24RCS devices in profoundly hearing impaired children.
    Otology & neurotology: official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology 09/2009; 30(7):908-15. · 1.44 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The role of apical versus basal cochlear implant electrode stimulation on central auditory development was examined. We hypothesized that, in children with early onset deafness, auditory development evoked by basal electrode stimulation would differ from that evoked more apically. Responses of the auditory nerve and brainstem, evoked by an apical and a basal implant electrode, were measured over the first year of cochlear implant use in 50 children with early onset severe to profound deafness who used hearing aids prior to implantation. Responses at initial stimulation were of larger amplitude and shorter latency when evoked by the apical electrode. No significant effects of residual hearing or age were found on initial response amplitudes or latencies. With implant use, responses evoked by both electrodes showed decreases in wave and interwave latencies reflecting decreased neural conduction time through the brainstem. Apical versus basal differences persisted with implant experience with one exception; eIII-eV interlatency differences decreased with implant use. Acute stimulation shows prolongation of basally versus apically evoked auditory nerve and brainstem responses in children with severe to profound deafness. Interwave latencies reflecting neural conduction along the caudal and rostral portions of the brainstem decreased over the first year of implant use. Differences in neural conduction times evoked by apical versus basal electrode stimulation persisted in the caudal but not rostral brainstem. Activity-dependent changes of the auditory brainstem occur in response to both apical and basal cochlear implant electrode stimulation.
    Clinical Neurophysiology 09/2007; 118(8):1671-84. · 3.14 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

View
9 Downloads
Available from
Jun 10, 2014