Training-Induced Functional Activation Changes in Dual-Task Processing: An fMRI Study

Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61810, USA.
Cerebral Cortex (Impact Factor: 8.67). 02/2007; 17(1):192-204. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhj137
Source: PubMed


Although training-induced changes in brain activity have been previously examined, plasticity associated with executive functions remains understudied. In this study, we examined training-related changes in cortical activity during a dual task requiring executive control. Two functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) sessions, one before training and one after training, were performed on both a control group and a training group. Using a region-of-interest analysis, we examined Time x Group and Time x Group x Condition interactions to isolate training-dependent changes in activation. We found that most regions involved in dual-task processing before training showed reductions in activation after training. Many of the decreases in activation were correlated with improved performance on the task. We also found an area in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex that showed an increase in activation for the training group for the dual-task condition, which was also correlated with improved performance. These results are discussed in relation to the efficacy of training protocols for modulating attention and executive functions, dual-task processing, and fMRI correlates of plasticity.

Download full-text


Available from: Jennifer Kim,
    • "The latter finding was attributed to two mechanisms. First, subjects experience a high sense of well-being and/or positive emotions after high-intensity exercise in the preferred sport, and second, with increasing automaticity of movements, less brain areas are activated (Jansma et al., 2001; Erickson et al., 2007). The experiment of Brümmer et al. (2011a) was performed in a thermo-neutral environment (22 °C), whereas De Pauw et al. (2013b) investigated the effect of prolonged, high-intensity cycling in a warm environment (30 °C) on electrocortical alterations within the brain (using sLORETA). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Fatigue during prolonged exercise is a multifactorial phenomenon. The complex interplay between factors originating from both the periphery and the brain will determine the onset of fatigue. In recent years, electrophysiological and imaging tools have been fine-tuned, allowing for an improved understanding of what happens in the brain. In the first part of the review, we present literature that studied the changes in electrocortical activity during and after exercise in normal and high ambient temperature. In general, exercise in a thermo-neutral environment or at light to moderate intensity increases the activity in the β frequency range, while exercising at high intensity or in the heat reduces β activity. In the second part, we review literature that manipulated brain neurotransmission, through either pharmacological or nutritional means, during exercise in the heat. The dominant outcomes were that manipulations changing brain dopamine concentration have the potential to delay fatigue, while the manipulation of serotonin had no effect and noradrenaline reuptake inhibition was detrimental for performance in the heat. Research on the effects of neurotransmitter manipulations on brain activity during or after exercise is scarce. The combination of brain imaging techniques with electrophysiological measures presents one of the major future challenges in exercise physiology/neurophysiology. © 2015 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
    Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports 06/2015; 25 Suppl 1(S1):65-78. DOI:10.1111/sms.12350 · 2.90 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Therefore, our results showing immediate reduction of cortical activation appear to be distinguished from those of previous studies on motor learning and common sense (Hund-Georgiadis and von Cramon 1999; Lang and Bastian 2002; Erickson et al. 2007; Picard et al. 2013). Many functional neuroimaging studies have reported on the differences of cortical activation between one motor task and the addition of another task (Gordon et al. 1998; Johansen-Berg and Matthews 2002; Erickson et al. 2007; Lee et al. 2010; Johannsen et al. 2013; Wu et al. 2013; Beurskens et al. 2014). Among these studies, only a few have reported on change in activation in the SM1, like the current study (Johansen-Berg and Matthews 2002; Lee et al. 2010). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Nine right-handed normal subjects were recruited for this study. We compared the cortical activation during execution of hand movements (right finger flexion-extension) with that during execution of hand movements while chewing gum (right side chewing). We found that execution of hand movements while chewing gum induced less activation in the contralateral SM1 than hand movements alone. Based on our findings, it appears chewing gum during execution of hand movements enhanced the efficiency of hand movements.
    Somatosensory & Motor Research 06/2015; 32(2):110-113. DOI:10.3109/08990220.2014.991782 · 0.64 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Interestingly, studies have demonstrated that practice and cognitive training can diminish the decline in performance, or multitasking cost, which occurs when engaged in multitasking behavior (Anguera et al., 2013; Bherer et al., 2005; Kramer, Larish, & Strayer, 1995). Importantly, training-based improvements in multitasking performance are thought to arise from cortical activity changes in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) (Erickson et al., 2007). A collective view of these findings led us to hypothesize that multitasking performance may be influenced by neuroplastic changes in prefrontal cortical function, and that the DLPFC is a critical node involved in the dynamic changes of this cognitive control system. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) has been proposed to play an important role in neural processes that underlie multitasking performance. However, this claim is underexplored in terms of direct causal evidence. The current study aimed to delineate the causal involvement of the DLPFC during multitasking by modulating neural activity with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) prior to engagement in a demanding multitasking paradigm. The study is a single-blind, crossover, sham-controlled experiment. Anodal tDCS or sham tDCS was applied over left DLPFC in forty-one healthy young adults (aged 18-35 years) immediately before they engaged in a 3-D video game designed to assess multitasking performance. Participants were separated into three subgroups: real-sham (i.e., real tDCS in the first session, followed by sham tDCS in the second session 1 h later), sham-real (sham tDCS first session, real tDCS second session), and sham-sham (sham tDCS in both sessions). The real-sham group showed enhanced multitasking performance and decreased multitasking cost during the second session, compared to first session, suggesting delayed cognitive benefits of tDCS. Interestingly, performance benefits were observed only for multitasking and not on a single-task version of the game. No significant changes were found between the first and second sessions for either the sham-real or the sham-sham groups. These results suggest a causal role of left prefrontal cortex in facilitating the simultaneous performance of more than one task, or multitasking. Moreover, these findings reveal that anodal tDCS may have delayed benefits that reflect an enhanced rate of learning. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
    Cortex 05/2015; 69. DOI:10.1016/j.cortex.2015.05.014 · 5.13 Impact Factor
Show more