Fleige, S and Pfaffl, MW. RNA integrity and the effect on the real-time qRT-PCR performance. Mol Aspects Med 27: 126-139

Physiology Weihenstephan, Center of Life and Food Sciences (ZIEL), Technical University of Munich, 85350 Freising, Germany.
Molecular Aspects of Medicine (Impact Factor: 10.24). 04/2006; 27(2-3):126-39. DOI: 10.1016/j.mam.2005.12.003
Source: PubMed


The assessment of RNA integrity is a critical first step in obtaining meaningful gene expression data. Working with low-quality RNA may strongly compromise the experimental results of downstream applications which are often labour-intensive, time-consuming, and highly expensive. Using intact RNA is a key element for the successful application of modern molecular biological methods, like qRT-PCR or micro-array analysis. To verify RNA quality nowadays commercially available automated capillary-electrophoresis systems are available which are on the way to become the standard in RNA quality assessment. Profiles generated yield information on RNA concentration, allow a visual inspection of RNA integrity, and generate approximated ratios between the mass of ribosomal sub-units. In this review, the importance of RNA quality for the qRT-PCR was analyzed by determining the RNA quality of different bovine tissues and cell culture. Independent analysis systems are described and compared (OD measurement, NanoDrop, Bioanalyzer 2100 and Experion). Advantage and disadvantages of RNA quantity and quality assessment are shown in performed applications of various tissues and cell cultures. Further the comparison and correlation between the total RNA integrity on PCR performance as well as on PCR efficiency is described. On the basis of the derived results we can argue that qRT-PCR performance is affected by the RNA integrity and PCR efficiency in general is not affected by the RNA integrity. We can recommend a RIN higher than five as good total RNA quality and higher than eight as perfect total RNA for downstream application.

Download full-text


Available from: Michael W Pfaffl,
  • Source
    • "qRT-PCR qRT-PCR primers for the above 11 genes were designed using primer-blast tool (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/tools/primerblast/ ) with melting temperature within 58–62 • C and a primer length of 18–26 bp. The length of amplicons was 90–251 bp with high polymerization efficiency, which minimized the RNA integrity impact (Fleige and Pfaffl, 2006). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) is the preferred method for accurate analysis of targeted gene expression. The aim of this study was to validate optimal reference genes for qRT-PCR analyses in pear pollen. Ten candidate reference genes were chosen and examined in 36 pear samples. Among these, PbrEF1α, PbrGAPDH and PbrAPT were developed to detect the purity of cDNA. Three qRT-PCR analysis programs, geNorm, NormFinder and BestKeeper, were applied for systematic determinations. The results showed that all the candidate reference genes could be used for qRT-PCR normalization in pear pollen. PbrEF1α was the most stable reference gene across all abiotic stresses of pollen samples, especially for high temperature, N-butyl alcohol and NaCl treatments, and also during pollen development. PbrTUB was the optimal reference gene for pear tissue expression. PbrGAPDH was suitable for low temperature treatment and PbrPP2A was suitable for abscisic acid and also for NaCl treatment. For CuCl2 treatment, either of reference genes PbrCYP and PbrUBI was suitable. To illustrate the suitability of these reference genes, the expression profile of PbrVHA-a was used to analyze the expression patterns in different pear tissues, pollen developing stages and NaCl treatment. The results provide a valuable resource for gene expression characterization in pear pollen.
    Scientia Horticulturae 07/2015; 190:43-56. DOI:10.1016/j.scienta.2015.04.010 · 1.37 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Quantity and quality may vary due to the degradation of nucleic acids (especially RNA) during the isolation or storage processes. Therefore, every nucleic acid preparation should be assessed for quality and quantity (Fleige and Pfaffl 2006). In addition, the detection of RNA is a more sensitive and complicated process than the detection of DNA, especially because of the need of reverse transcribing the RNA and preventing it from contamination with ribonucleases . "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: RNA viruses are pathogenic agents of many serious infectious diseases affecting humans and animals. The detection of pathogenic RNA viruses is based on modern molecular methods, of which the most widely used methods are the reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the real-time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). All steps of RT-PCR and qRT-PCR should be strictly controlled to ensure the validity of obtained results. False-negative results may be caused not only by inhibition of RT or/and PCR steps but also by failure of the nucleic acid extraction step, particularly in the case of viral RNA extraction. The control of nucleic acid extraction generally involves the utilization of a non-pathogenic virus (process control virus) of similar structural properties to those of the target virus. Although in clinical samples the use of such process control virus is only recommended, in other kinds of settings such as food matrices its use is necessary. Currently, several different process control viruses are used for these purposes. Process control viruses can also be constructed artificially using technology for production of MS2 phage-like particles, which have many advantages in comparison with other used controls and are especially suited for controlling the detection and quantification of certain types of RNA viruses. The technology for production of MS2 phage-like particles is theoretically well established, uses the knowledge gained from the study of the familiar bacteriophage MS2 and utilizes many different approaches for the construction of the various process control viruses. Nevertheless, the practical use of MS2 phage-like particles in routine diagnostics is relatively uncommon. The current situation with regard to the use of MS2 phage-like particles as process control viruses in detection of RNA viruses and different methods of their construction, purification and use are summarized and discussed in this review.
    Food and Environmental Virology 02/2015; 7(2). DOI:10.1007/s12560-015-9188-2 · 2.36 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "RNA exposed to heat and potential nucleases can degrade rapidly. While RNA degradation can be 55 accounted for in qPCR with appropriate controls [2], other applications such as cDNA cloning or 56 transcriptome sequencing require relatively intact RNA. To assess if intact transcripts could be isolated 57 from a single proteinase K digested worm, we amplified fragments of the ttn-1 cDNA. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Traditional RNA extraction methods rely on the use of hazardous chemicals such as phenol, chloroform, guanidinium thiocyanate to disrupt cells and inactivate RNAse simultaneously. RNA isolation from Caenorhabditis elegans presents another challenge due to its tough cuticle, therefore several repeated freeze–thaw cycles may be needed to disrupt the cuticle before the cell contents could be released. In addition, a large number of animals are required for successful RNA isolation. To overcome these issues, we have developed a simple and efficient method using proteinase K and a brief heat treatment to release RNA of quality suitable for quantitative PCR analysis.The benefits of the method are:
    MethodsX 02/2015; 1. DOI:10.1016/j.mex.2015.02.002
Show more