High-grade urothelial carcinoma of the renal pelvis: clinicopathologic study of 108 cases with emphasis on unusual morphologic variants

Department of Pathology, Ohio State University Medical Center, The Ohio State University, University Hospital, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Modern Pathology (Impact Factor: 6.36). 05/2006; 19(4):494-503. DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.3800559
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT A clinicopathologic study of 108 cases of high-grade urothelial carcinomas of the renal pelvis is presented. Of the 108 tumors, 44 (40%) showed unusual morphologic features, including micropapillary areas (four cases), lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma (two cases), sarcomatoid carcinoma (eight cases, including pseudoangiosarcomatous type), squamous differentiation and squamous cell carcinoma (15 cases), clear cells (two cases), glandular differentiation (two cases), rhabdoid, signet-ring or plasmacytoid cells (four cases), pseudosarcomatous stromal changes (four cases) and intratubular extension into the renal pelvis (three cases). Pathological staging was available in 62 patients; of these, 46 cases (74%) were in high stage (pT2-pT4) and 16 (26%) were in low stage (pTis, pTa, pT1). Clinical follow-up ranging from 1 to 256 months (median: 50 months) was available in 42 patients; of these, 26 (61%) died of tumor with a median survival of 31 months. The patients who did not die of their tumors showed only minimal or focal infiltration of the renal parenchyma by urothelial carcinoma, whereas those who died of their tumors showed massive infiltration of the kidney by the tumor. High-grade urothelial carcinomas of the renal pelvis can show a broad spectrum of histologic features similar to those seen in the urinary bladder. Our results support the finding that, unlike urothelial carcinomas of the bladder, the majority of primary urothelial carcinomas of the renal pelvis are of high histologic grade and present in advanced stages. Our study further highlights the fact that, in the renal pelvis, urothelial carcinomas show a tendency to frequently display unusual morphologic features and metaplastic phenomena. The importance of recognizing these morphologic variants of urothelial carcinoma in the renal pelvis is to avoid confusion with other conditions. The possibility of a high-grade urothelial carcinoma should always be considered in the evaluation of a tumor displaying unusual morphologic features in the renal pelvis, and attention to proper sampling as well as the use of immunohistochemical stains will be of importance to arrive at the correct diagnosis.

  • Source
    The Korean Journal of Pathology 12/2014; 48(6):458-61. DOI:10.4132/KoreanJPathol.2014.48.6.458 · 0.17 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Since the description of atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors of the central nervous system and renal/extrarenal malignant rhabdoid tumors in children, the clinicopathologic spectrum of neoplasms having in common a highly variable rhabdoid cell component (0% to 100%) and consistent loss of nuclear SMARCB1 (INI1) expression has been steadily expanding to include cribriform neuroepithelial tumor of the ventricle, renal medullary carcinoma and a subset of collecting duct carcinoma, epithelioid sarcoma, subsets of miscellaneous benign and malignant soft tissue tumors, and rare rhabdoid carcinoma variants of gastroenteropancreatic, sinonasal, and genitourinary tract origin. Although a majority of SMARCB1-deficient neoplasms arise de novo, the origin of SMARCB1-deficient neoplasia in the background of a phenotypically or genetically definable differentiated SMARCB1-intact "parent neoplasm" has been convincingly demonstrated, highlighting the rare occurrence of rhabdoid tumors as "double-hit neoplasia." As a group, SMARCB1-deficient neoplasms occur over a wide age range (0 to 80 y), may be devoid of rhabdoid cells or display uniform rhabdoid morphology, and follow a clinical course that varies from benign to highly aggressive causing death within a few months irrespective of aggressive multimodality therapy. Generally applicable criteria that would permit easy recognition of these uncommon neoplasms do not exist. Diagnosis is based on site-specific and entity-specific sets of clinicopathologic, immunophenotypic, and/or molecular criteria. SMARCB1 immunohistochemistry has emerged as a valuable tool in confirming or screening for SMARCB1-deficient neoplasms. This review summarizes the different phenotypic and topographic subgroups of SMARCB1-deficient neoplasms including sporadic and familial, benign and malignant, and rhabdoid and nonrhabdoid variants, highlighting their phenotypic heterogeneity and molecular complexity.
    Advances in Anatomic Pathology 11/2014; 21(6):394-410. DOI:10.1097/PAP.0000000000000038 · 3.10 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Upper urinary tract urothelial cell carcinomas (UUT-UCs) are uncommon and are defined as urothelial carcinoma involving the urinary tract from the renal calyces, renal pelvis to the distal ureter. One well-known an peculiar histopathological finding in UUT-UC is urothelial carcinoma with intratubular spread (retrograde spread within renal tubules). However, this special feature has not been systematically studied. We therefore collected a total of 53 consecutive cases of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinomas (UUT-UCs), and studied the clinical and pathological features of intratubular spread (IS). A cocktail stain comprised of antibodies PAX8 and p63 together with PAS was validated and employed to facilitate the study of intratubular spread. Seventeen cases (31.5%) showed intratubular spread demonstrated by either H&E stain and/or the cocktail stain. All of the 17 cases wit intratubular spread had tumor involvement of the renal calyx; the majority of these (14/17, 82.4%) were high grade urothelial carcinoma and the remainder (3/17, 17.6%) were low grade. 4 of 17cases (23.5%) were non-invasive. We classified intratubular spread into 4 different types, based on histopathological patterns: pagetoid, typical, florid, and secondary invasion from intratubular spread. In conclusion, study shows intratubular spread of urothelial carcinoma is fairly common phenomenon in UUT-UC and is associated with a variety of clinical-pathological features. High grade UUT-UC tends to have more extensive intratubular spread and secondary invasion into renal parenchyma. Distinct morphological characteristics as well as the staining pattern from a unique cocktail stain help to identify and evaluate intratubular spread of urothelial carcinoma. Recognizing these different types of intratubular spreading (IS) is crucial for accurate staging of some upper urinary tract urothelial carcinomas (UUT-UCs).