Article

Mortality Rates Among Augmentation Mammoplasty Patients

Epidemiology and Biostatistics Program, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Epidemiology (Impact Factor: 6.18). 04/2006; 17(2):162-9. DOI: 10.1097/01.ede.0000197056.84629.19
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT A large follow-up study of cosmetic breast implant patients previously suggested an overall decrease in mortality but increased risks of brain and respiratory cancers and of suicides.
This cohort of 12,144 implant patients and 3614 patients with other types of plastic surgeries was followed for 5 additional years, enabling derivations of standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) based on population rates and relative risks (RRs) based on comparisons with the other patients.
A total of 443 implant and 221 other plastic surgery patients were identified as deceased (SMR = 0.65 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.6-0.7] and 0.56 [0.5-0.6], respectively). Despite evidence that implants can interfere with mammographic visualization, there was no evidence that implant patients had a higher risk of death from breast cancer as compared with either the general population or other plastic surgery patients. The previous excess risk of brain cancer deaths among implant patients was attenuated by follow-up (as the result of no additional deaths; SMR = 1.43, 0.8-2.5; RR = 2.07, 0.5-8.9). A previously observed excess risk of respiratory cancer deaths persisted in comparisons with other plastic surgery patients (RR = 1.63; 1.0-2.7), but there was no evidence of a trend of risk with follow-up time. Implant patients also showed an elevated risk of suicide (SMR = 1.63, 1.1-2.3; RR = 2.58, 0.9-7.8) and of deaths caused by motor vehicle accidents (RR = 1.73; 0.6-5.4).
Although several elevations in cause-specific mortality were attenuated by additional follow-up, the excess risk of suicide among the implant patients remains of concern.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Theodore Colton, Feb 26, 2015
3 Followers
 · 
141 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: An understanding of the scope and nature of negative psychological complications resulting from plastic surgery is vital. This knowledge is essential to improve the complex interactions that patients experience as part of their surgical intervention. This is a national survey of patients' psychological complications reported by 312 board certified plastic surgical nurses. Perceived patient psychological complications were reported at a higher rate than perceived physical complications (p> .001), with peri-operative complications of anxiety and mild depression being most prevalent. Less frequent psychological complications included patient disappointment and severe depression. Not surprisingly, surgical site pain and nonspecific physical distress were the most frequent physical complications; sleep disturbance was common. Psychological complications occur at higher rates than do physical complications in plastic surgical practices. Patients with pre-existing psychological conditions are more at risk for peri-operative psychological complications. Nurses should be adequately prepared to screen, support, and coordinate psychological treatment for plastic surgery patients with the plastic surgeon.
    Plastic surgical nursing: official journal of the American Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgical Nurses 01/2009; 29(1):25-30; quiz 31-2. DOI:10.1097/01.PSN.0000347721.21027.8b
  • Plastic surgical nursing: official journal of the American Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgical Nurses 01/2010; 30(1):50-3. DOI:10.1097/PSN.0b013e3181cfe6aa
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Epidemiologic evidence does not support a consistently increased cancer risk among women with cosmetic breast implants, but few studies have assessed risk beyond 15 years. Swedish women who underwent cosmetic breast implantation for the first time between January 1, 1965, and December 31, 1993 (N = 3486), were followed through December 31, 2002. Cancer incidence was ascertained through the nationwide Swedish Cancer Registry. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to compare cancer incidence of women with implants with women in the general population. Mean follow-up among women with breast implants was 18.4 years (range = 0.1-37.8 years). The incidence of breast cancer was below expectation (SIR = 0.7, 95% CI = 0.6 to 1.0), whereas lung cancer was above expectation (SIR = 2.2, 95% CI = 1.3 to 3.4). With respect to cancer overall and all other specific cancer sites, including brain cancer and sarcoma, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and multiple myeloma, no statistically significantly increased or decreased SIRs were observed. Stratification by duration of follow-up revealed no statistically significantly increased or decreased SIR, with the exception of a two- to threefold excess of lung cancer among women followed for more than 15 years, which would be expected due to the high prevalence of smoking among the Swedish women with implants in our study.
    CancerSpectrum Knowledge Environment 05/2006; 98(8):557-60. DOI:10.1093/jnci/djj134 · 15.16 Impact Factor
Show more