Article

The impact of a concurrent trauma alert evaluation on time to head computed tomography in patients with suspected stroke.

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Academic Emergency Medicine (Impact Factor: 1.76). 04/2006; 13(3):349-52. DOI: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.10.011
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Emergency department (ED) overcrowding threatens quality of care by delaying the time to diagnosis and treatment of patients with time-sensitive diseases, such as acute stroke.
The authors hypothesized that the presence of a trauma alert evaluation would impede the time to head computed tomography (hCT) in patients with stroke-like symptoms.
This was a secondary analysis of prospectively collected data on patients with potential stroke who received an hCT in an urban trauma center ED from January 1, 2004, to November 30, 2004. Structured data collection included historical and examination items, National Institutes of Health (NIH) stroke scale score, laboratory and radiographic results, and final diagnosis. Admitted patients were followed in hospital. Patients who presented within one hour following a trauma evaluation were compared with patients who presented without concurrent trauma for triage time until completion of hCT. Chi-square, t-tests, and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were used for comparisons.
The 171 patients enrolled had a mean (+/- standard deviation) age of 60.7 (+/- 7) years; 60% were female; and 58% were African American. Of these, 72 patients had a significant cerebrovascular event (38 [22%] ischemic stroke, 25 [15%] transient ischemic attack, seven [4%] intracranial hemorrhage, one [0.6%] subarachnoid hemorrhage, and one [0.6%] subdural hematoma). The remaining diagnoses included 4.6% migraine, 2.3% seizure, 2.9% syncope, 2.3% Bell's palsy, and 2.9% vertigo. There was no significant difference in time to hCT in patients who presented during a trauma activation and those who did not (99 minutes [interquartile range (IQR) = 24-156] vs. 101 minutes [IQR = 43-151.5]; p = 0.537). In subgroup analysis of patients with a significant cerebrovascular event, times to hCT were also similar (24 minutes [IQR = 12-99] vs. 61 minutes [IQR = 15-126]; p = 0.26).
In the authors' institution, the presence of concurrent trauma evaluation does not delay CT imaging of patients with potential stroke.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
52 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this study, a discrete-event simulation approach was used to model Emergency Department's (ED) patient flow to investigate the effect of inpatient boarding on the ED efficiency in terms of the National Emergency Department Crowding Scale (NEDOCS) score and the rate of patients who leave without being seen (LWBS). The decision variable in this model was the boarder-released-ratio defined as the ratio of admitted patients whose boarding time is zero to all admitted patients. Our analysis shows that the Overcrowded(+) (a NEDOCS score over 100) ratio decreased from 88.4% to 50.4%, and the rate of LWBS patients decreased from 10.8% to 8.4% when the boarder-released-ratio changed from 0% to 100%. These results show that inpatient boarding significantly impacts both the NEDOCS score and the rate of LWBS patient and this analysis provides a quantification of the impact of boarding on emergency department patient crowding.
    Journal of Medical Systems 10/2010; 34(5):919-29. · 1.78 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Despite stroke being the third leading cause of death and a leading cause of disability in the United States, less than 7% of stroke survivors receive tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) in the treatment of acute stroke. The purpose of this review was to determine what research is available on barriers to tPA use and to determine gaps in the literature. A search of the literature was conducted using Medline, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Embase, and PubMed. Keywords were stroke, emergency, nursing, thrombolytics, cerebrovascular accident, ischemia, intervention, tPA, and barriers. Pertinent references from articles obtained were searched as well. The search yielded 45 articles for review. Barriers to tPA use were found in both prehospital and in-hospital settings. Prehospital delays were related to contacting primary care physicians, mode of arrival to the hospital, and survivors' lack of knowledge regarding stroke. Sources of in-hospital delays included non-stroke center status, lack of training of emergency department staff, delays in computed tomography scans, and poor understanding regarding priority stroke treatment (e.g., mild or improving symptoms and disparities related to age, gender, and race). Future research to evaluate the impact of nursing care and attitudes toward stroke patients on the administration of tPA is recommended.
    Journal of Neuroscience Nursing 04/2010; 42(2):88-94. · 0.76 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Trauma patients consume many resources in the emergency department (ED), but what effect their care may have upon other patients seeking care is unclear. We sought to determine whether the presentation of trauma patients to the ED diverts staff and resources away from non-trauma patients. We hypothesized that the admission of trauma patients to the ED would result in longer times to physician evaluation and completion of laboratory and imaging studies, as well as a longer length of stay in the ED. This retrospective study reviewed and compared the charts of two groups of non-trauma ED patients. The group affected by trauma arrived up to 30 min after a trauma activation. The group unaffected by trauma arrived >3 h before or 3 h after a trauma activation. Times from arrival to initial MD evaluation, X-ray study, and computed tomography (CT) scan were documented. Median times from order to completion of laboratory results and imaging were compared, as well as total ED lengths of stay (LOS). Median time from arrival to MD evaluation for patients affected by a trauma activation was almost twice as long as for unaffected patients (42 vs. 23 min, respectively; p < 0.001). Times from arrival to X-ray study, CT scan order, and laboratory results were all significantly greater for patients affected by a trauma activation (p < 0.001). For patients who required admission to the hospital, the affected group had a median LOS that was increased by 16 min (224 vs. 208 min, respectively) when compared to unaffected patients (p = 0.04). In the setting studied, the arrival of a trauma patient delayed physician evaluation and diagnostic testing. It only modestly increased the ED LOS for patients needing hospital admission.
    Journal of Emergency Medicine 07/2011; 41(1):90-4. · 1.33 Impact Factor