The Impact of a Concurrent Trauma Alert Evaluation on Time to Head Computed Tomography in Patients with Suspected Stroke

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Academic Emergency Medicine (Impact Factor: 2.01). 04/2006; 13(3):349-52. DOI: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.10.011
Source: PubMed


Emergency department (ED) overcrowding threatens quality of care by delaying the time to diagnosis and treatment of patients with time-sensitive diseases, such as acute stroke.
The authors hypothesized that the presence of a trauma alert evaluation would impede the time to head computed tomography (hCT) in patients with stroke-like symptoms.
This was a secondary analysis of prospectively collected data on patients with potential stroke who received an hCT in an urban trauma center ED from January 1, 2004, to November 30, 2004. Structured data collection included historical and examination items, National Institutes of Health (NIH) stroke scale score, laboratory and radiographic results, and final diagnosis. Admitted patients were followed in hospital. Patients who presented within one hour following a trauma evaluation were compared with patients who presented without concurrent trauma for triage time until completion of hCT. Chi-square, t-tests, and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were used for comparisons.
The 171 patients enrolled had a mean (+/- standard deviation) age of 60.7 (+/- 7) years; 60% were female; and 58% were African American. Of these, 72 patients had a significant cerebrovascular event (38 [22%] ischemic stroke, 25 [15%] transient ischemic attack, seven [4%] intracranial hemorrhage, one [0.6%] subarachnoid hemorrhage, and one [0.6%] subdural hematoma). The remaining diagnoses included 4.6% migraine, 2.3% seizure, 2.9% syncope, 2.3% Bell's palsy, and 2.9% vertigo. There was no significant difference in time to hCT in patients who presented during a trauma activation and those who did not (99 minutes [interquartile range (IQR) = 24-156] vs. 101 minutes [IQR = 43-151.5]; p = 0.537). In subgroup analysis of patients with a significant cerebrovascular event, times to hCT were also similar (24 minutes [IQR = 12-99] vs. 61 minutes [IQR = 15-126]; p = 0.26).
In the authors' institution, the presence of concurrent trauma evaluation does not delay CT imaging of patients with potential stroke.

Download full-text


Available from: Angela M Mills, Mar 17, 2015
  • Source
    • "In one of the few reviews of CT efficiency, Fung Kon Jin and colleagues [10] found that the median start time in a high-volume “stream-lined” level-1 American trauma center for a severely injured cohort (median ISS 18) was 82 minutes, with the median time from arrival until completion of the diagnostic trauma evaluation being nearly 2 hours (114 minutes). The relevance of this time may be increased by noting that the mean time to CT head for non-traumatic neurological emergencies in a tertiary care academic institution that prioritized CT scanning for potential stroke over all other emergency department patients except trauma was either 99 or 101 minutes, depending on whether there were competing trauma activations [26]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) constitutes the leading cause of posttraumatic mortality. Practically, the major interventions required to treat TBI predicate expedited transfer to CT after excluding other immediately life-threatening conditions. At our center, trauma responses variably consist of either full trauma activation (FTA) including an attending trauma surgeon or a non-trauma team response (NTTR). We sought to explore whether FTAs expedited the time to CT head (TTCTH). Retrospective review augmented demographics of 88 serious head injuries identified from a Regional Trauma Registry within one year at a level I trauma center. The data were analyzed using STATA. There were 58 FTAs and 30 NTTRs; 86% of FTAs and 17% of NTTRs were intubated prehospital. Although FTAs were more seriously injured (median ISS 29, MAIS head 19, GCS score at scene 6.0), NTTRs were also severely injured (median ISS 25, MAIS head 21, GCS at scene 10) and older (median 54 vs. 26 years). Median TTCTH was double without dedicated FTA (median 50 vs. 26 minutes, p < 0.001), despite similar justifiable delays (53% NTTR, 52% FTA). Without FTA, most delays (69%) were for emergency intubation. TTCTH after securing the airway was longer for NTTR group (median 38 vs. 26 minutes, p =0.0013). Even with no requirements for ED interventions, TTCTH for FTA was less than half versus NTTR (25 vs. 61 minutes, p =0.0013). Multivariate regression analysis indicated age and FTA with an attending surgeon as significant predictors of TTCTH, although the majority of variability in TTCTH was not explained by these two variables (R^2=0.33). Full trauma activations involving attending trauma surgeons were quicker at transferring serious head injury patients to CT. Patients with FTA were younger and more seriously injured. Discerning the reasons for delays to CT should be used to refine protocols aimed at minimizing unnecessary delays and enhancing workforce efficiency and clinical outcome.
    World Journal of Emergency Surgery 11/2013; 8(1):48. DOI:10.1186/1749-7922-8-48 · 1.47 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: An algorithm is reported for soft failure detection and estimation which has very modest computational requirements. Soft failures manifest themselves as deviations from the expected statistical behaviour of system inputs. The detection scheme utilizes only one Kalman filter and requires the implementation of a Wald Sequential Detector (WSD). The algorithm consists of applying the Sequential Probability Ratio Test (SPRT) to the nonwhite Kalman filter innovations for rapid failure detection. The Average Sample Number (ASN) is used for estimating failed parameters. Some computer simulation results are presented.
    Decision and Control including the Symposium on Adaptive Processes, 1979 18th IEEE Conference on; 01/1980
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Our objective is to review the epidemiology and proposed pathophysiology of migraine headache and its association with patent foramen ovale (PFO). We further elucidate the technical aspects of PFO closure and its possible impact on migraine headache. Upon reviewing English-language publications listed in MEDLINE relating to migraine headache, PFO; and transcatheter closure of PFO, we selected case series, retrospective and prospective studies relevant to the topic. PFO closure is being performed in annually increasing numbers worldwide for a variety of indications. The percutaneous technique of PFO closure has been shown to be safe and effective in multiple case series. Further, primarily retrospective case-control studies demonstrate a link between PFO closure and improvement of migraine headache. Few prospective data confirm the initial RESULTS: However, the only randomized, controlled trial finished to date analyzing the effect of PFO closure on migraine failed to reach its primary outcome of resolution of migraine following the intervention. The evidence of a benefit on migraine headache following PFO closure is not convincing, but certainly intriguing. With currently ongoing trials, more information related to this topic can be expected. In the meantime, the question whether we should close PFOs in patients with migraine headaches cannot be answered.
    Minerva medica 03/2007; 98(1):25-36. · 0.91 Impact Factor
Show more