The value of cytokeratin immunohistochemistry in the evaluation of axillary sentinel lymph nodes in patients with lobular breast carcinoma

University of Florence, Florens, Tuscany, Italy
Journal of Clinical Pathology (Impact Factor: 2.92). 06/2006; 59(5):518-22. DOI: 10.1136/jcp.2005.029991
Source: PubMed


Cytokeratin immunohistochemistry (IHC) reveals a higher rate of occult lymph node metastases among lobular carcinomas than among ductal breast cancers. IHC is widely used but is seldom recommended for the evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer patients. Objective: To assess the value of cytokeratin IHC for the detection of metastases in sentinel lymph nodes of patients with invasive lobular carcinoma.
The value of IHC, the types of metastasis found by this method, and the involvement of non-sentinel lymph nodes were analysed in a multi-institutional cohort of 449 patients with lobular breast carcinoma, staged by sentinel lymph node biopsy and routine assessment of the sentinel lymph nodes by IHC when multilevel haematoxylin and eosin staining revealed no metastasis.
189 patients (42%) had some type of sentinel node involvement, the frequency of this increasing with increasing tumour size. IHC was needed for identification of 65 of these cases: 17 of 19 isolated tumour cells, 40 of 64 micrometastases, and 8 of 106 larger metastases were detected by this means. Non-sentinel-node involvement was noted in 66 of 161 cases undergoing axillary dissection. Although isolated tumour cells were not associated with further lymph node involvement, sentinel node positivity detected by IHC was associated with further nodal metastases in 12 of 50 cases (0.24), a proportion that is higher than previously reported for breast cancer in general.
IHC is recommended for the evaluation of sentinel nodes from patients with lobular breast carcinoma, as the micrometastases or larger metastases demonstrated by this method are often associated with a further metastatic nodal load.

Download full-text


Available from: Cristi Marin,
  • Source
    • "In this scenario, a definitive SLN analysis is usually performed postoperatively by staining consecutive formalin-fixed tissue sections using conventional H&E-based immunohistochemistry (IHC). Unfortunately, the classical pathologist's evaluation of the tissue sections can sometimes neglect low volume metastases789. Therefore, there is a need for rapid and reproducible methods with high sensitivity and specificity that can be routinely used for the intraoperative assessment of the SLN involvement status. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The one-step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA) assay is a molecular procedure that can identify deposits of breast cancer (BC) cells in the sentinel lymph node (SLN). We examined the consistency of the OSNA assay with a classic hematoxylin-eosin (H&E)-based immunohistochemistry (IHC) study and evaluated how OSNA-based axillary staging might impact the therapeutic management of BC patients. SLN biopsy results were considered to be positive in 60 patients (40%) in the OSNA group (N = 148) and in 43 (28%) patients in the IHC cohort (N = 153, p = 0.023). There was no difference in the macrometastasis (22% for OSNA, 15% for H&E, p = 0.139) or micrometastasis (19% for OSNA, 13% for H&E, p = 0.166) rates, but we found statistically significant differences in the number of isolated tumor cells (1% for OSNA, 11% for H&E, p < 0.001). There were no differences in the administration rate of adjuvant systemic therapy between the OSNA (66% in the SLN(+) patients) and the H&E (74% in the SLN(+) patients) groups (p = 0.159). The OSNA assay allows for the detection of SLN metastases more precisely than conventional pathologic methods but does not alter the therapeutic management of SLN(+) BC patients.
    Scientific Reports 07/2014; 4:5743. DOI:10.1038/srep05743 · 5.58 Impact Factor

  • Breast Care 04/2007; 2(2). DOI:10.1159/000101043 · 0.63 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: It is well accepted that detailed analysis of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) may upstage breast cancer, but generally involves the identification of low-volume metastases (including isolated tumor cells and clusters). Although several guidelines recommend therapeutic interventions for micrometastases, there is also evidence supporting therapeutic interventions only for macrometastases. There is also evidence in support of means of regional disease control other than axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). The pathologic evaluation of SLNs should consider the clinical setting. Intraoperative assessment is indicated only if ALND is an immediate interventional option for SLN positivity. Generally, hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections taken at 2-mm step intervals are sufficient to disclose macrometastases, but if micrometastases are also considered in further treatment planning, smaller intervals and immunohistochemistry as well as quantitative molecular methods may also be considered.
    Current Breast Cancer Reports 06/2012; 4(2). DOI:10.1007/s12609-012-0073-9
Show more