Article

Interfacial rheology of blood proteins adsorbed to the aqueous-buffer/air interface.

Integrative Biosciences Graduate Program, Huck Institutes for Life Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
Biomaterials (Impact Factor: 8.31). 07/2006; 27(18):3404-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.02.005
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Concentration-dependent, interfacial-shear rheology and interfacial tension of albumin, IgG, fibrinogen, and IgM adsorbed to the aqueous-buffer/air surface is interpreted in terms of a single viscoelastic layer for albumin but multi-layers for the larger proteins. Two-dimensional (2D) storage and loss moduli G(') and G(''), respectively, rise and fall as a function of bulk-solution concentration, signaling formation of a network of interacting protein molecules at the surface with viscoelastic properties. Over the same concentration range, interfacial spreading pressure Pi(LV) identical with gamma(lv)(o)-gamma(lv) rises to a sustained maximum Pi(LV)(max). Mixing as little as 25 w/v% albumin into IgG at fixed total protein concentration substantially reduces peak G('), strongly suggesting that albumin acts as rheological modifier by intercalating with adsorbed IgG molecules. By contrast to purified-protein solutions, serially diluted human blood serum shows no resolvable concentration-dependent G(')and G('').

1 Bookmark
 · 
115 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: As a result of aging populations in the industrialized world, the development of biomaterials for bone tissue engineering is becoming increasingly important. Rheology, which is a key parameter in process engineering, plays a derisive role in designing these biomaterials. As a prime example of biomaterials engineering, this review focuses on formulations that are based on hydroxyapatite (HAp). More specifically, we will discuss the contribution of rheology for designing injectable bone replacement materials, composite gel scaffolds, porous scaffolds and scaffolds that can be generated using rapid prototyping or 3D printing techniques.
    Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science 09/2014; 19(6). DOI:10.1016/j.cocis.2014.09.002 · 6.40 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Protein–surfactant mixtures arise in many industrial and biological systems, and indeed, blood itself is a mixture of serum albumins along with various other surface-active components. Bovine serum albumin (BSA) solutions, and globular proteins in general, exhibit an apparent yield stress in bulk rheological measurements at surprisingly low concentrations. By contrasting interfacial rheological measurements with corresponding interface-free data obtained using a microfluidic rheometer, we show that the apparent yield stress exhibited by these solutions arises from the presence of a viscoelastic layer formed due to the adsorption of protein molecules at the air–water interface. The coupling between instrument inertia and surface elasticity in a controlled stress device also results in a distinctive damped oscillatory strain response during creep experiments known as“creep ringing”. We show that this response can be exploited to extract the interfacial storage and loss moduli of the protein interface. The interfacial creep response at small strains can be described by a simple second order system, such as the linear Jeffreys model, however the interfacial response rapidly becomes nonlinear beyond strains of order 1%. We use the two complementary techniques of interfacial rheometry and microfluidic rheometry to examine the systematic changes in the surface and bulk material functions for mixtures of a common non-ionic surfactant, polysorbate 80, and BSA. It is observed that the nonlinear viscoelastic properties of the interface are significantly suppressed by the presence of even a relatively small amount of surfactant (csurf > 10−3 wt.%). Preferential interfacial adsorption of the mobile surfactant at these surfactant concentrations results in complete elimination of the bulk apparent yield stress exhibited by surfactant-free BSA solutions.
    Soft Matter 08/2011; 7(17):7623-7634. DOI:10.1039/C1SM05399J · 4.15 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Saponins are a wide class of natural surfactants, with molecules containing a rigid hydrophobic group (triterpenoid or steroid), connected via glycoside bonds to hydrophilic oligosaccharide chains. These surfactants are very good foam stabiliziers and emulsifiers, and show a range of nontrivial biological activities. The molecular mechanisms behind these unusual properties are unknown, and, therefore, the saponins have attracted significant research interest in recent years. In our previous study (Stanimirova et al. Langmuir 2011, 27, 12486−12498), we showed that the triterpenoid saponins extracted from Quillaja saponaria plant (Quillaja saponins) formed adsorption layers with unusually high surface dilatational elasticity, 280 ± 30 mN/m. In this Article, we study the shear rheological properties of the adsorption layers of Quillaja saponins. In addition, we study the surface shear rheological properties of Yucca saponins, which are of steroid type. The experimental results show that the adsorption layers of Yucca saponins exhibit purely viscous rheological response, even at the lowest shear stress applied, whereas the adsorption layers of Quillaja saponins behave like a viscoelastic two-dimensional body. For Quillaja saponins, a single master curve describes the data for the viscoelastic creep compliance versus deformation time, up to a certain critical value of the applied shear stress. Above this value, the layer compliance increases, and the adsorption layers eventually transform into viscous ones. The experimental creep−recovery curves for the viscoelastic layers are fitted very well by compound Voigt rheological model. The obtained results are discussed from the viewpoint of the layer structure and the possible molecular mechanisms, governing the rheological response of the saponin adsorption layers.
    Langmuir 08/2012; 28(28):12071. DOI:10.1021/la302150j · 4.38 Impact Factor