Article

Fluarix, inactivated split-virus influenza vaccine.

Division of Infectious Diseases, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada.
Expert opinion on biological therapy (Impact Factor: 3.65). 04/2006; 6(3):301-10. DOI: 10.1517/14712598.6.3.301
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Influenza is a potentially fatal respiratory infection resulting from several influenza virus strains. It causes annual epidemics of disease for which vaccination is the cornerstone of public health policy. The inadequacies of vaccine supply in the US during the 2004 influenza season revealed the deficiencies of current vaccine development and delivery. One outcome of this was the accelerated approval of an inactivated split-virus influenza vaccine, Fluarix. This paper reviews the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of this vaccine, and makes recommendations for the incorporation of Fluarix into the public health framework alongside other similar vaccines. Other directions to explore in an effort to secure future vaccine supply are considered.

0 Followers
 · 
110 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (Fluarix (™) , GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals) was licensed under US accelerated approval regulations. We performed a randomized, observer-blind, post-approval study to demonstrate its immunological non-inferiority versus an established US-licensed vaccine (primary endpoint). Adult (including elderly) subjects received a single injection of newly-licensed vaccine (n = 923) or established vaccine (n = 922). Serum hemagglutination-inhibition titers were determined pre-vaccination and 21-28 days after vaccination. Non-inferiority was assessed by post-vaccination geometric mean titer (GMT) ratio (upper 95% confidence interval [CI] ≤ 1.5) and difference in seroconversion rate (upper 95% CI ≤ 0.1) for all three vaccine strains. Safety was monitored for 6 months. The newly-licensed vaccine was non-inferior to the established vaccine in all subjects (≥ 18 years) and in elderly subjects (≥ 65 years). Adjusted GMT ratios (established/newly-licensed) against the H1N1, H3N2 and B strains were 0.65 (95% CI: 0.58, 0.73), 0.93 (0.83, 1.04) and 1.13 (1.03, 1.25) for all subjects and 0.75 (0.67, 0.85), 0.95 (0.82, 1.09) and 1.13 (1.00, 1.27) for elderly subjects. Corresponding values for the differences in seroconversion rate (established minus newly-licensed) were -0.12 (-0.16, -0.07), -0.02 (-0.06, 0.03) and 0.01 (-0.04, 0.06) for all subjects and -0.11 (-0.16, -0.05), -0.02 (-0.07, 0.04) and 0.02 (-0.04, 0.08) for elderly subjects. The most common adverse events with both vaccines were injection site pain, fatigue and headache, and no serious adverse events or deaths were considered related; there were no clinically relevant differences between the vaccines. In conclusion, the newly-licensed vaccine was well tolerated and immunologically non-inferior to the established vaccine for all three vaccine strains in the whole population and the elderly.
    Human vaccines 01/2011; 7(1):81-8. DOI:10.4161/hv.7.1.13553 · 3.64 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Lymphocyte depleting therapies have been used to treat refractory autoimmune disease, including RA, but treatment may be associated with long-term lymphopenia. It is unclear whether delayed reconstitution preferentially affects lymphocyte subsets, how this modulates immune challenges and whether thymic function influences the outcome. These questions are now addressed in a detailed analysis of RA patients 12 years after alemtuzumab (anti-CD52) treatment. Blood was obtained from 20 RA patients 12 years after alemtuzumab treatment. Lymphocyte subsets were enumerated by flow cytometry. T-cell receptor excision circles (TRECs)/ml were determined to quantify thymic function, and serological responses to neoantigens and recall antigens were assessed. RA patients remained lymphopenic 12 years after their first dose of alemtuzumab. CD5(+) B cells, which may be associated with autoantibody production, were significantly reduced in alemtuzumab-treated patients compared with age-matched disease controls. In addition, naïve and memory CD4(+) T-cell subsets were present in altered proportions in patients who had received alemtuzumab, with increased effector memory CD4(+) T cells, and decreased naïve and central memory CD4(+) T cells. TRECs were detectable in alemtuzumab-treated patients and correlated with CD4(+) lymphocyte counts. Vaccine responses to neoantigens and recall antigens fell within the normal range for an ageing population. Alemtuzumab therapy resulted in long-term alterations in lymphocyte subsets. The significance of these changes remains uncertain but patients respond normally to antigenic challenges. Thymic function remains an important determinant of T-cell reconstitution even several years after lymphocytotoxic therapy.
    Rheumatology (Oxford, England) 03/2012; 51(8):1397-406. DOI:10.1093/rheumatology/kes038 · 4.44 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A new trivalent inactivated split-virus influenza vaccine (TIV) was recently introduced in the United States. We assessed the efficacy of TIV against culture-confirmed influenza A and/or B. In this double-blind trial conducted from September 2006 to May 2007 in the Czech Republic and Finland, participants aged 18-64 years were randomized to receive 1 dose of TIV (n = 5103) or placebo (n = 2549). Influenza-like illnesses (ILI) (defined as at least 1 systemic symptom [fever {oral temperature, > or = 37.8 degrees C} and/or myalgia] and at least 1 respiratory symptom [cough and/or sore throat]) were identified by both active (biweekly phone contact) and passive surveillance. Nasal and throat swab specimens were collected for viral culture. The attack rate for culture-confirmed ILI was 3.2% in the placebo group, with most strains identified as influenza A (all except 1 were H3N2) matching the vaccine strain. There were 6 cases of influenza B, all of which were of a different lineage (Yamagata) than the vaccine strain. Vaccine efficacy against culture-confirmed influenza A and/or B due to strains antigenically matched to the vaccine was 66.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 51.9%-77.4%; P < .001) and to any strain was 61.6% (95% CI, 46.0%-72.8%; P < .001). TIV is efficacious against culture-confirmed influenza in healthy adults. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00363870.
    The Journal of Infectious Diseases 11/2009; 200(12):1861-9. DOI:10.1086/648406 · 5.78 Impact Factor