Fluarix™, inactivated split-virus influenza vaccine

Division of Infectious Diseases, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada.
Expert opinion on biological therapy (Impact Factor: 3.74). 04/2006; 6(3):301-10. DOI: 10.1517/14712598.6.3.301
Source: PubMed


Influenza is a potentially fatal respiratory infection resulting from several influenza virus strains. It causes annual epidemics of disease for which vaccination is the cornerstone of public health policy. The inadequacies of vaccine supply in the US during the 2004 influenza season revealed the deficiencies of current vaccine development and delivery. One outcome of this was the accelerated approval of an inactivated split-virus influenza vaccine, Fluarix. This paper reviews the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of this vaccine, and makes recommendations for the incorporation of Fluarix into the public health framework alongside other similar vaccines. Other directions to explore in an effort to secure future vaccine supply are considered.

7 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Children previously unvaccinated against influenza are recommended to receive two doses of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (TIV). This study assessed the age limit for a second dose of TIV in previously unvaccinated children. Two hundred and twenty-four children were immunized with TIV (Influsplit SSW/Fluarix; GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals). Subjects aged 6-9 years (n=110) received two doses of TIV 4 weeks apart; those aged 10-13 years (n=114) received a single dose. Serum haemagglutination inhibiting (HI) antibody titers were evaluated before and after each vaccination. CHMP criteria for HI antibody response were met for all three vaccine strains after one vaccine dose in children 10-13 years and after two doses in children 6-9 years. A marked benefit was observed in 8-year-old children after a second dose even though one dose would be sufficient against all strains. Our results provide additional evidence that Influsplit SSW/Fluarix is well tolerated and highly immunogenic in children and support recommendations that previously unvaccinated children aged <9 years should receive two doses of influenza vaccine.
    Vaccine 12/2007; 26(1):32-40. DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.10.049 · 3.62 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The use of inactivated influenza virus for the development of vaccines with broad heterosubtypic protection requires selective inactivation techniques that eliminate viral infectivity while preserving structural integrity. Here we tested if a hydrophobic inactivation approach reported for retroviruses could be applied to the influenza virus. By this approach, the transmembrane domains of viral envelope proteins are selectively targeted by the hydrophobic photoactivatable compound 1,5-iodonaphthyl-azide (INA). This probe partitions into the lipid bilayer of the viral envelope and upon far UV irradiation reacts selectively with membrane-embedded domains of proteins and lipids while the protein domains that localize outside the bilayer remain unaffected. INA treatment of influenza virus blocked infection in a dose-dependent manner without disrupting the virion or affecting neuraminidase activity. Moreover, the virus maintained the full activity in inducing pH-dependent lipid mixing, but pH-dependent redistribution of viral envelope proteins into the target cell membrane was completely blocked. These results indicate that INA selectively blocks fusion of the virus with the target cell membrane at the pore formation and expansion step. Using a murine model of influenza virus infection, INA-inactivated influenza virus induced potent anti-influenza virus serum antibody and T-cell responses, similar to live virus immunization, and protected against heterosubtypic challenge. INA treatment of influenza A virus produced a virus that is noninfectious, intact, and fully maintains the functional activity associated with the ectodomains of its two major envelope proteins, neuraminidase and hemagglutinin. When used as a vaccine given intranasally (i.n.), INA-inactivated influenza virus induced immune responses similar to live virus infection.
    Journal of Virology 06/2008; 82(9):4612-9. DOI:10.1128/JVI.02233-07 · 4.44 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A multicentre, randomized, phase III clinical trial in 5071 healthy adults was conducted to evaluate the safety and reactogenicity of a 15 microg HA dose of a candidate oil-in-water emulsion-based adjuvant system (AS)-adjuvanted split-virion H5N1 (AS-H5N1) vaccine compared to a licensed seasonal influenza vaccine, Fluarix.(1) Stringent criteria were used to evaluate adverse events and reactogenicity profile. Overall, 96.7% of the 5071 vaccinated subjects completed the study. Significantly more participants in the AS-H5N1 vaccine group reported general or local adverse events. Pain was the most common symptom in both treatment groups. Less than 1% of subjects withdrew from the study due to adverse events and no withdrawals were due to serious adverse events related to vaccination. The safety and reactogenicity profile of the AS-H5N1 candidate vaccine can be considered clinically acceptable in the context of its use against pandemic influenza.
    Vaccine 06/2008; 26(19):2378-88. DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.02.068 · 3.62 Impact Factor
Show more