The impact of intellectual functioning on symptoms and service use in schizophrenia. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 50, 288-294

Royal College of Psychiatrists-College Research Unit, London, UK.
Journal of Intellectual Disability Research (Impact Factor: 2.41). 05/2006; 50(Pt 4):288-94. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2006.00837.x
Source: PubMed


This study aims to evaluate differences in the clinical profiles and use of psychiatric services by people with schizophrenia with and without borderline intellectual functioning. Both groups in this study were receiving standard community psychiatric care.
A naturalistic sample of 372 people with schizophrenia completed the National Adult Reading Test. Data were collected prospectively over 18 months on psychiatric symptoms and service use. Three hundred and thirteen had normal intellectual functioning (mean age 43, range 20-76 years) and 59 had borderline or lower intellectual functioning (mean age 45, range 21-81 years). This was defined by a National Adult Reading Test error score of more than 40.
People with borderline or lower intellectual functioning had a lower quality of life, more severe psychotic symptoms, reduced functioning and fewer antidepressant prescriptions. There were no significant differences in service use including hospital admission.
People with schizophrenia and borderline or lower intellectual functioning are a more disabled group within general adult psychiatric services who should be the focus of initiatives for improved service delivery.

Download full-text


Available from: Tom Patrick Burns, Nov 21, 2014
29 Reads
  • Source
    • "More recently, the Monitor Compliance Framework (2013/14) includes an outcome requiring Foundation Trusts in England to demonstrate how they are making reasonable adjustments to the care pathways they offer for people with intellectual disabilities (Monitor, 2013). There is an increased emphasis on people with intellectual disabilities using mainstream services; however, some authors have suggested that integrated services may not fully meet the needs of people with lower abilities (e.g., Chaplin et al., 2006). For example, Hall, Higgins et al. (2006) reported the experiences of people with intellectual disabilities in mainstream community and inpatient mental health services. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Current policy in UK health services emphasizes that, where possible, people with intellectual disabilities should access the same services as people without intellectual disabilities. One of the barriers to this is the confidence of clinicians and therapists. In this paper, we report on the development of a scale to describe the confidence of therapists in working with people with intellectual disabilities (the Therapy Confidence Scale–Intellectual Disabilities [TCS-ID]). One-hundred and eighty-one therapists who provided talking therapies but who did not work primarily with people with intellectual disabilities completed the scale; 43 people completed the scale twice for test–retest reliability purposes. One-hundred and seven people also completed a scale of general therapy self-efficacy. The TCS-ID has a single factor structure accounting for 62% of the variance, Cronbach's alpha for the scale is 0.93 and test–retest reliability is 0.83. There are significant differences in confidence based upon participants experience in working with people with intellectual disabilities and their therapeutic orientation, and there is a significant association between the TCS-ID and the General Therapy Self-efficacy Scale. Sixty clinicians working in mainstream mental health services received training on adapting their therapeutic approaches to meet the needs of people with intellectual disabilities. The TCS-ID was used pre-training and post-training and demonstrated a significant increase in confidence for all group. We suggest that the scale has good psychometric properties and can be used to develop an understanding of the impact of training for mainstream therapist in working with people with intellectual disabilities. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Key Practitioner MessageThere is increasing emphasis on people with intellectual disabilities receiving services from mainstream mental health services.There is no research describing the experiences and outcomes of people with intellectual disabilities receiving mainstream talking therapy services.The confidence that clinicians have in working with people with intellectual disabilities may be a barrier to them receiving mainstream services.The Therapy Confidence Scale–Intellectual Disabilities is a psychometrically sound scale for measuring the confidence of therapists in working with people with intellectual disabilities and is a useful outcome measure for training clinicians to work with people with intellectual disabilities.
    Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy 05/2014; DOI:10.1002/cpp.1898 · 2.59 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: modern neurodiagnostic technologies and improved research methodologies have led to increasing support for the concept of schizophrenia as a neurobehavioral disorder / in this chapter we provide an update (through 1990) of research findings in this rapidly changing field by selectively reviewing a broad literature on brain–behavior relationships in schizophrenia / these research data are interwoven with our clinical experience to help the reader understand and treat the individual schizophrenic patient / our review of neurodiagnostic laboratory studies and neuropathological data indicates that limbic-diencephalic, prefrontal and temporal lobe neocortical regions are the most common sites of structural and physiological dysfunction description of the disorder / conducting the neuropsychological examination / formal testing / typical neuropsychological findings / differential diagnosis / specific recommendations based upon neuropsychological evaluation / typical case studies (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The trends of specific technologies and their likely impact on navigation systems used in transportation during the next 25 years are described. Particular emphasis is placed on the Canadian situation. The research will contribute to Transport Canada objectives of exploring strategic technologies, fostering transportation research at universities, and promoting dialogue on long-term transportation technological developments. The following areas are discussed: inertial and satellite navigation systems, RF hardware technologies, computer technology, mobile digital communications, and prototypes and emerging systems
    Vehicle Navigation and Information Systems Conference, 1989. Conference Record; 10/1989
Show more