Rechallenge with clozapine following leucopenia or neutropenia during previous therapy

Histopathology Department, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Infirmary Square, Leicester LE1 5WW, UK.
The British Journal of Psychiatry (Impact Factor: 7.34). 03/2006; 188:255-63. DOI: 10.1192/bjp.188.3.255
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Further treatment with clozapine is contraindicated in any patient who has previously experienced leucopenia or neutropenia during clozapine therapy.
To investigate the results of such a rechallenge in 53 patients.
An analysis was made of the demographic, haematological and outcome data of patients in the UK and Ireland who were rechallenged with clozapine following leucopenia or neutropenia during previous clozapine therapy.
Of 53 patients who were rechallenged, 20 (38%) experienced a further blood dyscrasia. In 17 of these 20 patients (85%) the second blood dyscrasia was more severe (P<0.001), in 12 (60%) it lasted longer (P=0.0368) and in 17 (85%) it occurred more quickly on rechallenge (P<0.001). Of the original 53 patients, 55% (29 patients) are still receiving clozapine.
No clear risk factor for repeat blood dyscrasias was identified. Despite this, after risks and benefits have been considered, rechallenge may well be justified in some patients.

Download full-text


Available from: Louisa Dunk, Jan 06, 2014
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The atypical antipsychotic clozapine is very effective for treatment of schizophrenia, but it causes agranulocytosis requiring drug cessation in up to 2% of cases. There has been some success rechallenging with clozapine at a later date or giving granulocyte colony stimulating factor or lithium while continuing clozapine. However, there are still some patients for whom these strategies do not work yet who cannot be controlled on other medications. This paper proposes that for such individuals, cerebroventricular administration of clozapine via Ommaya catheters could allow continued use of clozapine therapy. Direct infusion into cerebrospinal fluid means far smaller amounts of drug would be needed for efficacy, and clozapine concentrates in the central nervous system where it would not be exposed to bone marrow stem cells to cause agranulocytosis. This treatment paradigm would also provide a means for court-ordered clozapine therapy and a possible delivery system for future therapeutics based on trophic factors such as brain-derived neurotrophic factor.
    Medical Hypotheses 07/2012; 79(4):497-9. DOI:10.1016/j.mehy.2012.06.033 · 1.15 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Clozapine is widely prescribed for treatment refractory patients with schizophrenia, but its use is limited by potentially life threatening adverse effects. Rechallenge after these complications has been occasionally attempted in patients with severe psychotic symptoms. To review the outcome of clozapine rechallenge after potentially life threatening adverse effects. Electronic, all-language, literature search (1972-2011) followed by demographic and clinical data extraction. The outcome of rechallenge was considered favorable when the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the proportion of patients who could continue clozapine was >50%. Altogether, 138 patients (mean age: 36.3years, 65.7% male, 57.6% Caucasian, virtually all with schizophrenia spectrum diagnosis) underwent clozapine rechallenge after developing neutropenia (n=112), agranulocytosis (n=15), neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) (n=5), myocarditis (n=4), pericarditis (n=1) and lupus erythematosus (n=1). Rechallenge strategies were heterogeneous and not systematically evaluated. Clozapine rechallenge was successful in 78/112 patients (69.6%, CI: 60.6-77.4) after neutropenia, 3/15 (20%, CI: 7.1-45.2) after agranulocytosis, 5/5 (100%, CI: 56-100) after NMS, 3/4 (75%, CI: 30-95) after myocarditis, 1/1 after pericarditis, and 0/1 after clozapine-induced lupus. Successfully rechallenged patients were followed for 16-96weeks. None of the rechallenged patients died. Although controlled studies are clearly needed, using a priori, confidence interval-based criteria, case reports/series suggest that in refractory patients who benefited from clozapine, careful rechallenge can be considered after neutropenia and NMS, but not after agranulocytosis and myocarditis.
    Schizophrenia Research 11/2011; 134(2-3):180-6. DOI:10.1016/j.schres.2011.10.014 · 4.43 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Clozapine, a dibenzodiazepine antipsychotic, is the most effective medication for treatment-resistant schizophrenia. However, its use has been limited by the high risk of neutropenia. In children, the rate of neutropenia is higher when compared to adults. We decided to explore the use of lithium to manage neutropenia in childhood-onset schizophrenia (COS) through a systematic audit of COS cases. Medical records were reviewed for patients with COS who had been treated with the combination of clozapine and lithium carbonate. Seven patients were found to have been treated with both clozapine and lithium. After initiation of lithium, ANC increased significantly in six out of seven subjects by 29 to 106% with a mean of 66%. In addition, six out of seven subjects continued using both clozapine and lithium for over 2 years (range: 2.0-7.2 years) and do not have immediate plans for discontinuation of either medications. Our study bolsters support for the use of lithium in the management of neutropenia in children treated with clozapine. Although the coadministration of lithium and clozapine appears effective in the management of neutropenia, it is not without its risks and clinicians must be diligent in their joint use of these medications.
    Human Psychopharmacology Clinical and Experimental 10/2009; 24(7):584-9. DOI:10.1002/hup.1056 · 1.85 Impact Factor