Long-term follow-up after limb salvage in skeletally immature children with a primary malignant tumor of the distal end of the femur.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hyogo College of Medicine, 1-1 Mukogawa Nishinomiya, Hyogo 663-8501, Japan.
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (Impact Factor: 3.23). 04/2006; 88(3):595-603. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.C.01686
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Skeletally immature children with a primary malignant tumor in the distal end of the femur are candidates for limb-salvage surgery; however, functional impairment due to subsequent limb-length discrepancy must be considered. Our aim was to evaluate the long-term clinical outcome of limb salvage in patients with a sarcoma of the distal end of the femur who were eleven years old or less, focusing on limb-length discrepancy and complications.
The cases of forty children were retrospectively reviewed in a multicenter study based on the responses to a questionnaire. Twenty-eight patients had had endoprosthetic reconstruction, and twelve had had biological reconstruction. Functional evaluation was based on the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society scoring system, with numerical values from 0 to 5 points assigned for each of the following six categories: pain, function, emotional acceptance, use of supports, walking ability, and gait. These values were added, and the functional score was presented as a percentage of the maximum possible score. Limb-length discrepancy was measured with orthoroentgenograms. Complications and their treatment were analyzed. Patient survival and the survival of the reconstructions were analyzed with use of the Kaplan-Meier method.
Seven patients died and thirty-three remained alive, for a survival rate of 82% at ten years postoperatively. For the surviving patients, the mean follow-up periods (and standard deviations) were similar for the twenty-two who had endoprosthetic reconstruction (13.2 +/- 3.9 years) and the eleven who had biological reconstruction (10.4 +/- 4.4 years). All patients had reached skeletal maturity. The mean final functional score was 74% +/- 18% in the endoprosthetic reconstruction group and 68% +/- 17% in the biological reconstruction group (p = 0.37). For the nineteen patients who underwent limb-lengthening, the mean functional score increased significantly from 65% +/- 21% before the procedure to 81% +/- 11% after the lengthening (p = 0.0016). There were five early and twenty-eight late complications. In the endoprosthetic reconstruction group, the most frequent complications were deep infection and aseptic loosening. In the biological reconstruction group, the most frequent complications were implant breakage and nonunion. Revision surgeries were required in seventeen patients, including five who had an amputation. The rate of survival of the endoprosthetic reconstructions was 77% at five years and 51% at ten years postoperatively, whereas the rate of survival of the biological reconstructions was 46% at both five and ten years postoperatively.
Endoprosthetic or biological reconstructions as limb salvage provided good functional outcome in skeletally immature children with a malignant bone tumor of the distal aspect of the femur despite a high rate of revisions and limb-lengthening procedures.

1 Bookmark
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose of the studyImproved oncologic outcome and technical advances in limb salvage surgery have made limb salvage therapy a feasible and valuable treatment option. Nevertheless, resection of a bone tumor followed by a reconstruction knee endoprosthesis can create gait abnormalities, of which one of the most frequent is knee stiffness. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the outcomes of revision surgery for a stiff knee following reconstruction of a segmental long bone defect.Patients and methodsBetween 1983 and 2005, 19 patients who had undergone wide resection of a tumor close to the knee followed by reconstruction with a massive endoprosthesis were revised for a diagnosis of stiffness.ResultsThe mean age of the patients was 12 years (range: 7–19 years). Patients were followed for a mean five years (range: 1–21 years). Three patients were not assessed at the last follow up (two patients died, one patient was amputated for a local recurrence). The mean range of motion improved 80 ± 24° preoperatively to postoperatively. The Enneking score improved from 15 ± 0.5 to 23 ± 3 points at three months follow-up, and to 22 ± 5 at last follow-up. Recurrent stiffness occurred three times and required a second operative release with a good final result.DiscussionOutcome depends on the cause of the stiffness of the reconstruction knee arthroplasty. Stiffness can be caused by complications (trauma, implant failure, infection), and patient-related factors (lack of physiotherapy). Open arthrolysis is indicated for chronic stiffness in a motivated patient with an identified cause because failure to identify the cause of stiffness may result in recurrence of the problem.
    Revue de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Réparatrice de l'Appareil Moteur. 01/2008; 94(3):268-272.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVES: To evaluate ambulatory activity differences between youth with limb salvage procedures and typically developing youth (TDY) and assess differences in self-reported activity levels in the 2 groups, to provide a basis for physical activity assessment in patients who had undergone limb salvage surgery and treatment planning that incorporates regaining normal physical and daily living activities. STUDY DESIGN: In this cohort comparison study, we compared ambulatory and self-reported activity levels in 20 youth (aged 11.7-20.8 years) who had undergone limb salvage surgery and a sex- and age-matched comparison cohort of 20 TDY. StepWatch activity monitor and Activity Scale for Kids data were used to answer these questions. RESULTS: Significant differences were found between the youth who had undergone limb salvage surgery and the TDY in total time active each day (43% vs 48%; P = .03), median total strides per day (4487 vs 7671; P = .001), and amount of time per day at high activity levels (20 minutes vs 47 minutes; P = .001). Self-reported overall physical activity, locomotion, and standing Activity Scale for Kids subscale scores were significantly lower in the youth undergoing limb salvage surgery compared with the TDY (summary score, 88.3 vs 97.7; P = .001). CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing limb salvage surgery exhibit reduced physical activity compared with normal age-matched controls.
    The Journal of pediatrics 08/2012; · 4.02 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Small recent case series using CT-based navigation suggest such approaches may aid in surgical planning and improve accuracy of intended resections, but the accuracy and clinical use have not been confirmed. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We therefore evaluated (1) the accuracy; (2) recurrences; and (3) function in patients treated by computer-assisted tumor surgery (CATS). METHODS: From 2006 to 2009, we performed CATS in 20 patients with 21 malignant tumors. The mean age was 31 years (range, 6-80 years). CT and MR images for 18 cases were fused using the navigation software. Reconstructed two-dimensional/three-dimensional images were used to plan the bone resection. The achieved bone resection was compared with the planned one by assessing margins, dimensions at the level of bone resection, or fitting of CAD custom prostheses. Function was assessed with the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score. The minimum followup was 31 months (mean, 39 months; range, 5-69 months). Results Histological examination of all resected specimens showed a clear tumor margin. The achieved bone resection matched the planned with a difference of ≤ 2 mm. The achieved positions of custom prostheses were comparable to the planned positions when merging postoperative with preoperative CT images in five cases. Three of the four patients with local recurrence had tumors at the sacral region. The mean MSTS score was 28 (range, 23-30). CONCLUSION: CATS with image fusion allows accurate execution of the intended bone resection. It may be beneficial to resection and reconstruction in pelvic, sacral tumors and more difficult joint-preserving intercalated tumor surgery. Comparative clinical studies with long-term followup are necessary to confirm its efficacy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
    Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 09/2012; · 2.79 Impact Factor


Available from