Long-term follow-up after limb salvage in skeletally immature children with a primary malignant tumor of the distal end of the femur.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hyogo College of Medicine, 1-1 Mukogawa Nishinomiya, Hyogo 663-8501, Japan.
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (Impact Factor: 3.23). 04/2006; 88(3):595-603. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.C.01686
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Skeletally immature children with a primary malignant tumor in the distal end of the femur are candidates for limb-salvage surgery; however, functional impairment due to subsequent limb-length discrepancy must be considered. Our aim was to evaluate the long-term clinical outcome of limb salvage in patients with a sarcoma of the distal end of the femur who were eleven years old or less, focusing on limb-length discrepancy and complications.
The cases of forty children were retrospectively reviewed in a multicenter study based on the responses to a questionnaire. Twenty-eight patients had had endoprosthetic reconstruction, and twelve had had biological reconstruction. Functional evaluation was based on the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society scoring system, with numerical values from 0 to 5 points assigned for each of the following six categories: pain, function, emotional acceptance, use of supports, walking ability, and gait. These values were added, and the functional score was presented as a percentage of the maximum possible score. Limb-length discrepancy was measured with orthoroentgenograms. Complications and their treatment were analyzed. Patient survival and the survival of the reconstructions were analyzed with use of the Kaplan-Meier method.
Seven patients died and thirty-three remained alive, for a survival rate of 82% at ten years postoperatively. For the surviving patients, the mean follow-up periods (and standard deviations) were similar for the twenty-two who had endoprosthetic reconstruction (13.2 +/- 3.9 years) and the eleven who had biological reconstruction (10.4 +/- 4.4 years). All patients had reached skeletal maturity. The mean final functional score was 74% +/- 18% in the endoprosthetic reconstruction group and 68% +/- 17% in the biological reconstruction group (p = 0.37). For the nineteen patients who underwent limb-lengthening, the mean functional score increased significantly from 65% +/- 21% before the procedure to 81% +/- 11% after the lengthening (p = 0.0016). There were five early and twenty-eight late complications. In the endoprosthetic reconstruction group, the most frequent complications were deep infection and aseptic loosening. In the biological reconstruction group, the most frequent complications were implant breakage and nonunion. Revision surgeries were required in seventeen patients, including five who had an amputation. The rate of survival of the endoprosthetic reconstructions was 77% at five years and 51% at ten years postoperatively, whereas the rate of survival of the biological reconstructions was 46% at both five and ten years postoperatively.
Endoprosthetic or biological reconstructions as limb salvage provided good functional outcome in skeletally immature children with a malignant bone tumor of the distal aspect of the femur despite a high rate of revisions and limb-lengthening procedures.

1 Bookmark
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Endoprosthetic reconstruction after resection of a primary bone malignancy has become an established surgical modality that preserves the limb without compromising oncologic survival. Tumours arising from the proximal tibia and distal femur pose a unique set of challenges in the management of soft tissues and the restoration of limb length and joint kinetics. These issues are especially complex in the skeletally immature patient. The focus of this article is to review recent innovations in modern endoprosthetic design, with a focus on outcomes and treatment of surgical complications such as infection, aseptic loosening and extensor mechanism failure. We also review functional outcomes across various types of endoprosthetic designs.
    Current Surgery Reports. 01/2014;
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:: Expandable prostheses offer the advantages of limb-salvage and limb-length equality at skeletal maturity. However, what is the cost for achieving that goal, and in how many children this is achieved? MATERIALS AND METHODS:: We present 32 children (16 boys and 16 girls; mean age, 9 y) with bone sarcomas of the femur treated with limb salvage using expandable prostheses. The Kotz Growing prosthesis and the noninvasive Repiphysis and Stanmore expandable prostheses were used. The mean follow-up was 49 months. Survival analysis of the children and primary implants and functional evaluation were performed. RESULTS:: Survival of the children was 94% and 84% at 48 and 72 months. Survival of the primary prostheses was 78% and 66% at 48 and 72 months; survival was significantly higher only for the Kotz when compared with the Repiphysis prostheses (P=0.026). The rate of implant-related complications was 51.3%; 9 prostheses (23%) were revised because of aseptic loosening, infection, and breakage. A mean total lengthening of 28 mm (4 to 165 mm) was achieved by 84 procedures (2.6 procedures/patient). Three of the 9 children who reached skeletal maturity had limb-length equality and 6 discrepancy of 15 to 30 mm. The mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score was excellent (79%) without a significant difference between the type of prostheses (P=0.934). CONCLUSIONS:: The Kotz Growing prosthesis, although it requires an open lengthening procedure, has shown higher survival when compared with the noninvasive Repiphysis prosthesis. However, the total lengthening remains small, and the complications rates are high even with the noninvasive prostheses.
    Journal of pediatric orthopedics 04/2013; 33(3):244-253. · 1.23 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia 02/2009; 44(1):46-51.


Available from