Simulation of pediatric trauma stabilization in 35 North Carolina emergency departments: Identification of targets for performance improvement

Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States
PEDIATRICS (Impact Factor: 5.3). 04/2006; 117(3):641-8. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2004-2702
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Trauma is the leading cause of death in children. Most children present to community hospital emergency departments (EDs) for initial stabilization. Thus, all EDs must be prepared to care for injured children. The objectives of this study were to (1) characterize the quality of trauma stabilization efforts in EDs and (2) identify targets for educational interventions.
This was a prospective observational study of simulated trauma stabilizations, that is, "mock codes," at 35 North Carolina EDs. An evaluation tool was created to score each mock code on 44 stabilization tasks. Primary outcomes were (1) interrater reliability of tool, (2) overall performance by each ED, and (3) performance per stabilization task.
Evaluation-tool interrater reliability was excellent. The median number of stabilization tasks that needed improvement by the EDs was 25 (57%) of 44 tasks. Although problems were numerous and varied, many EDs need improvement in tasks uniquely important and/or complicated in pediatric resuscitations, including (1) estimating a child's weight (17 of 35 EDs [49%]), (2) preparing for intraosseous needle placement (24 of 35 [69%]), (3) ordering intravenous fluid boluses (31 of 35 [89%]), (4) applying warming measures (34 of 35 [97%]), and (5) ordering dextrose for hypoglycemia (34 of 35 [97%]).
This study used simulation to identify deficiencies in stabilization of children presenting to EDs, revealing that mistakes are ubiquitous. ED personnel were universally receptive to feedback. Future research should investigate whether interventions aimed at improving identified deficiencies can improve trauma stabilization performance and, ultimately, the outcomes of children who present to EDs.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Outcomes from pediatric cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) seem to be incrementally improving. The past 2 decades have brought advances in the understanding of the pathophysiology of cardiac arrest and ventricular fibrillation, better treatment strategies, and a more robust standard for CPR epidemiology and research reporting. The evolution of practice based on an improved understanding of the pathophysiology and timing, intensity, duration, and variability of the hypoxic-ischemic insult should lead to goal-directed therapy gated to the phase of cardiac arrest and the postarrest period encountered. By strategically focusing therapies to specific phases of cardiac arrest and resuscitation and to the evolving pathophysiology and by implementing evidence-based practice, there is great promise that critical care interventions can lead the way to more successful cardiopulmonary and cerebral resuscitation in children.
    Pediatric Clinics of North America 09/2008; 55(4):1051-64, xii. DOI:10.1016/j.pcl.2008.04.013 · 2.20 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Traditional medical education has emphasized autonomy, and until recently issues related to teamwork have not been explicitly included in medical curriculum. The Institute of Medicine highlighted that health care providers train as individuals, yet function as teams, creating a gap between training and reality and called for the use of medical simulation to improve teamwork. The aviation industry created a program called Cockpit and later Crew Resource Management that has served as a model for team training programs in medicine. This article reviews important concepts related to teamwork and discusses examples where simulation either could be or has been used to improve teamwork in medical disciplines to enhance patient safety.
    Anesthesiology Clinics 07/2007; 25(2):301-19. DOI:10.1016/j.anclin.2007.03.004
  • Journal of nursing care quality 23(3):189-94. DOI:10.1097/01.NCQ.0000324580.82428.70 · 1.09 Impact Factor