A prospective, double-blind phase II study evaluating the safety and efficacy of a topical histamine gel for the prophylaxis of oral mucositis in patients post hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Department of Oral Medicine, The Hebrew University-Hadassah School of Dental Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel.
Bone Marrow Transplantation (Impact Factor: 3.57). 05/2006; 37(8):757-62. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1705331
Source: PubMed


The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety, tolerability and efficacy of a topical gel containing histamine dihydrochloride (HDC) versus a placebo gel in preventing oral mucositis in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) patients. A total of 45 patients post-HSCT were enrolled in a prospective longitudinal, placebo-controlled, double-blind study. Patients were evaluated twice weekly for oral mucositis (OMAS, NCI score), oral pain (VAS), oral function and salivary flow rate. Compliance was assessed using a patient diary. Oral mucositis developed in 85% of the HDC group and 63% of the placebo group. The mean maximal intensity for NCI score was 1.45+/-1 in the HDC group and 1.21+/-1.27 in the placebo group (P=0.37). The mean duration of oral mucositis was 4.7+/-3.6 and 2.33+/-2.23 days in the HDC and placebo groups, respectively (P=0.06). The same trends were measured with OMAS. Visual analogue scale for oral pain and oral function was not significantly different between the two groups. Histamine dihydrochloride was found to be safe. In the search for topical agents for the prevention of mucositis, we found that HDC neither improves nor worsens oral mucositis in HSCT patients. The balance between the pro- and anti-inflammatory effects of HDC should be investigated further in order to acquire a clinically effective topical medication based on its anti-inflammatory properties.

Download full-text


Available from: Igor Resnick, Jul 16, 2014
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background The aim of this study was to review the available literature and define clinical practice guidelines for the use of laser and other light therapies for the prevention and treatment of oral mucositis. Methods A systematic review was conducted by the Mucositis Study Group of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer/International Society of Oral Oncology. The body of evidence for each intervention, in each cancer treatment setting, was assigned an evidence level. Based on the evidence level, one of the following three guideline determinations was possible: recommendation, suggestion, and no guideline possible. Results A new recommendation was made for low-level laser (wavelength at 650 nm, power of 40 mW, and each square centimeter treated with the required time to a tissue energy dose of 2 J/cm2 (2 s/point)) for the prevention of oral mucositis in adult patients receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplantation conditioned with high-dose chemotherapy, with or without total body irradiation. A new suggestion was made for low-level laser (wavelength around 632.8 nm) for the prevention of oral mucositis in patients undergoing radiotherapy, without concomitant chemotherapy, for head and neck cancer. No guideline was possible in other populations and for other light sources due to insufficient evidence. Conclusions The increasing evidence in favor of low-level laser therapy allowed for the development of two new guidelines supporting this modality in the populations listed above. Evidence for other populations was also generally encouraging over a range of wavelengths and intensities. However, additional well-designed research is needed to evaluate the efficacy of laser and other light therapies in various cancer treatment settings.
    Supportive Care Cancer 09/2012; 21(1). DOI:10.1007/s00520-012-1605-6 · 2.36 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Mucosal barrier injury (mucositis) is a common complication of many treatments used in hematologic malignancies, affecting most patients whose neoplasms are treated with intensive chemotherapy, and virtually all those receiving myeloablative conditioning regimens prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Mucositis has been identified as a critical risk factor for infections and is a major driver of analgesic and total parenteral nutrition use. Patients with this complication require careful analgesic therapy, additional nursing care and longer hospitalization. To date, the measures to prevent and treat this potentially devastating complication are inadequate and limited to the control of pain, infections, bleeding and nutrition. Nevertheless, in the last decade, a better insight into the pathogenesis of the mucosal damage has led to the development of novel therapeutic options which potentially could allow a targeted approach to mucositis.
    Haematologica 03/2007; 92(2):222-31. DOI:10.3324/haematol.10232 · 5.81 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Oral mucositis (OM) is one of the most debilitating and common side effects in patients treated with high-dose chemotherapy supported by haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). We tested the effectiveness of palifermin to avoid oral mucosal injury induced by the conditioning regimen. Twenty patients with haematological malignancies were treated with palifermin for prevention of OM during HSCT procedures. Nine patients received allogeneic haematopoietic stem cells, and in 11 autologous HSCT was performed. The control group was composed of patients who had been treated with HSCT previously, before the palifermin era. The source of graft was peripheral blood. Among patients treated with palifermin no grade 2-4 OM was observed. No patient had to receive opioid analgesics or total parenteral nutrition. 30% of the patients developed grade 1 OM of 4-5 days' duration. In the control group OM was observed in all cases, with 50% of the patients developing grade 3-4 OM. Median duration of OM was 10 and 12 days for auto- and allogeneic patients, respectively. In comparison with the control group, treatment with palifermin was associated with significant reduction of grade 2-4 OM, shorter duration of OM, less analgesics intake, and reduced number of days with antibiotic treatment. Additionally, allogeneic patients treated with palifermin had shorter time to platelet engraftment. Palifermin reduces incidence, severity and duration of OM, and decreases the number of days with analgesics and antibiotics. For allogeneic patients it can shorten the time to platelet engraftment, but this observation needs further studies.
    Journal of B.U.ON.: official journal of the Balkan Union of Oncology 10/2007; 12(4):477-82. · 0.74 Impact Factor
Show more