Anxiolytics, sedatives, antidepressants, neuroleptics and the risk of fracture.

Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism C, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus Sygehus, Tage Hansens Gade 2, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark.
Osteoporosis International (Impact Factor: 4.17). 05/2006; 17(6):807-16. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-005-0065-y
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Our objective was to study the association between fracture risk and the use of anxiolytics and sedatives (benzodiazepines, etc.), neuroleptics and antidepressants.
This was a case control study. All cases consisted of subjects who had sustained a fracture during the year 2000 (n=124,655). For each case, three controls (n=373,962) matched for age and gender were randomly drawn from the background population. Exposure was defined as the use of neuroleptics, antidepressants and anxiolytics/sedatives, psychiatric disease (manic depressive states, schizophrenia, other psychoses), and other confounders. The effect of dose was examined as a defined daily dose per day (DDD/day). The values referred to are confounder-adjusted.
For anxiolytics and sedatives, there was a small increase in overall fracture risk (OR: around 1.1) even with limited doses (<0.1 DDD/day). No dose-response relationship was observed for anxiolytics and sedatives. For neuroleptics, a limited increase in overall fracture risk was observed (OR: around 1.2 from <0.05 DDD/day with no dose-response relationship). For antidepressants, a dose-response relationship was observed for fracture risk (OR: increasing from 1.15, 95% CI: 1.11-1.19 at <0.15 DDD/day to 1.40, 95% CI: 1.35-1.46 for >or=0.75 DDD/day). The risk of fracture was higher with selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors than with tricyclic antidepressants.
Small increases in fracture risk were seen with the use of anxiolytics and sedatives and neuroleptics without a dose-response relationship. The increase may be linked to an increased risk of falls. For antidepressants, a dose-response relationship was found, with a higher fracture risk for selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors.

Download full-text


Available from: Peter Vestergaard, Jul 06, 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction: We evaluated fracture risk in patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) disease. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (1987-2012). Each patient with CMT was matched with up to 6 patients without a history of CMT. The outcome measure was fractures. Results: The risk of non-osteoporotic fracture was statistically significantly increased, [adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) 1.47, 95% Confidence Interval (CI), 1.01 - 2.14], whereas risk of any and osteoporotic fracture did not reach statistical significance compared with control patients, AHR 1.31 (95% CI; 0.98 - 1.74) and AHR 1.10 (95% CI; 0.69 - 1.74) respectively. Discussion: CMT patients have a 1.5-fold increased risk for non-osteoporotic fracture. Studies with larger numbers of CMT patients and with additional data on CMT subtype, bone mineral density, and functional status should be performed to confirm a true association between CMT and an increased risk of fracture. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
    Muscle & Nerve 12/2014; 50(6). DOI:10.1002/mus.24240 · 2.31 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In a nationwide study using linkage of Danish hospital registers we examined predictors of hip fracture (ICD-10: S72) in 15,431 patients with schizophrenia (ICD-10: F20 or ICD-8: 295) and 3,807,597 population controls. Shorter education, disability pension, lifetime alcohol abuse, somatic co-morbidity, antipsychotics (IRR=1.19; 95% CI 1.15-1.24), antidepressant (IRR=1.18; 95% CI 1.16-1.20), anticholinergics (IRR=1.29; 95% CI 1.22-1.36), benzodiazepines (IRR=1.06; 95% CI 1.04-1.08) and corticosteroids (IRR=1.44; 95% CI 1.36-1.53) were significant predictors. In 556 persons with schizophrenia and hip fracture (matched to 1:3 to schizophrenia controls without hip fracture), antipsychotic polypharmacy predicted hip fracture. Analyses among antipsychotic monotherapy patients showed no differential effect of individual antipsychotics. A dose-response relationship of hip fracture and lifetime antipsychotics consumption was found (IRR=1.13 95% CI 1.07-1.19) and both prolactin-increasing and non-prolactin-increasing antipsychotics contributed to the effect. In conclusion, several factors, including complex psychopharmacological treatment, contribute in the prediction of hip fracture in large populations. Preventive strategies should focus attention to severely ill patients with high likelihood of a receiving complex psychopharmacologic treatment and high doses of antipsychotics.
    European neuropsychopharmacology: the journal of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology 05/2013; DOI:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2013.04.002 · 5.40 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Popular psychotropic drugs, like the antidepressant selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), and the mood stabilizer lithium, may have skeletal effects. In particular, preclinical observations suggest a direct negative effect of SSRIs on the skeleton. A potential caveat in studies of the skeletal effects of psychotropic drugs is the hypoactive (skeletal unloading) phenotype they induce. The aim of this study was to investigate the contribution of physical inactivity to the skeletal effects of psychotropic drugs by studying bone changes in cage control and tail suspended mice treated with either vehicle, SSRI, TCA or lithium. Tail suspension was used to control for drug differences on physical activity levels by normalizing skeletal loading between groups. The psychotropic drugs were found to have contrasting skeletal effects which were independent of drug effects on animal physical activity levels. The latter was evident by an absence of statistical interactions between the activity and drug groups. Pharmacological inhibition of the 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) transporter (5-HTT) using a SSRI reduced in vivo gains in lower extremity BMD, and negatively altered ex vivo measures of femoral and spinal bone density, architecture and mechanical properties. These effects were mediated by a decrease in bone formation without a change in bone resorption suggesting that the SSRI had anti-anabolic skeletal effects. In contrast, glycogen synthase kinase-3[beta] (GSK-3[beta]) inhibition using lithium had anabolic effects improving in vivo gains in BMD via an increase in bone formation, while TCA-mediated inhibition of the norepinephrine transporter had minimal skeletal effect. The observed negative skeletal effect of 5-HTT inhibition, combined with recent findings of direct and indirect effects of 5-HT on bone formation, are of interest given the frequent prescription of SSRIs for the treatment of depression and other affective disorders. Likewise, the anabolic effect of GSK-3[beta] inhibition using lithium reconfirms the importance of Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in the skeleton and it's targeting by recent drug discovery efforts. In conclusion, the current study demonstrates that different psychotropic drugs with differing underlying mechanisms of action have contrasting skeletal effects and that these effects do not result indirectly via the generation of animal physical inactivity.
    Bone 04/2010; 46(4):985-92. DOI:10.1016/j.bone.2009.12.031 · 4.46 Impact Factor