Article

Controlled Delivery of High vs Low Humidity vs Mist Therapy for Croup in Emergency Departments: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario.
JAMA The Journal of the American Medical Association (Impact Factor: 30.39). 04/2006; 295(11):1274-80. DOI: 10.1001/jama.295.11.1274
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Children with croup are often treated with humidity even though this is not scientifically based, consumes time, and can be harmful. Although humidity using the traditional blow-by technique is similar to room air and no water droplets reach the nasopharynx, particles sized for laryngeal deposition (5-10 microm) could be beneficial.
To determine whether a significant difference in the clinical Westley croup score exists in children with moderate to severe croup who were admitted to the emergency department and who received either 100% humidity or 40% humidity via nebulizer or blow-by humidity.
A randomized, single-blind, controlled trial conducted between 2001 and 2004 in a tertiary care pediatric emergency department.
A convenience sample of 140 previously healthy children 3 months to 10 years of age with Westley croup score of more than 1 or 2 or higher (scoring system range, 0-17); 21 families refused participation.
Thirty-minute administration of humidity using traditional blow-by technique (commonly used placebo, n = 48), controlled delivery of 40% humidity (optimally delivered placebo, n = 46), or 100% humidity (n = 46) with water particles of mass median diameter 6.21 microm.
A priori defined change in the Westley croup score from baseline to 30 and 60 minutes in the 3 groups.
Groups were comparable before treatment. At 30 minutes the difference in the improvement in the croup score between the blow-by and low-humidity groups was 0.03 (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.72 to 0.66), between low- and high-humidity groups, 0.16 (95% CI, -0.86 to 0.53), and between blow-by and high-humidity groups, 0.19 (95% CI, -0.87 to 0.49). Results were similar at 60 minutes. Differences between groups in pulse and respiratory rates and oxygen saturation changes were insignificant, as were proportions of excellent responders; proportions with croup score of 0 at study conclusion; and proportions receiving dexamethasone, epinephrine, or requiring additional medical care or hospitalization.
One hundred percent humidity with particles specifically sized to deposit in the larynx failed to result in greater improvement than 40% humidity or humidity by blow-by technique. This study does not support the use of humidity for moderate croup for patients treated in the emergency department.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00230841.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Derek Stephens, Aug 26, 2015
1 Follower
 · 
210 Views
  • Source
    • "Nevertheless, Neto and colleagues [26] described that mist therapy was not effective in improving clinical symptoms in children presenting to the emergency department with moderate croup. More recently, Scolnik and colleagues [27] found that even 100% humidity was not more effective when compared with mist therapy in the treatment of moderate croup. Because these treatments are harmless, many practitioners still use Fig. 1. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Pediatric respiratory infections are a common presenting complaint to the emergency department. This article discusses the presentation and management of infectious conditions, including bacterial tracheitis, bronchiolitis, croup, epiglottitis, pertussis, pneumonia, and retropharyngeal abscess.
    Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America 12/2007; 25(4):961-79, vi. DOI:10.1016/j.emc.2007.07.006 · 0.85 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This chapter reviews published studies in the field of pediatric therapeutics between July 1998 and July 2000. The most important area discussed in the first part of the chapter concerns the significant advances made in the labeling of drugs for children in the United States. Dr Harry Shirkey coined the term "therapeutic orphan" in 1968 to describe the state of children who were not being considered in either drug development or in drug clinical trials. This explains why about 80% of drugs listed in each edition of the Physicians' Desk Reference do not have labeling for the pediatric age group, especially children younger than 12 years. The recent legislative, regulatory, and pharmaceutical company activities to change this situation are summarized. These changes are current and promise to make significant contributions to the availability of drugs with adequate pediatric indications to the practicing physician. Another important change in recent years has been the appreciation of the importance of placebo-controlled clinical trials for psychotropic medications in children. Trials with one of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, as well as further studies involving the appropriate dosing and preparation of stimulant drugs for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), are also discussed. Several new areas that promise significant knowledge in therapeutics are in the treatment of osteoporosis (a neglected condition in pediatrics), arthritis (a condition for which drugs are used to treat the disease rather than the symptoms), and acquisition of data concerning transplacental transfer of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and use of multiple anti-HIV drugs for treatment of this virus in the pediatric population.
    Advances in Pediatrics 02/2001; 48:439-64.
  • JAMA The Journal of the American Medical Association 08/2006; 296(4):393-4; author reply 394. DOI:10.1001/jama.296.4.393-b · 30.39 Impact Factor
Show more