Article

Monitoring for adverse drug reactions.

West Midlands Centre for Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting, City Hospital, London, UK.
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (Impact Factor: 3.69). 05/2006; 61(4):371-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2006.02596.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Monitoring describes the prospective supervision, observation, and testing of an ongoing process. The result of monitoring provides reassurance that the goal has been or will be achieved, or suggests changes that will allow it to be achieved. In therapeutics, most thought has been given to Therapeutic Drug Monitoring, that is, monitoring of drug concentrations to achieve benefit or avoid harm, or both. Patients and their clinicians can also monitor the progress of a disease, and adjust treatment accordingly, for example, to achieve optimum glycaemic control. Very little consideration has been given to the development of effective schemes for monitoring for the occurrence of adverse effects, such as biochemical or haematological disturbance. Significant harm may go undetected in controlled clinical trials. Even where harm is detected, published details of trials are usually insufficient to allow a practical monitoring scheme to be introduced. The result is that information available to prescribers, such as the Summary of Product Characteristics, frequently provides advice that is incomplete or impossible to follow. We discuss here the elements of logical schemes for monitoring for adverse drug reactions, and the possible contributions that computerized decision support can make. We should require evidence that if a monitoring scheme is proposed, it can be put into practice, will prove effective, and is affordable.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
138 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Many drugs, when licensed, list a requirement for monitoring during treatment. Frequently, the information is vague and the adherence of the prescriber and patient to the monitoring regimen is variable and often poor. There is a need for rational monitoring schemes that clinicians can adhere to and that protect patients.
    Adverse Drug Reaction Bulletin 03/2010;
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: AIM: This paper reports on the development of an instrument for nurse-led medication monitoring, the West Wales Adverse Drug Reaction profile for respiratory medicines, as part of a strategy to reduce avoidable adverse drug reactions. BACKGROUND: Preventable adverse drug reactions account for 3.7% hospital admissions. Nurse-led medication monitoring may reduce drug-related harm. However, development of medication monitoring strategies is not reported elsewhere. METHODS: The profile was developed by: (1) cognitive interviews (n = 4), (2) the content validity index (n = 10) involving academics, clinicians and service users prescribed respiratory medicines, (3) inter-rater reliability (n = 48) and clinical gains in a nurse-led outpatient clinic. RESULTS: Cognitive interviews prompted more profile changes than either the content validity index or inter-rater reliability testing. Cohen's κ for inter-rater reliability for each item ranged from 0.73-1.00 (good to complete agreement). The profile identified previously unsuspected problems in all participants, including muscular weakness, skin and mouth problems. CONCLUSIONS: The West Wales Adverse Drug Reaction profile was valid and reliable, and helped to detect and ameliorate drug-related harm. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: The West Wales Adverse Drug Reaction profile offers opportunities to improve care. Medication monitoring provides the structure to concurrently monitor known adverse drug reactions. Practice-based adverse drug reaction profiles benefit from cognitive, content validity and inter-rater reliability testing.
    Journal of Nursing Management 05/2013; · 1.45 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Drug-induced liver injury has been associated with more than 800 different drugs, leading to hospital admission in 1 of 600 to 3500 admissions. This amounts to 2 to 3% of all hospitalisations due to adverse drug reactions, or about 3% of all jaundiced patients. The prognosis of clinically overt drug hepatotoxicity is relatively serious. The clinical picture is essentially nonspecific, with a highly variable latency period from days to years. Drug hepatotoxicity can mimic almost any kind of liver disease. A thorough drug history, a low threshold of suspicion and the exclusion of other causes of liver disease are important for the detection of drug-induced liver disorders. Treatment consists of discontinuation of suspected drug(s), acetylcysteine in the course of paracetamol (acetaminophen) toxicity, and liver transplantation in selected cases of fulminant liver failure. Guidelines regarding the use of selected drugs such as methotrexate and halothane should be followed. Potentially hepatotoxic drugs should be used cautiously in alcoholic patients with or without liver involvement. Patients with uncompensated liver disease should receive a reduced dose of drugs adjusted to the degree of liver function impairment. The general public should be warned against abuse of hepatotoxic drugs such as paracetamol and anabolic steroids.
    Drug Safety 03/1994; 10(3). · 2.62 Impact Factor

Full-text (3 Sources)

Download
44 Downloads
Available from
May 20, 2014