Monitoring for adverse drug reactions

University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England, United Kingdom
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (Impact Factor: 3.88). 05/2006; 61(4):371-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2006.02596.x
Source: PubMed


Monitoring describes the prospective supervision, observation, and testing of an ongoing process. The result of monitoring provides reassurance that the goal has been or will be achieved, or suggests changes that will allow it to be achieved. In therapeutics, most thought has been given to Therapeutic Drug Monitoring, that is, monitoring of drug concentrations to achieve benefit or avoid harm, or both. Patients and their clinicians can also monitor the progress of a disease, and adjust treatment accordingly, for example, to achieve optimum glycaemic control. Very little consideration has been given to the development of effective schemes for monitoring for the occurrence of adverse effects, such as biochemical or haematological disturbance. Significant harm may go undetected in controlled clinical trials. Even where harm is detected, published details of trials are usually insufficient to allow a practical monitoring scheme to be introduced. The result is that information available to prescribers, such as the Summary of Product Characteristics, frequently provides advice that is incomplete or impossible to follow. We discuss here the elements of logical schemes for monitoring for adverse drug reactions, and the possible contributions that computerized decision support can make. We should require evidence that if a monitoring scheme is proposed, it can be put into practice, will prove effective, and is affordable.


Available from: Jamie J Coleman
  • Source
    • "ONITORING describes a process in which a time varying system will be controlled and includes prospective supervision, proactive and targeted observation, testing of an ongoing process, analysis and action. In the process, monitoring examines if a desired system status has been or will be achieved, otherwise it suggests changes to the system to obtain this status [1]. Due to recent advances in technology extensive cardiovascular monitoring is widely available today. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Due to recent advances in technology extensive cardiovascular monitoring is widely introduced today. An essential component of cardiovascular monitoring is the analysis of several biosignals as electrocardiogram, blood pressure and other vital signs. This manuscript provides an overview about several application fields of cardiovascular monitoring with the main focus on nonlinear dynamics analysis.
    Conference proceedings: ... Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Conference 08/2011; 2011:6564-7. DOI:10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6091619
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Of 817 patients in a general-practice survey of adverse reactions to drugs, 41% were thought to have "certainly" or "probably" had a reaction to the drug prescribed. Adverse effects on the gastrointestinal and central nervous systems were the most frequently reported, and 90% of reactions had occurred by the fourth day of treatment. More patients given drugs acting on the central nervous system and antihistamines reported reactions than those in other categories. A higher incidence of adverse drug effects is shown in this general-practice survey than in other, mainly hospital-based, surveys. Further intensive surveillance for adverse effects of drugs is recommended to provide additional information on the burden of drug-induced disease in the community.
    British medical journal 12/1979; 2(6199):1194-7. DOI:10.1136/bmj.2.6199.1194
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In a general practice in Derbyshire 298 patients who had been given antibiotics were questioned about possible adverse reactions to the drug prescribed. Four methods of assessing adverse effects of drugs in the community were used, and a comparison was made of the replies elicited from patients by doctor and health visitor respectively. Significant differences were shown to occur in the way in which each investigator completed the questionnaires. If ancillary staff are to be employed in monitoring adverse effects of drugs in the community on a large scale then they will have to use a method less reliant on the differentiation of incidental symptoms from drug side effects than is required in the present survey.
    Journal of Epidemiology &amp Community Health 10/1982; 36(3):224-7. DOI:10.1136/jech.36.3.224 · 3.50 Impact Factor
Show more