Article

Lipid Rafts & Co.: an integrated model of membrane organization in T cell activation.

Department of Internal Medicine III, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Progress in Lipid Research (Impact Factor: 12.96). 06/2006; 45(3):187-202. DOI: 10.1016/j.plipres.2006.01.002
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The model of membrane compartmentalization by self-organizing functional lipid microdomains, named lipid rafts, has been a fruitful concept resulting in great progress in understanding T cell signal transduction. However, due to recent results it has become clear that lipid rafts describe only one out of several membrane organizing principles crucial for T cell activation besides fences and pickets and protein-protein interactions that take part in the formation of the immunological synapse as a highly organized structure at the T cell contact site to the antigen-presenting cell. This review describes the concepts of lipid rafts and other membrane organizing principles to evolve a novel integrated model on the functional role of microdomains in immunological synapse formation and T cell activation. Further research has to elucidate the relative contribution and interrelation of different modes of membrane organization in productive T cell activation.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
48 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Lipid rafts in the plasma membrane, domains rich in cholesterol and sphingolipids, have been implicated in a number of important membrane functions. Detergent insolubility has been used to define membrane "rafts" biochemically. However, such an approach does not directly contribute to the understanding of the size and the lifetime of rafts, dynamics of the raft-constituent molecules, and the function of rafts in the membrane in situ. To address these issues, we have developed pulse EPR spin labeling and single molecule tracking optical techniques for studies of rafts in both artificial and cell membranes. In this review, we summarize our results and perspectives obtained by using these methods. We emphasize the importance of clearly distinguishing small/unstable rafts (lifetime shorter than a millisecond) in unstimulated cells and stabilized rafts induced by liganded and oligomerized (GPI-anchored) receptor molecules (core receptor rafts, lifetime over a few minutes). We propose that these stabilized rafts further induce temporal, greater rafts (signaling rafts, lifetime on the order of a second) for signaling by coalescing other small/unstable rafts, including those in the inner leaflet of the membrane, each containing perhaps one molecule of the downstream effector molecules. At variance with the general view, we emphasize the importance of cholesterol segregation from the liquid-crystalline unsaturated bulk-phase membrane for formation of the rafts, rather than the affinity of cholesterol and saturated alkyl chains. In the binary mixture of cholesterol and an unsaturated phospholipid, cholesterol is segregated out from the bulk unsaturated liquid-crystalline phase, forming cholesterol-enriched domains or clustered cholesterol domains, probably due to the lateral nonconformability between the rigid planar transfused ring structure of cholesterol and the rigid bend of the unsaturated alkyl chain at C9-C10. However, such cholesterol-rich domains are small, perhaps consisting of only several cholesterol molecules, and are short-lived, on the order of 1-100 ns. We speculate that these cholesterol-enriched domains may be stabilized by the presence of saturated alkyl chains of sphingomyelin or glycosphingolipids, and also by clustered raft proteins. In the influenza viral membrane, one of the simplest forms of a biological membrane, the lifetime of a protein and cholesterol-rich domain was evaluated to be on the order of 100 micro, again showing the short lifetime of rafts in an unstimulated state. Finally, we propose a thermal Lego model for rafts as the basic building blocks for signaling pathways in the plasma membrane.
    Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 04/2003; 1610(2):231-43. · 4.66 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Antigen-independent adhesive interactions between T lymphocytes and antigen-presenting cells (APCs) are essential for scanning for specific antigens on the APC surface and for initiating the immune response. Here we show, through time-lapse imaging of live cells, that the intercellular adhesion molecule 3 (ICAM-3, also known as CD50) is clustered specifically at the region of the T lymphocyte surface that initiates contact with APCs. We describe the role of ICAM-3 in T cell-APC conjugate formation before antigen recognition, in early intracellular signaling and in cytoskeletal rearrangement. Our data indicate that ICAM-3 is important in the initial scanning of the APC surface by T cells and, therefore, in generating the immune response.
    Nature Immunology 03/2002; 3(2):159-68. · 24.97 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Phosphoprotein associated with GEMs (PAG), also known as Csk-binding protein (Cbp), is a broadly expressed palmitoylated transmembrane adapter protein found in membrane rafts, also called GEMs (glycosphingolipid-enriched membrane microdomains). PAG is known to bind and activate the essential regulator of Src-family kinases, cytoplasmic protein tyrosine kinase Csk. In the present study we used the yeast 2-hybrid system to search for additional proteins which might bind to PAG. We have identified the abundant cytoplasmic adapter protein EBP50 (ezrin/radixin/moesin (ERM)-binding phosphoprotein of 50 kDa), also known as NHERF (Na(+)/H(+) exchanger regulatory factor), as a specific PAG-binding partner. The interaction involves the C-terminal sequence (TRL) of PAG and N-terminal PDZ domain(s) of EBP50. As EBP50 is known to interact via its C-terminal domain with the ERM-family proteins, which in turn bind to actin cytoskeleton, the PAG-EBP50 interaction may be important for connecting membrane rafts to the actin cytoskeleton.
    FEBS Letters 11/2001; 507(2):133-6. · 3.34 Impact Factor