Article

Impact of economic incentives on quality of professional life and on end-user satisfaction in primary care.

Consorci d'Atenció Primària de Salut de l'Eixample (CAPSE), Barcelona, Spain.
Health Policy (Impact Factor: 1.73). 01/2007; 80(1):2-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2006.02.008
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT A new economic incentive scheme based on (i) quality of care objectives for physicians, and (ii) professional development for both physicians and nurses, was introduced in primary care teams.
To assess weather the implementation of these economic incentive schemes has had an impact on the quality of professional life (QPL) of both physicians and nurses and on end-user satisfaction.
Before-after study. Participants are 257 primary care teams in Catalonia, Spain, in the period 2002-2003. QPL and end-user satisfaction were used as outcome measures.
QPL was improved in terms of the dimension "perception of support from the management structure" among physicians (4.897 versus 5.220; p<0.001) as well as nurses (5.272 versus 5.638; p<0.001). Further, physicians perceived an increase in the dimension "demands made upon them" (6.124 versus 6.364; p<0.001), differently from the nurses group (5.8191 versus 5.929; p=0.063). Overall, user satisfaction did not vary significantly, although a positive relationship was found between "perception of support from the management structure" and user satisfaction among nurses (beta=0.078, p=0.007), and a negative relationship between "demands made upon them" and user satisfaction in the case of physicians (beta=-0.057, p=0.011).
Incentives related to quality of care annual targets may increase physicians' perception of burden and it may have a negative impact on consumer satisfaction. Incentives on long-term professional development seem to be related to an increase in professionals' perception of support from the management structure. Among nurses, this increase is related to an improvement of user satisfaction.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Carmen Cabezas, Jul 28, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
157 Views
  • Source
    • "Public physicians can better apply these recommendations when they are the only doctors responsible for providing care for the patients. Catalan PHC teams are financed by a per capita budget and by a variable part related to the achievement of health-care quality objectives, measured with performance indicators [6] [8]. Evaluation of primary health-care teams must take these structural factors into account to avoid erroneous measurements of service quality due to the non-modifiable structural factors that affect the results. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To identify the characteristics of the primary health-care (PHC) team's structure and of the assigned population affecting service quality dimensions, and to check whether the PHC team's performance varies when assessing the service quality using crude values or those adjusted by the structural factors that affect it. Cross-sectional descriptive study. 213 Catalan PHC teams. Service quality indicators measured in three dimensions: (1) access and physician-patient relationship; (2) team coordination and (3) evidence-based practice. The PHC team structural factors studied are: experience, setting (urban or rural), geographical dispersion, teaching activities and managerial structure. The catchment population characteristics analysed are: age, socio-economic level, mortality, and the proportion of the population that are immigrants. Access and physician-patient relationship dimension were not affected by the studied structural factors. Team coordination improved in rural teams and in those providing care for older populations. Evidence-based practice was found to be higher in teaching teams, in more experienced teams and in those attending populations with a lower socio-economic level. Adjusted service quality indicator values substantially modify the PHC team quality ranking carried out on the basis of its crude values, especially in the team coordination and evidence-based practice dimensions. A fair evaluation of PHC team performance must be based on its health-care service quality indicators adjusted for setting, age and socio-economic level of the catchment population and for the team's experience and teaching activities.
    Health Policy 06/2008; 86(2-3):335-44. DOI:10.1016/j.healthpol.2007.11.014 · 1.73 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Article: EconomiX
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper proposes an effective method to schedule spinning reserve optimally. It initially employs Lagrangian relaxation technique to obtain the commitment schedule by relaxing the demand constraint, spinning reserve constraint and every unit ramp rate constraint. Using the forward dispatch, dispatch modification and backward dispatch, a generation schedule which satisfies the spinning reserve requirement and the ramp rate limits is obtained. This schedule is updated by the probabilistic reserve assessment to meet a given risk index. The optimal value of the risk index is selected based on the tradeoff between the total unit commitment schedule cost and the expected cost of energy not served. Finally, a unit decommitment technique is incorporated to solve the problem of reserve over-commitment in Lagrangian relaxation based unit commitment. The algorithm is shown to be efficient and the results are near optimal judging from the simulation runs performed on the extended IEEE reliability test system.
    Power Engineering Society 1999 Winter Meeting, IEEE; 01/1999
Show more