Article

Paraffinomas of the breast or oleogranulomatous mastitis - a rare entity

Breast Unit, 2nd Propaedeutic, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Athens, "Laiko" General Hospital, 8, Iassiou Street, 11521 Athens, Greece.
The Breast (Impact Factor: 2.58). 09/2006; 15(4):540-3. DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2005.08.036
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Breast augmentation with the injection of a high-viscosity fluid has been practiced in the past, especially in Asia, resulting in most cases in different varieties of paraffinoma, alternatively known as oleogranulomatous mastitis, a complication of a 'foreign body' reaction type. We report our series of four consecutive cases of destructive paraffinomas that occurred in female patients who had had paraffin injection for cosmetic reasons. Complications due to paraffinoma reactions of breast tissue and skin, as well as progression of the disease and treatment of our patients, are presented here, together with a review of the relevant literature.

0 Followers
 · 
74 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of using additional oblique coronal 1 mm proton density-weighted (PDW) MR imaging of the knee for detection and grading anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), anteromedial bundle (AMB) and posterolateral bundle (PLB) injuries. We prospectively assessed preoperative MR images of 50 patients (36 men, 14 women; age range, 18-62 years). First, we compared the diagnostic performance of routine sagittal (3 mm) and additional oblique coronal images (1 mm) for ACL tears. Then, we compared the tear types (AMB or PLB) and grade presumed from oblique coronal MR imaging with arthroscopy. Arthroscopy revealed ACL tear in 24 (48%) patients. There was significant difference between sagittal images and arthroscopy results for ACL tear recognition (p<0.001). No significant difference was detected for oblique coronal images when compared with arthroscopy results (p=0.180). Sensitivity and specificity values for ACL tear diagnosis were 37.04% and 95.65% for sagittal images; 74.07% and 91.30% for oblique coronal images. There was no significant difference between arthroscopy and oblique coronal MR images in grading AMB and PLB injuries (p>0.05). Addition of thin slice oblique coronal images to conventional sequences could better contribute to better verifying the presence of ACL tear and in determining its grade.
    European journal of radiology 10/2011; 81(9):2358-65. DOI:10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.09.008 · 2.16 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In recent years, injections with filler agents are often used for wrinkle-treatment and soft tissue augmentation by dermatologists and plastic surgeons. Unfortunately, the ideal filler has not yet been discovered and all of them may induce adverse reactions. Quickly biodegradable or resorbable agents may induce severe complications, but they will normally disappear spontaneously in a few months. Slowly biodegradable or nonresorbable fillers may give rise to severe reactions that show little or no tendency to spontaneous improvement. They may appear several years after the injection, when the patient does not remember which product was injected, and treatment is often insufficient. In this review, we discuss the most commonly used fillers, their most frequent adverse reactions as well as the characteristic histopathologic findings that allow the identification of the injected filler agent. In conclusion, histopathologic study remains as the gold standard technique to identify the responsible filler.
    Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 01/2011; 64(1):1-34; quiz 35-6. DOI:10.1016/j.jaad.2010.02.064 · 5.00 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to categorize the morphologic and kinetic features of enhancing lesions in breasts with interstitial mammoplasty using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and to assess factors predictive of breast cancer. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical and radiological data of 21 enhancing lesions in 19 patients with interstitial mammoplasty, who underwent breast magnetic resonance imaging and biopsy or an operation in our hospital from September 2008 to July 2012. These lesions were sorted by morphological and kinetic features and final assessment category according to the BI-RADS lexicon. Nine cases were confirmed to be ductal carcinoma in situ (n=2) and invasive ductal carcinoma (n=7), and the remaining 12 cases were fibrocystic disease (n=2), fibroadenoma (n=2), fat necrosis (n=1), foreign body granuloma (n=3) and silicone mastitis (n=1). Common features of malignancy included irregular shape (50.0%), spiculated margins (75.0%), heterogeneous enhancement (50.0%) and type III kinetic pattern (87.5%). The correlations of margins and kinetic curve pattern with benignity and malignancy approached statistical significance (p=0.02, respectively). We found no correlation for shape (p=0.33) or internal enhancement (p=0.42) between lesion types. The malignancy rate of enhancing lesions was 42.8% (9/21). The sensitivity and specificity of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging were 100% and 16.67%, respectively. The positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging were 47.38%, 100% and 52.38%. Overall inter-observer agreement for the kinetic curve pattern was good (κ=0.67). Moderate agreement was seen in describing the shape, margin, enhancement and assessing the final category (κ=0.59, 0.46, 0.58 and 0.49, respectively). Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging had a high sensitivity, negative predictive value for the prediction of breast cancer but a low specificity due to features of foreign body-related lesions that mimicked malignant lesions. The significant predictive factors for malignancy were margins, kinetic curve pattern and final assessment category. Overall inter-observer agreement for the kinetic curve pattern was good.
    European journal of radiology 09/2013; 82(12). DOI:10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.09.008 · 2.16 Impact Factor