Article

Determination of trunk muscle forces for flexion and extension by using a validated finite element model of the lumbar spine and measured in vivo data.

Biomechanics Laboratory, Charité, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203 Berlin, Germany.
Journal of Biomechanics (Impact Factor: 2.5). 02/2006; 39(6):981-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.02.019
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Muscle forces stabilize the spine and have a great influence on spinal loads. But little is known about their magnitude. In a former in vitro experiment, a good agreement with intradiscal pressure and fixator loads measured in vivo could be achieved for standing and extension of the lumbar spine. However, for flexion the agreement between in vitro and in vivo measurements was insufficient. In order to improve the determination of trunk muscle forces, a three-dimensional nonlinear finite element model of the lumbar spine with an internal fixation device was created and the same loads were applied as in a previous in vitro experiment. An extensive adaptation process of the model was performed for flexion and extension angles up to 20 degrees and -15 degrees, respectively. With this validated computer model intra-abdominal pressure, preload in the fixators, and a combination of hip- and lumbar flexion angle were varied until a good agreement between analytical and in vivo results was reached for both, intradiscal pressure and bending moments in the fixators. Finally, the fixators were removed and the muscle forces for the intact lumbar spine calculated. A good agreement with the in vivo results could only be achieved at a combination of hip- and lumbar flexion. For the intact spine, forces of 170, 100 and 600 N are predicted in the m. erector spinae for standing, 5 degrees extension and 30 degrees flexion, respectively. The force in the m. rectus abdominus for these body positions is less than 25 N. For more than 10 degrees extension the m. erector spinae is unloaded. The finite element method together with in vivo data allows the estimation of trunk muscle forces for different upper body positions in the sagittal plane. In our patients, flexion of the upper body was most likely a combination of hip- and lumbar spine bending.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
78 Views
  • Source
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Object: To establish a non-linear finite element (FE) model for human L4-L5 lumbar segment and verify its reliability. Method: A FE model of human L4-L5 lumbar segment was established. Some empirical expressions were used to simulate the mechanical properties of vertebral body. The annulus fibrosus and nucleus were assigned hyper-elastic material. The surrounding ligaments were assigned be unsymmetric spring elements. The FE model was developed in ABAQUS software under the loading conditions of axial compression, lateral bending, extension, torsion, and flexion. Result: The result curves of different loading conditions all represent a similar nonlinear curve. The axial force and displacement curve of L4-L5 FE model was closely correlated with the published results of in vitro experimental study. The relationship between moment and degrees also showed a good agreement with the experimentally determined in vitro data during the loading condition of lateral bending, extension, torsion, and flexion. Conclusion: The FE model established in this paper can effectively reflect the actual mechanical properties of human L4-L5 lumbar spine. It can be used as the basis for further research on lumbar degenerative diseases and related treatments.
    2010 3rd International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Informatics (BMEI); 10/2010
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Das neuartige transsakrale Fusionssystem AxiALIF erlaubt die Stabilisierung des lumbosakralen Übergangs. Das System besteht aus einer Schraube, die 2 unterschiedliche Durchmesser hat. Durch zusätzliche Facettenschrauben oder Fixateure kann eine 360°-Fusion erreicht werden. Die Einflüsse verschiedener Parameter wie Länge, Durchmesserkombination und Material der transsakralen Schraube, Art der zusätzlichen Fixierung sowie Steifigkeit des Knochens sind nicht bekannt.In einer probabilistischen Finite-Elemente-Studie wurden die Eingabeparameter zufällig variiert. Berechnet wurden die Rotationswinkel und die Axialkräfte in den verschiedenen Implantaten für 4 verschiedene Lastfälle. In einer anschließenden Sensitivitätsanalyse wurden die Einflüsse der einzelnen Eingabeparameter auf die Ergebnisvariation berechnet. Durch die transsakrale Schraube wird die Beweglichkeit im behandelten Segment deutlich reduziert, außer bei der axialen Rotation. Eine zusätzliche Fixierung hat einen großen Einfluss auf die Variation der Rotation. Die anderen Parameter erklären üblicherweise weniger als 10% der Ergebnisstreuung.Das lumbosakrale Fusionssystem erlaubt eine gute Stabilisierung des Segments, besonders in Verbindung mit einer zusätzlichen Fixierung.
    Der Orthopäde 01/2011; 40(2). · 0.67 Impact Factor