Charlson Index is associated with one-year mortality in emergency department patients with suspected infection.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Academic Emergency Medicine (Impact Factor: 2.2). 05/2006; 13(5):530-6. DOI: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.11.084
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT A patient's baseline health status may affect the ability to survive an acute illness. Emergency medicine research requires tools to adjust for confounders such as comorbid illnesses. The Charlson Comorbidity Index has been validated in many settings but not extensively in the emergency department (ED). The purpose of this study was to examine the utility of the Charlson Index as a predictor of one-year mortality in a population of ED patients with suspected infection.
The comorbid illness components of the Charlson Index were prospectively abstracted from the medical records of adult (age older than 18 years) ED patients at risk for infection (indicated by the clinical decision to obtain a blood culture) and weighted. Charlson scores were grouped into four previously established indices: 0 points (none), 1-2 points (low), 3-4 points (moderate), and > or =5 points (high). The primary outcome was one-year mortality assessed using the National Death Index and medical records. Cox proportional-hazards ratios were calculated, adjusting for age, gender, and markers of 28-day in-hospital mortality.
Between February 1, 2000, and February 1, 2001, 3,102 unique patients (96% of eligible patients) were enrolled at an urban teaching hospital. Overall one-year mortality was 22% (667/3,102). Mortality rates increased with increasing Charlson scores: none, 7% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 5.4% to 8.5%); low, 22% (95% CI = 19% to 24%); moderate, 31% (95% CI = 27% to 35%); and high, 40% (95% CI = 36% to 44%). Controlling for age, gender, and factors associated with 28-day mortality, and using the "none" group as a reference group, the Charlson Index predicted mortality as follows: low, odds ratio of 2.0; moderate, odds ratio of 2.5; and high, odds ratio of 4.7.
This study suggests that the Charlson Index predicts one-year mortality among ED patients with suspected infection.


Available from: David W Bates, Sep 19, 2014
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVES Impaired arousal signifies underlying brain dysfunction, but its clinical significance outside the intensive care unit remains unclear. We sought to determine if impaired arousal at initial presentation was associated with higher 6-month mortality and if this relationship existed in the absence of delirium.DESIGNProspective cohort study.SETTINGAn emergency department located within an academic, tertiary care hospital.PARTICIPANTSA total of 1084 noncomatose patients who were aged 65 years or older.MEASUREMENTSThe Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) is a 10-second arousal scale; a score of 0 indicates normal arousal. Cox proportional hazard regression was performed adjusting for patient characteristics, admission status, and psychoactive medication administration. To determine if impaired arousal in the absence of delirium was associated with 6-month mortality, Cox proportional hazard regression was performed in a subset of 406 patients who received a psychiatric assessment; the inverse weighted propensity score method was used to minimize residual confounding. Hazard ratios (HR) with their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were reported.RESULTSPatients with impaired arousal were 73% more likely to die within 6 months (HR: 1.73, 95% CI: 1.21-2.49). Even in the absence of delirium, patients with an abnormal RASS were more likely to die within 6 months (HR: 2.20, 95% CI: 1.10-4.41).CONCLUSION Impaired arousal at initial presentation is an independent predictor of death within 6 months in a diverse group of acutely ill older patients, even in the absence of delirium. Routine RASS assessment of arousal during clinical care may be warranted as it correlates with prognosis. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2014. © 2014 Society of Hospital Medicine
    Journal of Hospital Medicine 12/2014; 9(12). DOI:10.1002/jhm.2276 · 2.08 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objectives: Guidelines for post-cardiac arrest care recommend blood pressure optimization as one component of neuroprotection. Although some retrospective clinical studies suggest that postresuscitation hypotension may be harmful, and laboratory studies suggest that a postresuscitation hypertensive surge may be protective, empirical data are few. In this study, we prospectively measured blood pressure over time during the postresuscitation period and tested its association with neurologic outcome. Design: Single center, prospective observational study from 2009 to 2012. Patients: Inclusion criteria were age 18 years old or older, pre-arrest independent functional status, resuscitation from cardiac arrest, and comatose immediately after resuscitation. Measurements and Main Results: Our research protocol measured blood pressure noninvasively every 15 minutes for the first 6 hours after resuscitation. We calculated the 0-to 6-hour time-weighted average mean arterial pressure and used multivariable logistic regression to test the association between increasing time-weighted average mean arterial pressures and good neurologic outcome, defined as Cerebral Performance Category 1 or 2 at hospital discharge. Among 151 patients, 44 (29%) experienced good neurologic outcome. The association between blood pressure and outcome appears to have a threshold effect at time-weighted average mean arterial pressure value of 70 mm Hg. This threshold (mean arterial pressure > 70 mm Hg) had the strongest association with good neurologic outcome (odds ratio, 4.11; 95% CI, 1.34-12.66; p = 0.014). A sustained intrinsic hypertensive surge was relatively uncommon and was not associated with neurologic outcome. Conclusions: We found that time-weighted average mean arterial pressure was associated with good neurologic outcome at a threshold of mean arterial pressure greater than 70 mm Hg.
    Critical Care Medicine 06/2014; 42(9). DOI:10.1097/CCM.0000000000000406 · 6.15 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction The aetiology of postoperative delirium (POD) following vascular surgery is generally unknown. The incidence however can be as high as 35%. A possible neuroinflammatory basis for delirium is likely and c-reactie protein) as a marker for inflammation can possibly plays a predictive role. Methods Between March 2010 and September 2012, 277 consecutive elective vascular surgery patients were prospectively evaluated for the diagnosis of POD. Various potential risk factors, including postoperative CRP-values, were collected. Results The mean age of the patients was 69±11 years (range 21-92). The mean hospital length of stay was 6±4 days (range 1-33). Sixteen patients (6%) developed POD during hospital stay. Univariate analysis revealed multiple comorbidities (P=0.001), postoperative elevated CRP levels (P=0.001), ICU-admittance (P=0.01) and open aortic surgery or amputation procedures (P=0.0001) to be significantly related to the diagnosis POD. Multivariate logistic regression analysis confirmed the relationship between an elevated CRP value and POD (OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.00-1.03, P=0.04). The sensitivity analyses yielded essentially similar results. Based on the odds ratio, it can be calculated that the risk of POD is increased by approximately 35% if the CRP concentration is 50 mg/L, and by approximately 90% if the CRP concentration is 100 mg/L (compared to a CRP concentration of 5 mg/L). Thirty-one percent (5/16) of patients with POD needed a long stay care facility after discharge (P=0.0001). Conclusions In this study, CRP can be used as a marker for an increased risk of POD after vascular surgery. In addition, it was found that POD was associated with a tenfold increase in the need of long stay care after discharge.
    Annals of Vascular Surgery 11/2014; 28(8). DOI:10.1016/j.avsg.2014.07.004 · 1.03 Impact Factor