Parents’ Perspectives on Research Involving Children

Dept. of Psychology, Uppsala University, Sweden.
Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences (Impact Factor: 1.98). 02/2006; 111(1):73-86. DOI: 10.3109/2000-1967-025
Source: PubMed


Children's participation in research is essential for the development of safe and age-appropriate treatments. However, children's participation is limited. The aim of this study was to determine (1) mothers' and fathers' views on which agencies/persons should evaluate the level of acceptable risk for children and (2) parents' willingness to allow children to participate in research. Medical factors, sociodemographics, and research attitudes were related to willingness. The study used a cross-sectional and longitudinal design with 863 expectant parents (435 women; 428 men) consecutively recruited at gestational week 19 during routine ultrasound examination at 2 hospitals in Uppsala County, Sweden. 123 women at gestational week 34 were followed-up. Parental ratings of agencies/persons' degree of involvement in risk-evaluation for. child research participants and parents' willingness to allow children to participate in research were the main outcome measures. Most parents believed that more pediatric research was needed. Attitudes played a major role in willingness, indicating a potential for information that could modify willingness. Over 80% of mothers and fathers rated the attending physician as needing to be "fully involved" in risk evaluation for research participants. Parents' views contradict current trends in research ethics which place evaluation of risk in the hands of regional agencies. Instead, the majority of parents would like the decision to be individually based on the attending physicians advise. We conclude that children's participation in research could be improved by actively incorporating the attending physician and by educating the public so that research attitudes can be based on accurate information.

Download full-text


Available from: Alina Rodriguez, Jul 29, 2014
14 Reads
  • Source
    • "A small number of studies have focused on parents' and children's opinions about the consent process [Brody et al., 2003; Broome et al., 2003; Geller et al., 2003; Tait et al., 2004; Stolt et al., 2005; Chappuy et al., 2006; Gattuso et al., 2006; Rodriguez et al., 2006; Eder et al., 2007; Sammons et al., 2007] and general participation [Bernhardt et al., 2003] in studies of genetic susceptibility. Some studies have looked at parents' reasons for participation or refusal, and their considerations of study risks and benefits [Tait et al., 2004; Gattuso et al., 2006; Rodriguez et al., 2006]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The National Institutes of Health and other federal agencies are considering initiating a cohort study of 500,000 people, including 120,000 children, to measure genetic and environmental influences on common diseases. A community engagement pilot study was conducted to identify public attitudes and concerns about the proposed cohort study, including the ethics of involving children. The pilot included 15 focus groups where the inclusion of children in the proposed cohort study was discussed. Focus groups, conducted in six cities, included 141 adults of different ages, incomes, genders, ethnicities, and races. Many of the concerns expressed by participants mirrored those addressed in pediatric research guidelines. These concerns included minimizing children's fear, pain, and burdens; whether to include young children; and how to obtain children's assent. There was little agreement about which children can assent. Some voiced concern about children's privacy, but most expected that parents would have access to children's study results. Some believed children would not benefit from participating, while others identified personal and societal benefits that might accrue. A few people believed that children's participation would not advance the study's goals. To successfully include children, proposed cohort study would need to address children's changing capabilities and rights as they grow and reach the age of consent.
    American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C Seminars in Medical Genetics 02/2008; 148C(1):31-9. DOI:10.1002/ajmg.c.30159 · 3.91 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "The requirement to obtain informed consent is universal within medicine today, even though information and consent procedures vary [3-7]. It is further clear that most patients want to be informed and that many also want to participate in medical decision-making [8-10]. Accordingly, there is a strong emphasis on patients' understanding of procedures, risks, benefits and alternative therapies whether participating in medical treatment or in clinical trials [11-13]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Time and communication are important aspects of the medical consultation. Physician behavior in real-life pediatric consultations in relation to ethical practice, such as informed consent (provision of information, understanding), respect for integrity and patient autonomy (decision-making), has not been subjected to thorough empirical investigation. Such investigations are important tools in developing sound ethical praxis. 21 consultations for inguinal hernia were video recorded and observers independently assessed global impressions of provision of information, understanding, respect for integrity, and participation in decision making. The consultations were analyzed for the occurrence of specific physician verbal and nonverbal behaviors and length of time in minutes. All of the consultations took less than 20 minutes, the majority consisting of 10 minutes or less. Despite this narrow time frame, we found strong and consistent association between increasing time and higher ratings on all components of ethical practice: information, (beta = .43), understanding (beta = .52), respect for integrity (beta = .60), and decision making (beta = .43). Positive nonverbal behaviors by physicians during the consultation were associated particularly with respect for integrity (beta =.36). Positive behaviors by physicians during the physical examination were related to respect for children's integrity. Time was of essence for the ethical encounter. Further, verbal and nonverbal positive behaviors by the physicians also contributed to higher ratings of ethical aspects. These results can help to improve quality of ethical practice in pediatric settings and are of relevance for teaching and policy makers.
    BMC Medical Ethics 02/2007; 8:6. DOI:10.1186/1472-6939-8-6 · 1.50 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The spectrum of evidence imparted by the different clinical research designs ranges from ecological studies through observational epidemiological studies to randomized control trials (RCTs). This chapter addresses the definition of clinical research, the major aspects of clinical trials eg ethics, randomization, masking, recruitment and retention of subjects enrolled in a clinical trial, patients/subjects lost to follow-up during the trial etc. Although this chapter focuses on the weaknesses of clinical trials, it is emphasized that the randomized, placebocontrolled, double blind clinical trial is the design that yields the greatest level of scientific evidence. A researcher is in a gondola of a balloon that loses lift and lands in the middle of afield near a road. Of course, it looks like the balloon landed in the middle of nowhere. As the researcher ponders appropriate courses of action, another person wanders by. The researcher asks, ‘Where am I?’ The other person responds, ‘You are in the gondola of a balloon in the middle of a field.’ The researcher comments, ‘You must design clinical trials.’ ‘Well, that’ amazing, how did you know?’ ‘Your answer was correct and precise and totally useless.’
    Bulletin of the American College of Surgeons 05/2003; 88(5):43. DOI:10.1007/978-1-4020-8486-7_3
Show more