Article

Reliability of a Questionnaire and an Ergonomic Checklist for Assessing Working Conditions and Health at Call Centres

Department for Work and Health, National Institute for Working Life, Stockholm, Sweden.
International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics: JOSE (Impact Factor: 0.35). 02/2006; 12(1):53-68. DOI: 10.1080/10803548.2006.11076671
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The purpose was to study the test-retest reliability and internal consistency of questions in a questionnaire concerning working conditions and health and the inter-rater reliability of observations and measurements according to an ergonomic checklist.
Fifty-seven operators participated in a retest questionnaire and 58 operators participated in an inter-observer test.
The questions had fair to good or higher reliability in 142 of the total of 312. Twenty-seven of the total of 44 variables in the ergonomic checklist were classified as having fair to good or higher reliability.
About half of the questions had fair to good or higher reliability and can be recommended for further analyses. The majority of variables in the ergonomic checklist were classified as having fair to good or higher reliability. Low reliability does not necessarily indicate that the reliability of the test, per se, is low but may signify that the conditions measured vary over time or that the answers are aggregated in one part of the scale.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Allan Toomingas, Jul 03, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
257 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A survey of physical work conditions was performed in a strategic sample of call centres in Sweden. Extensive observations including measurements of work environment factors took place at 16 companies, involving 156 operators and their workstations. Observed conditions were compared with current directives and recommendations and also with the operators’ ratings of comfort and reported symptoms. Internal and external call centres working in the whole range of task complexity were compared.The air quality and thermal climate in the workplace were mainly satisfactory, but air humidity was low. Sound levels were often high at many workstations and illuminance too low. Glare and reflexions in the VDU-screens were common. The observations indicate that the conditions quite often were out of range of current directives and recommendations for sound working environment. The indoor climate, the air quality, the ambient noise level and the illumination created dissatisfaction of comfort among about 74% the operators. Correlations between the ratings of comfort and the observations were moderate, but most were statistically significant. No significant associations between symptoms (eyes, ears, throat, skin or headache) and the observations were found.Relevance to industryThe study provides useful data both for designing call centres and similar offices and for improvement of the physical work environment. It points out which physical factors and environment-related symptoms one should be especially aware of among call centre workers.
    International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 09/2007; DOI:10.1016/j.ergon.2007.06.006 · 1.21 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Call centres (CCs) are among the most rapidly growing forms of workplaces in Sweden. The purpose of the study was to describe and compare working conditions between operators at internal and external CC companies and work tasks of different complexity. A questionnaire was answered by 1183 operators, 848 women and 335 men, from 28 different CCs. The questionnaire covered background factors, employment, working hours and remuneration, call logging and monitoring, duties, computer work and workplace design during the previous month. Operators at external companies and operators with low-complexity work tasks were younger, more often employed by the hour and worked on a varying roster. They spent longer time on customer calls and had less varied tasks. Additional remuneration, call logging and monitoring were more common at external companies and among operators with low-complexity work tasks. The working conditions varied between internal and external CCs. There was also a variation in working conditions between work tasks of different complexity. There were aspects of supervision style and organization of work at CCs, especially at external ones and those with low-complexity tasks that could introduce stress and lack of well being among the staff.
    International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics: JOSE 02/2008; 14(2):177-94. · 0.35 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A survey of workstation layout and work postures among 156 computer operators was performed in 16 call centers (CCs) in Sweden, relating data to operators’ comfort, symptoms and existing ISO-standards, EU-directives and National Work Environment Law.The quality of the furniture and equipments was generally good and mainly fulfilled the demands of the law, directives and standards. The main problem was how these were used—how they were positioned and adjusted to fit the individual operator and to allow good and flexible work postures. Awkward postures were, therefore, seen in shoulder joints and wrists. Lack of easy height adjustability of many desks was noted. This was associated with more seated postures and back pain. Desk and chair quality were associated with operators’ satisfaction and work postures and thick keyboards with dissatisfaction and neck or back pain. Optimal adjustments were associated with operators’ satisfaction and good work postures and in some aspects also with fewer symptoms. The conditions were more optimal at internal CCs as opposed to freestanding external (outsourced) enterprises.
    International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 11/2008; 38(11):1051-1061. DOI:10.1016/j.ergon.2008.02.010 · 1.21 Impact Factor