Clinical and hemodynamic comparison of 15 : 2 and 30 : 2 compression-to-ventilation ratios for cardiopulmonary resuscitation

The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Filadelfia, Pennsylvania, United States
Critical Care Medicine (Impact Factor: 6.31). 05/2006; 34(5):1444-9. DOI: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000216705.83305.99
Source: PubMed


To compare cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) with a compression to ventilation (C:V) ratio of 15:2 vs. 30:2, with and without use of an impedance threshold device (ITD).
Prospective randomized animal and manikin study.
Animal laboratory and emergency medical technician training facilities.
Twenty female pigs and 20 Basic Life Support (BLS)-certified rescuers. INTERVENTIONS, MEASUREMENTS, AND MAIN RESULTS:
Acid-base status, cerebral, and cardiovascular hemodynamics were evaluated in 18 pigs in cardiac arrest randomized to a C:V ratio of 15:2 or 30:2. After 6 mins of cardiac arrest and 6 mins of CPR, an ITD was added. Compared to 15:2, 30:2 significantly increased diastolic blood pressure (20 +/- 1 to 26 +/- 1; p < .01); coronary perfusion pressure (18 +/- 1 to 25 +/- 2; p = .04); cerebral perfusion pressure (16 +/- 3 to 18 +/- 3; p = .07); common carotid blood flow (48 +/- 5 to 82 +/- 5 mL/min; p < .001); end-tidal CO2 (7.7 +/- 0.9 to 15.7 +/- 2.4; p < .0001); and mixed venous oxygen saturation (26 +/- 5 to 36 +/- 5, p < .05). Hemodynamics improved further with the ITD. Oxygenation and arterial pH were similar. Only one of nine pigs had return of spontaneous circulation with 15:2, vs. six of nine with 30:2 (p < 0.03). HUMANS: Fatigue and quality of CPR performance were evaluated in 20 BLS-certified rescuers randomized to perform CPR for 5 mins at 15:2 or 30:2 on a recording CPR manikin. There were no significant differences in the quality of CPR performance or measurement of fatigue. Significantly more compressions per minute were delivered with 30:2 in both the animal and human studies.
These data strongly support the contention that a ratio of 30:2 is superior to 15:2 during manual CPR and that the ITD further enhances circulation with both C:V ratios.


Available from: Jane G Wigginton
  • Source
    • "Hyperventilation is deleterious in all conditions of low-flow state. Studies of ventilation during shock emphasize the following principle: In a low-flow state, the duration of increased intrathoracic pressure is proportional to the ventilation rate, tidal volume, inspiratory time, and delayed chest decompression and is inversely proportional to coronary and cerebral artery perfusion.84,89-91 For example, ventilation at 20 breaths·min−1 during CPR is associated with significantly lower survival than ventilation at 10 breaths·min−1. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The constellation of advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) events, such as gas embolism, local anesthetic overdose, and spinal bradycardia, in the perioperative setting differs from events in the pre-hospital arena. As a result, modification of traditional ACLS protocols allows for more specific etiology-based resuscitation. Perioperative arrests are both uncommon and heterogeneous and have not been described or studied to the same extent as cardiac arrest in the community. These crises are usually witnessed, frequently anticipated, and involve a rescuer physician with knowledge of the patient's comorbidities and coexisting anesthetic or surgically related pathophysiology. When the health care provider identifies the probable cause of arrest, the practitioner has the ability to initiate medical management rapidly. Recommendations for management must be predicated on expert opinion and physiological understanding rather than on the standards currently being used in the generation of ACLS protocols in the community. Adapting ACLS algorithms and considering the differential diagnoses of these perioperative events may prevent cardiac arrest.
    Canadian Anaesthetists? Society Journal 04/2012; 59(6):586-603. DOI:10.1007/s12630-012-9699-3 · 2.53 Impact Factor
  • Source

    Notfall 11/2010; 13(7):559-620. DOI:10.1007/s10049-010-1370-3 · 0.47 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Dismal survival statistics associated with sudden cardiac arrest have led to the development of new strategies and mechanical devices aimed at improving the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). The most recent American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care were published in 2005. Major changes included revisions to current practices related to airway and ventilation, circulation, and defibrillation management. Greater emphasis is placed on providing simple, high-quality, effective CPR. New techniques and mechanical devices have been developed to augment CPR, hopefully improving survival rates and long-term outcomes. These include active compression-decompression CPR, Lund University Cardiac Assist System, LifeBelt, AutoPulse, and the impedance threshold device. This article focuses on current strategies aimed at improving survival rates for patients with sudden cardiac arrest. New techniques and mechanical devices developed to augment cardiopulmonary resuscitation will be discussed. These strategies will most likely shape future resuscitation practices.
    AACN Advanced Critical Care 10/2009; 20(4):373-83. DOI:10.1097/NCI.0b013e3181baf5e4
Show more