Early predictors of deliberate self-harm among adolescents. A prospective follow-up study from age 3 to age 15.

Department of Child Psychiatry, Turku University Hospital, 20520 Turku, Finland.
Journal of Affective Disorders (Impact Factor: 3.71). 08/2006; 93(1-3):87-96. DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2006.02.015
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To study predictors at age 3 and at age 12 for ideations and acts of deliberate self-harm at age 15 in a representative birth cohort.
Information about ideations and acts of deliberate self-harm at age 12 and at age 15 was obtained from parents and children. Information about the child's problems was obtained at age 3 using the Child Behavior Checklist 2/3 (CBCL 2/3), and at age 12 with the CBCL and Youth Self-report (YSR). Furthermore, when the child was 12, mothers and fathers gave information about their own health, well-being and mental distress, and about family functioning measured with the Family Assessment Device (FAD).
There was a significant increase in self-reported deliberate self-harm (ideations or acts) from age 12 to age 15, especially among girls (from 3% to 13%). Parent-child agreement on acts and ideations of deliberate self-harm was very low at both time-points (proportion of agreement 0.0-0.2). Self-reports of deliberate self-harm at age 12 independently predicted both acts and ideations of deliberate self-harm at age 15. Female gender, self-reports of internalizing problems and somatic complaints, parent reports of child's externalizing problems and aggressivity, mother's reports of her health problems, and living in nonintact family at age 12 independently predicted self-reported acts of deliberate self-harm 3 years later. Parent reports of child's learning difficulties, and self-reports of being bullied independently predicted ideations of deliberate self-harm at age 15. Parent reports of child's psychopathology at age 3 assessed with the CBCL 2/3 had no predictive association with ideation or acts of deliberate self-harm at age 15.
Acts of deliberate self-harm in mid-adolescence are due to an accumulation of earlier family and parental distress, and child's externalizing and internalizing problems. Information about deliberate self-harm at age 12 is an important warning sign of deliberate self-harm in mid-adolescence.

1 Bookmark
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Few instruments have been developed to assess the risk of self-harm by psychiatric patients and the evidence for their predictive validity is limited. Given that individuals who self-harm may also engage in other-directed aggression, and that the behaviour can be a precursor to violence, we tested whether, and for which groups, the commonly used violence risk assessment HCR-20 demonstrated predictive validity for self-harm. Procedures A pseudo-prospective cohort study (n = 504) was conducted in a UK secure/forensic mental health setting using routinely collected data. HCR-20 assessments were completed by the clinical team and incidents of self-harm during the three months following assessment were coded from patient records. Findings The HCR-20 total score, H10 and R5 subscales, and SJ for violence significantly predicted self-harm; however, AUC values did not demonstrate large effect sizes (range .345 to .749). Personality disorder and impulsivity were the strongest predictors of self-harm, but the R5 scale contained the greatest proportion of relevant items. Predictive efficacy was superior for women compared with men and for those with schizophrenia or personality disorder compared with organic and developmental disorders. Conclusions The HCR-20 appears to be a significant predictor of self-harm. It may be possible to supplement HCR-20 ratings with case specific knowledge and additional known risk factors for self-harm to make a valuable summary judgement about the behaviour and thus minimise the need for multiple assessment tools.
    Comprehensive Psychiatry 07/2014; 55(8):1937-1949. · 2.26 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Suicide is a public health problem. In Colombia, teenagers are considered a group at high risk for suicidal behavior. Objective To explore the possible association between suicidal behavior and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in adolescents of Medellin. Methodology Observational, cross-sectional, analytical study. The Composite International Diagnostic Interview was applied to a total of 447 adolescents and the sociodemographic, clinical, familiar, and life event variables of interest were analyzed. The descriptive analysis of qualitative variables are presented as absolute values and frequencies, and the age was described with median [interquartile range]. A logistic regression model was constructed with explanatory variables that showed statistical association. Data were analyzed with SPSS® software version 21.0. Results Of the total, 59.1% were female, and the median age was 16 [14-18] years. Suicidal behavior was presented in 31% of females and 23% of males. Attention deficit was present in 6.3% of adolescents. The logistic regression analysis showed that the variables that best explained the suicidal behavior of adolescents were: female sex, post-traumatic stress disorder, panic disorder, and cocaine use. Conclusions The diagnosis and early intervention of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children may be a useful strategy in the prevention of suicidal behavior in adolescents.
    Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatría. 10/2014;
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper presents the outcomes of a Dialectical Behavior Treatment (DBT) program, implemented in intensive outpatient care with two groups of adolescents (n = 55 and n = 45), ages 12-18, who engaged in deliberate self-harm (DSH) but had different insurance/funding sources and risk backgrounds. This pre-post study examined variability in clinical functioning and treatment utilization between the two groups and investigated moderating risk factors. Findings support DBT's effectiveness in improving clinical functioning for youth with DSH regardless of insurance type. However, lower rates of treatment completion among youth without private insurance call for extra engagement efforts to retain high-risk youth in DBT.
    Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research 09/2014; · 3.44 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 31, 2014