Article

Bi-syllabic, modern Greek word lists for use in word recognition tests.

Clinical Psychoacoustics Laboratory, 3rd Psychiatric Department, Neuroscience Division, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece.
International Journal of Audiology (Impact Factor: 1.43). 02/2006; 45(2):74-82.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The development of a word recognition test for Modern Greek, which is comprised of three fifty-word lists, is described herein. The development was guided by four principles: (1) use of the shortest words possible (two syllables for Greek) (2) use of highly frequent words (3) phonetic balance and (4) appropriate balance of first and second syllable stress. The lists were recorded by one male and one female native speakers. Thirty-seven native speakers of Greek listened to all words by both speakers. Across lists, the mean correct identification score was 97.9% for the female voice (95% confidence interval 96.97 to 98.84) and 96.5% (95% confidence interval 95.31 to 97.77) for the male voice. This small difference was statistically significant (p < .01) and concentrated on words with first syllable stress. In future work, these recordings can be used in adult tests of speech perception and can be modified for tests of central auditory processing.

Full-text

Available from: Vassiliki Iliadou, Jun 03, 2015
1 Follower
 · 
295 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: Evaluate auditory temporal resolution threshold outcomes across three different populations. Design: Two commercially available tests of auditory gap detection (Random gap detection (RGDT) test, and Gaps-in-noise (GIN) test) were administered to all participants. Study sample: Adult professional musicians (APM) (N = 11, age range 28-61 years); children with central auditory processing disorder (CAPD) (N = 22, age range 7.5-17 years); and first episode psychosis patients (FEP) (N = 17, age range 18-48 years). Results: It was not possible to calculate a threshold for the RGDT for 13 of 22 children with CAPD and for 7 of 17 adults with FEP due to response inconsistency. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) excluding cases that produced inconsistent RGDT results showed that only RGDT thresholds differed across groups (F = 8.73, p = 0.001). Three t-tests comparing test means within group revealed statistically significant differences between the gap detection thresholds obtained with the RGDT vs. the GIN for each group. No significant correlations were seen between RGDT and GIN. Conclusion: Lower/better gap detection thresholds and smaller standard deviations were obtained using the GIN in all three groups. Lack of correlation between the two tests suggests that they may measure different processes.
    International journal of audiology 05/2014; DOI:10.3109/14992027.2014.900576 · 1.43 Impact Factor
  • Source
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The scope of this study was to trace of central auditory processing issues in patients with first episode psychosis using a psychoacoustic test battery approach. Patients were included in the study on the basis of normal hearing sensitivity. A central auditory processing battery was implemented consisting of monaural and binaural tests with verbal and non-verbal stimuli. Seventeen control subjects were volunteers with no personal or family history of schizophrenia. Seventeen (17) patients were tested to evaluate central auditory processing abilities. Perceptual deficits in both non-verbal and verbal auditory stimuli are reported in this study with temporal central auditory processing deficits and a mean left ear left ear advantage (LEA) being documented in the patient group. This study points to the possibility of existence of central auditory processing deficits in first episode psychosis leading to schizophrenia. Audiologists should be aware of the psychiatric research pointing to enhanced verbal memory as a result of auditory training; linking bottom-up remediation with top-down improvement.
    American Journal of Audiology 07/2013; DOI:10.1044/1059-0889(2013/12-0073) · 1.07 Impact Factor