Article

Accuracy of obstetric diagnoses and procedures in hospital discharge data

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, United States
American journal of obstetrics and gynecology (Impact Factor: 3.97). 05/2006; 194(4):992-1001. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.08.058
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The objective of the study was to estimate the validity of obstetric procedures and diagnoses in California patient discharge data.
We randomly sampled 1611 deliveries from 52 of 267 California hospitals that performed more than 678 eligible deliveries in 1992 to 1993. We compared hospital-reported procedures and diagnoses against our recoding of the same records.
Cesarean, forceps, and vacuum delivery were accurately reported, with sensitivities and positive predictive values exceeding 90%. Episiotomy was underreported (70% sensitivity). Cesarean indications were reported with at least 60% sensitivity, except uterine inertia, herpes, and long labor. Among comorbidities, sensitivity exceeded 60% for chorioamnionitis, diabetes, premature labor, preeclampsia, and intrauterine death. Sensitivity was poor (less than 60%) for anemia, asthma, thyroid disorders, mental disorders, drug abuse, genitourinary infections, obesity, fibroids, excessive fetal growth, hypertension, premature rupture, polyhydramnios, and postdates.
The validity of hospital-reported obstetric procedures and diagnoses varies, with moderate to high accuracy for some codes but poor accuracy for others.

2 Followers
 · 
175 Views
  • Source
    • "however, be improved by record linkage either over time and/or to other datasets. Table 2 Sensitivity of reporting in hospital discharge data compared to the gold standard of medical record review: comparison of our results to other studies of maternal medical conditions Condition or complication NSW data (Present study) Washington State data (Lydon-Rochelle et al. 2005) 7 Californian data (Yasmeen et al. 2006) "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Population health datasets are a valuable resource for studying maternal and obstetric health outcomes. However, their validity has not been thoroughly examined. We compared medical records from a random selection of New South Wales (NSW) women who gave birth in a NSW hospital in 2002 with coded hospital discharge records. We estimated the population prevalence of maternal medical conditions during pregnancy and found a tendency towards underreporting although specificities were high, indicating that false positives were uncommon.
    Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 03/2008; 48(1):78-82. DOI:10.1111/j.1479-828X.2007.00818.x · 1.62 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "This statistic is likely to be closer to the truth, if not even a little conservative. Multiple studies comparing the accuracy of birth certificate data to actual hospital records and/or discharge data have consistently found induction rates to be underreported (Lydon-Rochelle et al., 2005; Northam & Knapp, 2006; Yasmeen, Romano, Schembri, Keyzer, & Gilbert, 2006). Between the two—cesareans and induction—we could just recycle all the brochures on our shelves about ''how to know when your labor has started'' and ask Al Gore what to do with them. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In the face of challenging times, advocates for women and their families in maternal-child health care continue to promote evidence-based and mother-/baby-friendly care. What qualities allow childbirth educators, doulas, nurses, and perinatal care providers to keep going even when the health-care practices around them often do not match their values? This editorial explores the impact of recent trends in which increasing utilization of elective technology in maternity care may affect the individual commitment of childbirth advocates. Borrowing from research on successful advocates in other fields, the author speculates on both why and how childbirth advocates sustain commitment and how "we will prevail."
    Journal of Perinatal Education 02/2008; 17(1):7-10. DOI:10.1624/105812408X267907
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Forderungen nach vermehrter 'Sozialer Kompetenz' werden in Organisationen immer populärer. Statt einen weiteren Beitrag dazu zu liefern, welche nun die erfolgversprechendsten Kompetenzen seien, werden in dieser sozialkonstruktionistischen Arbeit die Funktionen des Konzepts in Relation zum metaphorischen Verständnis der Organisation analysiert. Das Ziel von "Sozialer Kompetenz", nämlich ein möglichst reibungsloses und für Organisationen dienliches Miteinander, wird kritisch diskutiert. Im Rahmen der linguistischen Analyse der Diskurse Sozialen Miteinanders in Organisationen wird erläutert, welche Verständnisse eines jeweiligen Miteinanders welche Effekte und Funktionen für die Organisationen haben. Die detaillierte Analyse erlaubt es, hinter die alltäglich gebräuchlichen Konzepte zu schauen und durch dieses Hinterfragen eine nachhaltigere Praxis des Sozialen Miteinanders in Organisationen zu ermöglichen.
Show more