Confocal reflectance theta line scanning microscope for imaging human skin in vivo

Institute of Optics, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, United States
Optics Letters (Impact Factor: 3.18). 05/2006; 31(7):942-4. DOI: 10.1364/OL.31.000942
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT A confocal reflectance theta line scanning microscope demonstrates imaging of nuclear and cellular detail in human epidermis in vivo. Experimentally measured line-spread functions determine the instrumental optical section thickness to be 1.7 +/- 0.1 microm and the lateral resolution to be 1.0 +/- 0.1 microm. Within human dermis (through full-thickness epidermis), the measured section thickness is 9.2 +/- 1.7 microm and the lateral resolution is 1.7 +/- 0.1 microm. An illumination line is scanned directly in the pupil of the objective lens, and the backscattered descanned light is detected with a linear array, such that the theta line scanner consists of only seven optical components.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Based on diffraction theory, this paper theoretically demonstrates improvements in axial resolution in confocal microscopy with fan-shaped apertures. It provides the optimal geometric parameters of the fan-shaped pupils to give the maximum axial resolution for a given pinhole size. To fully understand the overall performance, the signal-to-background ratio and the signal level with regard to the geometric parameters are discussed.
    Applied Optics 02/2015; 54(6). DOI:10.1364/AO.54.001354 · 1.69 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Bessel beams have recently been investigated as a means of improving deep-tissue microscopy in highly scattering and heterogeneous media. It has been suggested that the long depth-of-field and self-reconstructing property of a Bessel beam enables an increased penetration depth of the focused beam in tissues compared to a conventional Gaussian beam. However, a study is needed to better quantify the magnitude of the beam steering as well as the distortion of focused Gaussian and Bessel beams in tissues with microscopic heterogeneities. Here, we have developed an imaging method and quantitative metrics to evaluate the motion and distortion of low-numerical-aperture (NA) Gaussian and Bessel beams focused in water, heterogeneous phantoms, and fresh mouse esophagus tissues. Our results indicate that low-NA Bessel beams exhibit reduced beam-steering artifacts and distortions compared to Gaussian beams, and are therefore potentially useful for microscopy applications in which pointing accuracy and beam quality are critical, such as dual-axis confocal (DAC) microscopy.
    Biomedical Optics Express 04/2015; 6(4). DOI:10.1364/BOE.6.001318 · 3.50 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: One enduring challenge of biological imaging is achieving depth of penetration-into cells, tissues, and animals. How deeply can we probe and with what resolution and efficacy? These are critical issues as microscopists seek to push ever deeper, while resolving structural details and observing specific molecular events. In this guide to depth-appropriate modalities, standard optical platforms such as confocal and two-photon microscopes are considered along with complementary imaging modalities that range in depth of penetration. After an introduction to basic techniques, the trade-offs and limitations that distinguish competing technologies are considered, with emphasis on the visualization of subcellular structures and dynamic events. Not surprisingly, there are differences of opinion regarding imaging technologies, as highlighted in a section on point-scanning and Nipkow-disk style confocal microscopes. Confocal microscopy is then contrasted with deconvolution and multi-photon imaging modalities. It is also important to consider the detectors used by current instruments (such as PMTs and CCD cameras). Ultimately specimen properties, in conjunction with instrumentation, determine the depth at which subcellular operations and larger-scale biological processes can be visualized. Relative advantages are mentioned in the context of experiment planning and instrument-purchase decisions. Given the rate at which new optical techniques are being invented, this report should be viewed as a snapshot of current capabilities, with the goal of providing a framework for thinking about new developments.
    Methods in cell biology 02/2008; 89:95-128. DOI:10.1016/S0091-679X(08)00605-5 · 1.44 Impact Factor