Children’s coping strategies and coping efficacy: Relations to parent socialization, child adjustment, and familial alcoholism

Arizona State University, USA.
Development and Psychopathology (Impact Factor: 4.89). 02/2006; 18(2):445-69. DOI: 10.1017/S095457940606024X
Source: PubMed


The relations of children's coping strategies and coping efficacy to parent socialization and child adjustment were examined in a sample of school-age children that included families in which some of the grandparents and/or parents had an alcoholism diagnosis. Parents and older children reported on the children's coping strategies; parents reported on their parenting behavior; and teachers reported on children's externalizing and internalizing problems. Measures of parent socialization were associated with parents' and children's reports of active coping strategies and parents' reports of both support-seeking coping and coping efficacy. Some of these relations were moderated by familial alcohol status. Children higher in parent-reported active/support-seeking coping and coping efficacy were rated lower in teacher-reported externalizing and internalizing adjustment problems. The findings were consistent with the view that active/support-seeking coping and coping efficacy mediated the association of parent socialization to children's psychological adjustment and that this relation was sometimes moderated by parental alcohol status.

Download full-text


Available from: Laurie Chassin,
  • Source
    • "Contrary to hypotheses, the relations between effective discipline and children's coping efforts and coping efficacy were non-significant. The null findings are inconsistent with previous research on the relations between parental discipline and children's coping (e.g., Power, 2004; Smith et al., 2006). The discrepancy may be due to "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study examines whether intervention-induced changes in mother-child relationship quality and discipline led to short-term (6 months) and long-term (6 years) changes in children's coping processes in a sample of 240 youth aged 9-12 years when assessed initially. Data were from a randomized, experimental trial of a parenting-focused preventive intervention designed to improve children's postdivorce adjustment. Three-wave prospective mediational analyses revealed that intervention-induced improvements in relationship quality led to increases in coping efficacy at 6 months and to increases in coping efficacy and active coping at 6 years. Tests of the mediated effects were significant for all 3 indirect paths. Results are discussed in terms of pathways to adaptive coping and implications for the implementation of preventive interventions targeting coping.
    Child Development 01/2011; 82(1):244-57. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01553.x · 4.92 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "relationship with their parents use more active and less avoidant coping strategies (Herman and McHale 1993; Kliewer et al. 1996; Smith et al. 2006). These positive parenting behaviors may provide a context that supports effective coping strategies, facilitates access to and encourages the use of helpful resources, or fosters a sense of competence to deal with stressors (Sandler et al. 1997). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We examined the effects of maternal parenting behavior on coping strategies in 200 low-income, African American children (mean age=10.41) and the role of child gender and economic stress on these effects. Participants completed measures of perceived economic stressors, coping strategies and perceptions of mothers’ parenting behaviors. Regression analyses demonstrated a main effect for maternal support on active coping and support-seeking coping. For boys, hierarchical regression analyses revealed that maternal support and economic stressors interacted to predict active and support-seeking coping. For girls, there was a significant interaction between maternal psychological control and economic stressors in the prediction of avoidant coping. Our results add to the literature on the effects of parent–child relationships on children’s responses to stress. KeywordsCoping strategies-Maternal support-Maternal control-African American children-Economic stress
    Journal of Child and Family Studies 10/2010; 19(5):579-587. DOI:10.1007/s10826-009-9333-3 · 1.42 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "In contrast, authoritative parenting was expected to predict high CE because (a) it promotes emotion regulation and effective coping (Saarni, Campos, Camras, & Witherington, 2006) and (b) it may promote learning and enacting of effective coping by providing stability and predictability to the family environment (Kliewer, Sandler, & Wolchik, 1994). In support of these views, Smith et al. (2006) found concurrent positive relations between parental consistency of discipline and support and children's CE in Hispanic and Euro-American children. However , few researchers have examined the prospective relations between parenting and children's CE. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The relations of parenting and temperament (effortful control and anger/frustration) to children's externalizing problems were examined in a 3.8-year longitudinal study of 425 native Chinese children (6-9 years) from Beijing. Children's experience of negative life events and coping efficacy were examined as mediators in the parenting- and temperament-externalizing relations. Parents reported on their own parenting. Parents and teachers rated temperament. Children reported on negative life events and coping efficacy. Parents, teachers, children, or peers rated children's externalizing problems. Authoritative and authoritarian parenting and anger/frustration uniquely predicted externalizing problems. The relation between authoritarian parenting and externalizing was mediated by children's coping efficacy and negative school events. The results suggest there is some cross-cultural universality in the developmental pathways for externalizing problems.
    Child Development 05/2008; 79(3):493-513. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01139.x · 4.92 Impact Factor
Show more