Article

Survival after resection for primary lung cancer: A population based study of 3211 resected patients

Cancer Registry of Norway, Kristiania (historical), Oslo, Norway
Thorax (Impact Factor: 8.56). 09/2006; 61(8):710-5. DOI: 10.1136/thx.2005.056481
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Very few population based results have been presented for survival after resection for lung cancer. The purpose of this study was to present long term survival after resection and to quantify prognostic factors for survival.
All lung cancer patients diagnosed in Norway in 1993-2002 were reported to the Cancer Registry of Norway (n = 19 582). A total of 3211 patients underwent surgical resection and were included for analysis. Supplementary information from hospitals (including co-morbidity data) was collected for patients diagnosed in 1993-8. Five year observed and relative survival was analysed for patients diagnosed and operated in 1993-9. Factors believed to influence survival were analysed by a Cox proportional hazard regression model.
Five year relative survival in the period 1993-9 was 46.4% (n = 2144): 58.4% for stage I disease (n = 1375), 28.4% for stage II (n = 532), 15.1% for IIIa (n = 133), 24.1% for IIIb (n = 63), and 21.1% for stage IV disease (n = 41). The high survival in stage IIIb and IV was due to the contribution of multiple tumours. Cox regression analysis identified male sex, higher age, procedures other than upper and middle lobectomy, histologies such as adenocarcinoma and large cell carcinoma, surgery on the right side, infiltration of resection margins, and larger tumour size as non-favourable prognostic factors.
Survival was favourable for resected patients in a population based group including subgroups such as elderly patients, those with advanced stage, small cell lung cancer, tumours with nodal invasion, and patients with multiple tumours. These results question the validity of the current TNM system for lung cancer with regard to tumour size and categorization of multiple tumours.

0 Followers
 · 
93 Views
    • "Even in the series gathered by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC), most patients had undergone resection [10]. Formerly published data from the Cancer Registry of Norway on survival after resection for primary lung cancer, including carcinoid tumors, demonstrate the 5-year observed and relative survival for carcinoid tumors to be 94% and 99%, respectively [11]. However, a subdivision into TC and AC was not performed at the time, nor were the cases reviewed by pathologists. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Few published reports have examined the incidence and outcomes for patients with carcinoid lung tumors. The aim of the current study was to explore incidence, type of surgical treatment given, and outcome for patients with typical (TC) and atypical (AC) lung carcinoids in a national cohort (Norway). All lung-cancer patients diagnosed in the period 1993-2005 and who were reported to the Cancer Registry of Norway were identified. Biopsies or resection specimens were reviewed and reclassified according to the World Health Organization (WHO) 2004 classification. Surgically treated patients were staged according to the seventh edition of the pathological tumor-node-metastasis (pTNM) staging system. Of 26665 lung cancers registered during the period, 265 (1%) had carcinoid tumors, of which 11 were diagnosed coincidentally at autopsy. In the remaining 254 patients, TCs were found in 188 cases, and ACs were found in 59 cases; seven cases had unclassifiable carcinoids. Of the 217 resected tumors, 173 (80%) were TCs. General surgeons performed 94 resections, including 11 of 17 pneumonectomies. All six bronchial resections were performed by thoracic surgeons. Of the 33 operated patients who died during follow-up, 18 had metastatic carcinoid tumors, of which 10 (56%) were ACs. In 37 non-resected patients (15 with AC and seven with unclassifiable histology), metastatic or locally advanced disease (N=21, 12 of which were ACs) was the main cause of inoperability and death. Five-year survival for all patients was 92% for TC and 66% for AC; for resected patients, the survival rates were 96% and 79%, respectively. Carcinoids are rare malignant tumors and are, in most cases, resectable; the TC subgroup had better prognosis than the AC in univariate analyses. The main cause of death was metastasis/locally advanced tumor at presentation or recurrent disease following resection; both situations were three times more common in patients with AC.
    European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery: official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery 09/2010; 39(4):565-9. DOI:10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.08.036 · 2.81 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To study surgical mortality and evaluate major risk factors, with specific focus on the role of pathological stage in patients undergoing lung cancer resection. Age, gender, comorbidity, resection volume, experience of the hospital and surgical team have been reported as variables related to postoperative morbidity and mortality in lung cancer. The role of pathological tumor stage on postoperative mortality has never been fully evaluated. The study included 1418 consecutive lung cancer resections performed from 1998 to 2002 in two institutions. The effect of age, gender, comorbidity, resection volume, pathological stage and induction therapies on postoperative mortality was assessed by univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis. Postoperative mortality was 1.8% overall, 3.7% (9/243) for pneumonectomy, 1.7% (17/1016) for lobectomy, and null (0/159) for sublobar resections (P = 0.020). At multivariable analysis, cardiovascular comorbidity (P = 0.008), resection volume (P = 0.036) and pathological stage (P = 0.027) emerged as significant predictors of surgical mortality. Early stage lung cancer resection has a favorable effect on surgical mortality, not only by preventing the need for pneumonectomy, but also by reducing mortality after lobectomy.
    Tumori 94(3):362-9. · 1.09 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Subspace-based array signal processing methods (e.g. MUSIC, ESPRIT, GEESE, etc.) implicitly require an accurate partitioning of the sampled data into signal and orthogonal (“noise”) subspaces-in essence, an accurate estimate of the number of independent signals arriving at the array. Information-theoretic enumeration approaches have been proposed to avoid ad hoc criteria. Unfortunately, the models and assumptions used for information-theoretic approaches are often not valid for underwater environments due to wavefront spreading, array element coupling, flow noise, distributed sources, etc. To relax the enumeration criteria, we exploit the stability of the signal subspace for persistent signal sources coupled with the a priori knowledge of the array manifold. In-water sonar data is used to demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach in situations where conventional information-theoretic criteria fail. Although a variety of formulations are possible which exploit the model validity assessment and subspace stability, the proposed SSET (Subspace Stability Exploitation Tracker) approach presented is attractive due to the relatively low computational demands. Essentially, the approach involves applying multiple hypothesis target tracking algorithms to the movement of potential signal roots in the complex plane derived from matrix-shifting implementations of subspace DOA estimation algorithms. Due to the relatively low computational demands and indifference to the noise covariance structure, SSET is appropriate for real-time in-water implementation
    Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Technology, 1996. AUV '96., Proceedings of the 1996 Symposium on; 07/1996
Show more

Preview

Download
1 Download
Available from