Article

Medical Students' Perceptions of Psychiatry as a Career Choice

Columbia University, New York, New York, United States
Academic Psychiatry (Impact Factor: 0.81). 04/2006; 30(2):144-9. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ap.30.2.144
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This study describes medical students' perceptions of the field of psychiatry and identifies the impact of those perceptions on their career choices in order to explore the questions: Are we as a field doing all that we can to enhance the educational experience of all medical students, regardless of their career preferences? What are the most appropriate ways to encourage interested medical students that would allow for more targeted recruitment efforts toward the most receptive students?
Third-year (n=131) and fourth-year medical students (n=117) at a northeastern, urban, private university medical school completed anonymous self-report questionnaires. Students rated the impact of intellectual interest, status, earning potential, healthcare reform, quality of life, satisfaction, and stress of working with psychiatric patients on their consideration of a psychiatric career. Respondents were then systematically divided into two groups: 1) those who considered psychiatry as a possible career choice and 2) those who did not.
When compared to students who had been coded as "not seriously considering" a career in psychiatry, students coded as "seriously considering" gave significantly higher positive ratings to the field's intellectual content and quality of life. There were also significant differences between the groups regarding the satisfaction involved in working with psychiatric patients. Students from both groups were equally concerned about stress levels in the field.
Acknowledging, discussing, and providing a context for stressful experiences during the psychiatry clerkship are likely to bring about productive approaches to improve recruitment into the field as well as to improve all students' psychiatric education.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Mark J Graham, Mar 02, 2015
1 Follower
 · 
82 Views
  • Source
    • "Other commonly cited reasons included coming to the view that psychiatry was 'scientific', 'fascinating' and 'holistic'. In common with previous research, a view of psychiatry being associated with high quality of life also appeared to be a significant factor (Goldacre, Turner et al. 2005; Cutler, Alspector et al. 2006; Wigney and Parker 2008; Robertson, Walter et al. 2009). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this paper was to examine the influence of a clinical attachment in psychiatry on medical students' attitudes to psychiatry as a specialty and potential career. Medical students at Sydney Medical School were surveyed following an 8-week clinical attachment in psychiatry. Secondary analyses sought to identify associations with variables such as age, gender and level of clinical experience as a medical student. Following a clinical attachment in psychiatry, 80% of students rated their attitude to psychiatry as more positive. Approximately 32% rated themselves as likely or very likely to choose a career in psychiatry. No differences were seen with respect to gender, age or stage of training. The quality of the teaching, enthusiasm of the clinical teachers, the holistic approach and scientific basis of psychiatry were cited by students as factors influencing attitudes. The clinical rotation in psychiatry is a significant factor influencing medical student attitudes towards psychiatry.
    Australasian Psychiatry 08/2010; 18(4):348-53. DOI:10.3109/10398561003739612 · 0.56 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "This impact occurred despite students finding (1) their preclinical exposure to psychiatry appealing, (2) the in-depth relationships that they developed with psychiatric patients engaging, and (3) the opportunity to observe psychiatric patients' status improve impressive. Our results do not indicate that students observed psychiatric faculty and residents with whom they worked as ''stressed'' (Cutler et al. 2006 "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: People with mental illness around the world continue to suffer from stigmatization and limited care. Previous studies utilizing self-report questionnaires indicate that many medical students regard clinical work with psychiatric patients as unappealing, while the professionalism literature has documented a general decline in students' capacity for empathy over the course of medical school. Through in-depth interviews, this study attempts to better understand the formation of medical students' perceptions of psychiatry and the implications of that process for a more general understanding of the impact of emotionally-laden experiences on medical students' capacity for empathy. Forty-seven fourth-year medical students who had expressed interest or performed well in psychiatry were asked a series of questions to elicit their perceptions of the field of psychiatry. Interview transcripts were systematically coded using content analysis and principles of grounded theory. Stigma, stereotypes, and stressfully intense emotional reactions seemed to adversely affect the students' expected satisfaction from and willingness to care for the mentally ill, despite enjoying psychiatry's intellectual content and the opportunity to develop in-depth relationships with patients. Teaching faculty need to directly address the stigma and stereotypes that surround mental illness and actively help medical students cope with the stress that they report experiencing during their psychiatry clerkship in order to improve the recognition and treatment of psychiatric illness by newly graduating physicians. More generally, the relationships that we identify among stress, stigmatization, and stereotyping along an empathic spectrum suggest that increased attention should be paid to the stress that empathy can entail. This perspective may allow for the creation of similarly targeted interventions throughout the medical school curriculum to counteract the decline in empathy, the so-called "hardening of the heart," associated with physician-training worldwide.
    Advances in Health Sciences Education 10/2008; 14(4):487-502. DOI:10.1007/s10459-008-9132-4 · 2.71 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: he clinical quality of U.S. physicians, the unevenness in their attention to the care of psychiatric patients, and their awareness of the importance of the ability to handle the psychological aspects of nonpsychiatricmedical care are of great consequence. Therefore, education re- garding the behavioral and psychiatric aspects of medical care as well as education of physicians who specialize in the treatment of psychiatric patients deserves careful study. The authors of the papers in this special issue of Aca- demic Psychiatry refer back to the 1960s, when psychiatric education was widely considered an afterthought. During that period, the amount of research on psychiatric disor- ders and the cumulative size of U.S. research effort were modest. Few schools had substantial research programs as part of their psychiatric departments. Further, psychiatry was considered a less desirable specialty, and departments of psychiatry were considered secondary to departmentsof other specialties. Psychiatry was frequently characterized as a specialty with people who were, to say the least, "id- iosyncratic." Such generalizations about the field were made not only in curbside conversation but overtly. Today, the overall research effort on psychiatric disor- ders has increased substantially. Many would describe the questions being addressed in psychiatry and brain science and behavior as constituting one of the most critical areas in medical research. Moreover, psychiatry is frequently ranked first, second, or third among departments in the amount of research conducted in a given medical school. Additionally, psychiatric leaders have increasingly been appointed to positions of consequence in academia. Whereas in the early 1960s, there was hardly a dean in the U.S. who was a psychiatrist; in recent years, psychiatry has been the discipline of as many as 10% to 12% of U.S. medical school deans. Further, psychiatrists haveoccupied positions such as hospital president; university president; academic medical center chancellor; academic medical center vice president; associate dean;InstituteofMedicine president; and, most recently, Association of American Medical Colleges president. This is not to say that denigration of psychiatry by aca- demia has disappeared. However, this denigration takes its place along with that aimed at othermedicaldisciplines, since all disciplines seem to have their occasional critics and naysayers. As a field that contends with some of so- ciety's most sensitive problems(e.g.,HIV,competency,sui- cide), psychiatry, naturally, is subject to considerable de- bate and sharp scrutiny. Recently, however,criticismofthe field by some has been accompanied by increasing respect from others. Realization of the large share of the global burden of illness that has been identified by the World Health Or- ganization along with recognition of psychiatric medical problems in the treatment of nonpsychiatric medical ill- nesses, such as heart disease, diabetes, and asthma, has increased attention toward the field. Moreover, theaward- ing of the Nobel, Lasker, and other distinguished recog- nition to investigators in psychiatry increases the general acknowledgement of the field as a legitimate medical dis- cipline. In the process of becoming a more full-fledged member of the medicine family, however, psychiatry encounters more problems of academic medicine. Increased assump- tion of responsibilities in medicine overall is evident in the selection of more psychiatrists to leadership positions in broader arenas that contend with problems in medicine. Such problems include the sometimes inadequateatten- tion to teaching throughout medical education, the need for more rewards for those who teach, the problem offind- ing enough faculty, the paucityofattentiontoperformance feedback regarding student interviews of patients, and the need for more rigorous evaluation of students. With increased societal regard for psychiatry, the rec- ognition and need for interdisciplinary collaborations in research, teaching of human behavior, and medical care of
    Academic Psychiatry 04/2006; 30(2):98-100. DOI:10.1176/appi.ap.30.2.98 · 0.81 Impact Factor
Show more