Effects of early enteral feeding on the outcome of critically ill mechanically ventilated medical patients

Henry Ford Hospital, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, 2799 W Grand Blvd, K-17, Detroit, MI 48202, USA.
Chest (Impact Factor: 7.13). 04/2006; 129(4):960-7. DOI: 10.1378/chest.129.4.960
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To determine the impact of early enteral feeding on the outcome of critically ill medical patients.
Retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected large multi-institutional ICU database.
A total of 4,049 patients requiring mechanical ventilation for > 2 days.
Patients were classified according to whether or not they received enteral feeding within 48 h of mechanical ventilation onset. The 2,537 patients (63%) who did receive enteral feeding were labeled as the "early feeding group," and the remaining 1,512 patients (37%) were labeled as the "late feeding group." The overall ICU and hospital mortality were lower in the early feeding group (18.1% vs 21.4%, p = 0.01; and 28.7% vs 33.5%, p = 0.001, respectively). The lower mortality rates in the early feeding group were most evident in the sickest group as defined by quartiles of severity of illness scores. Three separate models were done using each of the different scores (acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II, simplified acute physiology score II, and mortality prediction model at time 0). In all models, early enteral feeding was associated with an approximately 20% decrease in ICU mortality and a 25% decrease in hospital mortality. We also analyzed the data after controlling for confounding by matching for propensity score. In this analysis, early feeding was again associated with decreased ICU and hospital mortality. In all adjusted analysis, early feeding was found to be independently associated with an increased risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) developing.
Early feeding significantly reduces ICU and hospital mortality based mainly on improvements in the sickest patients, despite being associated with an increased risk of VAP developing. Routine administration of such therapy in medical patients receiving mechanical ventilation is suggested, especially in patients at high risk of death.

1 Follower
  • Source
    Annales francaises d'anesthesie et de reanimation 02/2014; 28(2). DOI:10.1016/j.annfar.2014.01.008 · 0.84 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE: To review current methods for confirming nasogastric tube position and their efficacy in relation to the need to feed. DESIGN AND METHODS: This paper reviews current guidelines and techniques to safely confirm tube position balanced against the need to provide nutrition quickly. All new information was incorporated from electronic database searches up to 7.4.2012. FINDINGS: Tube misplacement per se, feeding through undetected misplaced tubes and the potentially fatal complications that arise from both appear to be underestimated. Misplacement occurs due to failure to confirm tube position, lack of expertise in interpretation or inability of the confirmation method to differentiate safe placement from misplacement. Inability to confirm tube position is a major cause of delay to feeding and risks malnutrition. DISCUSSION: Theoretically, X-ray is the gold standard for confirming tube position. However, because X-ray is associated with misinterpretation and delays feeding, it should in most cases be the second-line confirmation technique after other methods fail. Currently, pH offers the most practical first-line confirmation method with a threshold of ≤5.0 indicating gastric position. A pH threshold ≤4.0 increases false negatives, excess X-ray use and misinterpretation and delay to feeding whereas a threshold >5.0 can fail to detect lung, oesophageal or intestinal placement. Traumatic injury on misplacement can be pre-empted by use of capnography/capnometry or X-ray at a 35cm tube depth or an electromagnetic (EM) trace. The EM trace guides real-time placement and re-positioning until gastric position is attained but a larger evidence-base is required to confirm this potential. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Research is urgently required on how to avoid tube misplacement. This must be balanced against risk of delayed feeding and cumulative nutritional deficit leading to subsequent complications and mortality.
    Intensive & critical care nursing: the official journal of the British Association of Critical Care Nurses 10/2012; DOI:10.1016/j.iccn.2012.07.002
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Bacterial translocation as a direct cause of sepsis is an attractive hypothesis that presupposes that in specific situations bacteria cross the intestinal barrier, enter the systemic circulation, and cause a systemic inflammatory response syndrome. Critically ill children are at increased risk for bacterial translocation, particularly in the early postnatal age. Predisposing factors include intestinal obstruction, obstructive jaundice, intra-abdominal hypertension, intestinal ischemia/reperfusion injury and secondary ileus, and immaturity of the intestinal barrier per se. Despite good evidence from experimental studies to support the theory of bacterial translocation as a cause of sepsis, there is little evidence in human studies to confirm that translocation is directly correlated to bloodstream infections in critically ill children. This paper provides an overview of the gut microflora and its significance, a focus on the mechanisms employed by bacteria to gain access to the systemic circulation, and how critical illness creates a hostile environment in the gut and alters the microflora favoring the growth of pathogens that promote bacterial translocation. It also covers treatment with pre- and pro biotics during critical illness to restore the balance of microbial communities in a beneficial way with positive effects on intestinal permeability and bacterial translocation.
    International Journal of Microbiology 08/2012; 2012:151393. DOI:10.1155/2012/151393