Article

Effects of early enteral feeding on the outcome of critically ill mechanically ventilated medical patients.

Henry Ford Hospital, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, 2799 W Grand Blvd, K-17, Detroit, MI 48202, USA.
Chest (Impact Factor: 7.13). 04/2006; 129(4):960-7. DOI: 10.1378/chest.129.4.960
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To determine the impact of early enteral feeding on the outcome of critically ill medical patients.
Retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected large multi-institutional ICU database.
A total of 4,049 patients requiring mechanical ventilation for > 2 days.
Patients were classified according to whether or not they received enteral feeding within 48 h of mechanical ventilation onset. The 2,537 patients (63%) who did receive enteral feeding were labeled as the "early feeding group," and the remaining 1,512 patients (37%) were labeled as the "late feeding group." The overall ICU and hospital mortality were lower in the early feeding group (18.1% vs 21.4%, p = 0.01; and 28.7% vs 33.5%, p = 0.001, respectively). The lower mortality rates in the early feeding group were most evident in the sickest group as defined by quartiles of severity of illness scores. Three separate models were done using each of the different scores (acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II, simplified acute physiology score II, and mortality prediction model at time 0). In all models, early enteral feeding was associated with an approximately 20% decrease in ICU mortality and a 25% decrease in hospital mortality. We also analyzed the data after controlling for confounding by matching for propensity score. In this analysis, early feeding was again associated with decreased ICU and hospital mortality. In all adjusted analysis, early feeding was found to be independently associated with an increased risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) developing.
Early feeding significantly reduces ICU and hospital mortality based mainly on improvements in the sickest patients, despite being associated with an increased risk of VAP developing. Routine administration of such therapy in medical patients receiving mechanical ventilation is suggested, especially in patients at high risk of death.

1 Bookmark
 · 
324 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: La nutrition artificielle est une pierre angulaire de la prise en charge du patient traité par ventilation mécanique invasive. Les recommandations internationales préconisent d’instaurer la nutrition le plus précocement possible après l’admission et, en l’absence de contre-indication digestive formelle, de privilégier la voie entérale. Cependant, de nombreux facteurs concourent à entraver sa bonne administration. Parmi ceux-ci, l’intolérance digestive à la nutrition et la prévention de ses conséquences potentielles apparaissent régulièrement comme des obstacles fréquents. Cependant, la définition même et l’approche de l’intolérance digestive à la nutrition entérale doivent être reconsidérées. Les régurgitations et les vomissements ne semblent pas constituer un facteur source de complications significatives, notamment de pneumopathie acquise sous ventilation mécanique. Leur prévention et leur gestion ne doivent pas entraver à l’excès l’atteinte des objectifs nutritionnels. La surveillance du volume gastrique résiduel ne doit plus être réalisée en routine. En cas d’intolérance, l’administration d’un prokinétique gastrique doit précéder la diminution de la nutrition entérale qui ne doit être interrompue qu’en dernier recours, sauf signes de gravité ou orientant vers une cause organique qui nécessitera un traitement approprié et éventuellement de préférer la voie parentérale. L’utilisation d’un protocole prédéterminé, synthétisant les connaissances dans le domaine, adapté aux caractéristiques des patients accueillis dans l’unité et connu de tous les membres de l’équipe est un facteur favorisant l’atteinte des objectifs nutritionnels. Des travaux de recherche clinique en cours ou à venir devraient permettre de mieux étayer les futures recommandations dans le domaine de la nutrition artificielle du patient ventilé. Abstract Nutritional support is a cornerstone of the care of critically ill patients treated with invasive mechanical ventilation. Guidelines recommend to start nutrition as soon as possible after admission in the intensive care unit and to use the enteral route. However, many critically ill patients experience poor tolerance to early enteral nutrition (EN), which has been ascribed to gastroparesis with increased gastric volume, gastroesophageal reflux, regurgitation or vomiting and subsequent increased risk of aspiration and ventilator-associated pneumonia. Management of intolerance to EN has been reported as a leading cause of hypocaloric feeding. However, both definition and management of gastrointestinal intolerance to enteral feeding should be revisited. Regurgitation and vomiting do not seem to be a leading cause of significant complications including ventilator-associated pneumonia. Thus, prevention of vomiting should not significantly impede the delivery of EN. Monitoring of gastric residual volume should not be routinely performed. In case of vomiting, prokinetic drugs should be administered in first-line before any reduction in the rate of EN delivery. Prophylactic treatment with prokinetic drugs should be promoted in patients at high risk of vomiting. Predetermined protocol on EN delivery should be implemented in all intensive care units with the aim to achieve nutritional goals in most of the patients treated with mechanical ventilation. Because of numerous uncertainties, further studies are required in the field of artificial nutrition in the critically ill patients.
    Réanimation 01/2013; 23(S2):450-457.
  • Critical Care Medicine 01/2007; 35(4):1220. · 6.15 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Thrita. 08/2014; 3(3).

Preview

Download
8 Downloads