Article

Public perceptions of drinking water: a postal survey of residents with private water supplies

Division of Community Health, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland, A1B 3V6, Canada.
BMC Public Health (Impact Factor: 2.32). 02/2006; 6:94. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-6-94
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT In Canada, the legal responsibility for the condition of private water supplies, including private wells and cisterns, rests with their owners. However, there are reports that Canadians test these water supplies intermittently and that treatment of such water is uncommon. An estimated 45% of all waterborne outbreaks in Canada involve non-municipal systems. An understanding of the perceptions and needs of Canadians served by private water supplies is essential, as it would enable public health professionals to better target public education and drinking water policy. The purpose of this study was to investigate the public perceptions of private water supplies in the City of Hamilton, Ontario (Canada), with the intent of informing public education and outreach strategies within the population.
A cross-sectional postal survey of 246 residences with private water supplies was conducted in May 2004. Questions pertained to the perceptions of water quality and alternative water sources, water testing behaviours and the self-identified need for further information.
Private wells, cisterns or both, were the source of household water for 71%, 16% and 13% of respondents, respectively. Although respondents rated their water quality highly, 80% also had concerns with its safety. The most common concerns pertained to bacterial and chemical contamination of their water supply and its potential negative effect on health. Approximately 56% and 61% of respondents used in-home treatment devices and bottled water within their homes, respectively, mainly due to perceived improvements in the safety and aesthetic qualities compared to regular tap water. Testing of private water supplies was performed infrequently: 8% of respondents tested at a frequency that meets current provincial guidelines. Two-thirds of respondents wanted more information on various topics related to private water supplies. Flyers and newspapers were the two media reported most likely to be used.
Although respondents rated their water quality highly, the majority had concerns regarding the water from their private supply, and the use of bottled water and water treatment devices was extensive. The results of this study suggest important lines of inquiry and provide support and input for public education programs, particularly those related to private water testing, in this population.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Shannon Majowicz, May 05, 2014
1 Follower
 · 
143 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The first objective of this study was to investigate the public perceptions of private water and alternative sources with respect to safety, quality, testing and treatment in Newfoundland and Labrador (NL), Canada. The second objective was to provide public health practitioners with recommendations for improving knowledge translation (KT) efforts in NL, based on assessments of respondents' perceived information needs and preferred KT methods. A cross-sectional telephone survey of 618 households with private water supplies was conducted in March-April, 2007. Questions pertained to respondents' perceptions of their tap water, water concerns, alternative water use, well characteristics, and water testing behaviours. Approximately 94% of households were supplied by private wells (50% drilled and 50% dug wells), while 6% obtained water from roadside ponds, rivers or springs (RPRS). While 85% rated their water quality highly, 55% nevertheless had concerns about its overall safety. Approximately 11% of respondents never tested their water, and of the 89% that had, 80% tested at frequencies below provincial recommendations for bacterial testing. More than one-third of respondents reported treating their water in the home, and 78% employed active carbon filtration methods. Respondents wanted more information on testing options and advice on effective treatment methods. Targeted advertising through television, flyers/brochures and/or radio is recommended as a first step to increase awareness. More active KT methods involving key stakeholders may be most effective in improving testing and treatment behaviour. The results presented here can assist public health practitioners in tailoring current KT initiatives to influence well owner stewardship behaviour.
    BMC Public Health 12/2013; 13(1):1225. DOI:10.1186/1471-2458-13-1225 · 2.32 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Food and water borne diseases are resulted from consuming unsafe drinking water. However, a few states in Malaysia including Kelantan were reported to have low accessibility to treated water. The aim of this study was to assess the preference for safe drinking water and its associated factors among Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia (HUSM) outpatient clinic attendees. A cross-sectional study was conducted from 1 st February 2011 to 30 th April 2011. A convenient sampling was applied and face to face interview was conducted by using a structured questionnaire. Those 18 years and above and literate were included as subjects. Results show that the proportion towards safe drinking water preferences was 30.4% (95% CI: 0.22, 0.39). Two significant associated factors for safe drinking water preferences were current used of drinking water source and household income status. People who currently used municipal water has 14.32 times odds to prefer safe drinking water than person who used other sources (95% CI: 4.08, 50.30, p <0.001). Those at low and middle income level were 0.23 (95% CI: 0.06, 0.84, p=0.027) and 0.11 (95% CI: 0.03, 0.47, p=0.003) times odds to prefer safe drinking water than those below poverty line consecutively. In conclusion, the proportion of safe drinking water preference among HUSM outpatient clinic attendees was low and associated with current drinking water source and income level. An effective public awareness campaign is needed to convince public toward municipal water supply in order to help reducing the incidence of food and water borne diseases.
    Health & the Environment Journal 01/2013; 4(1):31-41.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose: Implementing the recent American Academy of Pediatrics' (AAP) policy for annual well water testing will impact pediatric healthcare providers, who will be called upon for advice regarding testing, interpretation, and mitigation. We report findings from a study of low-income rural families' participation in household well water testing.Data sources: We collected data from 188 rural low-income households inclusive of 320 children under the age of seven. Participating families lived in one of two western U.S. counties and received water from a well with < 15 connections. Household water samples and questionnaire data were collected for analysis.Conclusions: Twenty-seven percent of households tested positive for at least one contaminant, including total coliforms (18%), arsenic (6%), synthetic organic chemicals (6%), nitrates (2%), fluoride (2%), and E. coli (<1%). Eighty-nine percent of households testing positive for total coliforms were positive at re-test. Respondents expressed greatest concern for biological contamination and took multiple precautionary actions, although only 31% had ever tested their water for contaminants. Higher levels of education, income, and age, as well as homeowner status, were significantly associated with previous testing.Implications for practice: Recommendations for communicating abnormal results, mitigating risks, and overcoming logistical challenges are presented.
    Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners 04/2011; 23(5):258 - 265. DOI:10.1111/j.1745-7599.2011.00609.x · 0.87 Impact Factor